for this info!
Of course, I think the downside of getting another dependency to myfaces
would highly be outvalued by the benefit we'd gain from it :)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 2/27/11, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
Subject
Hi,
I'll be at Devoxx (I'm an Apache MyFaces guy btw). Will probably do a talk
too, if time permits.
And I've also already talked to some other JSF/CDI related people, like Dan
Allen and Lincoln Baxter III. Both from JBoss. They will be there as well.
Getting a beer in downtown Antwerp sounds
+1, plan sounds lovely. ;-)
/JK
2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Hi,
since over a year the trunk is labeled as 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I
wonder when the trunk will
feel the same love for good version numbers?
Oops, pressed send too fast.
@Matzew: We do the same thing at MyFaces. Maybe suggest the same thing
there?
/JK
2010/3/14 Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
+1, plan sounds lovely. ;-)
/JK
2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Hi,
since over a year the trunk
improves
adoption.
Regards,
Jan-Kees
2010/3/9 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Mar 7, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel wrote:
Maybe a nice addition. I'm trying to set up a reference application using
MyFaces 2, OWB and OpenJPA 2 which I'll donate to Apache. Not sure which
project
Hi,
At MyFaces we also had this discussion a couple of times [1] and, while most
of us liked Slf4j, we chose to go for JUL [2], because of the dependencies.
[1]
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.0.0
Environment: Tomcat, but probably all
Reporter: Jan-Kees van Andel
Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
Priority: Critical
When you forget to specify the WebBeansConfigurationListener in web.xml, you
get
