Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

uis! > > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, 14:36 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > Are we ready to roll it out then? > > > I ca do it whenever it's needed this week. > > > > > > Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 11:13, Daniel

[jira] [Assigned] (OWB-1270) "Extracting unsafe proxy code in an Unsafe class" backport into 1.7.* line

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO reassigned OWB-1270: Assignee: Daniel Cunha > "Extracting unsafe proxy code in an Unsafe class&q

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

#x27;ve used my standard sig and key. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openwebbeans/KEYS New release created on JIRA for the next iteration. Please VOTE: [+1] let's ship it [+0] meh, don't care [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper} The VOTE is open for 72h. -- Jean-Louis Monte

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-897) Interceptors do not work on processed injection targets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-897: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.6) 1.7.7 > Interceptors do not work

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

homas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > > Yup, i think so. > > > > Am Mo., 17. Dez. 2018 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > > jeano...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > Are we ready

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Hey, Are we ready to roll it out then? I ca do it whenever it's needed this week. Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 11:13, Daniel Cunha a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Sure, I'll close. > Thank you too! > > Em seg, 3 de dez de 2018 às 07:11, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > Mer

Re: Release for OWB 1.7.6

tm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > Virenfrei. > www.avast.com > < > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2D

Re: Release for OWB 1.7.6

I am happy to do the release if that helps Daniel and Thomas. Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 à 22:43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 22:15, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > Am 04.12.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.t

Re: OWB release for Java 11?

o.tho...@gmail.com> geschrieben: > > > I released 2.0.8 today with those changes ;) > > > > Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018, 20:29 hat Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > geschrieben: > > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> As you may have noticed, I am trying to p

OWB release for Java 11?

Hey guys, As you may have noticed, I am trying to push the Java 11 compatibility forward. See TomEE mailing list. I have noticed Romain upgraded ASM to ASM 7 and XBean to 4.12. If everything is ok, any objection if I do a release with OWB? Thanks Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.6

Looks good. Thanks +1 Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 22:11, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.6 > > We fixed the following issue: > [OWB-1245] - Add a StandaloneContextsService where singleton context is > not bound to a thread local for s

Re: Releasing OWB-1.7.5?

I have removed MP-JWT from master which is the branch using it. I have fired a new build, so I'd appreciate if we could wait till the end of it. Other than that +1 Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:53 AM,

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT]Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.4

way! > > LieGrue,strub > > On Monday, 19 February 2018, 23:12:25 CET, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > jeano...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Great if the vote passed. > Only the weekend yo review and vote is always tricky for me as I'm always > off the computer all the weekend

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT]Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.4

Great if the vote passed. Only the weekend yo review and vote is always tricky for me as I'm always off the computer all the weekend . Can I suggest when there is a weekend during the vote to give one or two more days? Le lun. 19 févr. 2018 à 22:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > The VOTE di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.3

+1 Jean-Louis Le mer. 20 déc. 2017 à 16:02, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > I did run all steps to release OWB-2.0.3. > > We fixed the following bugs and improvements > > Bug > > [OWB-1171] - @Priority and @Alternative as sterotype > [OWB-1219] - Prioritized custom Bean gets ign

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.0

+1 Thanks Le mer. 20 déc. 2017 à 18:00, Mark Struberg a écrit : > A quick note: to build this release from source you need both the staging > repos for > > * Geronimo-jaxrs-2.1-spec jar: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1046 > * OWB-2.0.3: > https://reposito

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.2

+1 Le mer. 11 oct. 2017 à 16:49, Joseph Bergmark a écrit : > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > +1 and thanks a lot for it! > > > > Side question: why CDI-SE? the controller is for EE as well I think > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.1.0

Thanks Romain. Somehow missed this thread +1 On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 23:36 Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > Apache Meecrowave is a very small (9MB) EE based server. > It can run embeded, as single-jar app, or as a installable zip via > $> mvn meecrowave:bundle > Docs are at http://openwebbeans.a

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1

; +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard > Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg > > no -1 nor 0 got received. > > I'll continue with the release steps. > Should hit maven.central shortly.. > > txs and LieGrue, > stru

Re: do a 2.0.1 release?

Yes, as discussed on the thread (Johnzon VOTE), we can do a release to include it. We also may want meecrowave as Mark said. Happy to help and do one of those if you wish. Currently in vacation so if my wife does not kill me because I grab the computer, I should be able to help :) Le dim. 30 juil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0

+1 Thanks Le lun. 10 juil. 2017 à 13:21, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Good afternoon! > > We are proud to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0 > > This is an implementation of the CDI-2.0 specification (JSR-365) which > just got released. > > We already tested it with DeltaSpike, BVa

Re: VOTE Release Apache Meecrowave-1.0.0

+1 Thank you Le dim. 9 juil. 2017 à 00:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > It's already late. I'll have a look to this one tomorrow if not too late. > > Le sam. 8 juil. 2017 à 22:20, Romain Manni-Bucau > a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Le 8 juil. 2017 19:43,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4

+1 Le sam. 8 juil. 2017 à 19:42, Gerhard Petracek a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > 2017-07-08 0:05 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Dear lords and ladies! > > > > It's my pleasure to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4. > > This is a maintenance release of our CDI-1.2 br

Re: VOTE Release Apache Meecrowave-1.0.0

It's already late. I'll have a look to this one tomorrow if not too late. Le sam. 8 juil. 2017 à 22:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le 8 juil. 2017 19:43, "Gerhard Petracek" a écrit : > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2017-07-08 0:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > >

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1135) Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16072508#comment-16072508 ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO commented on OWB-1135: -- Thanks Daniel. All applied. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-0.3.1

+1 Thanks Romain Le mar. 2 mai 2017 à 09:23, Mark Struberg a écrit : > sorry, was on vacation over the weekend, will review today. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 28.04.2017 um 17:45 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > as mentionned on the list here is the vote for meecrowave

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3

+1 Le 16 avr. 2017 00:57, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : FYI: OWB VOTE is running. LieGrue, strub > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: Mark Struberg > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3 > Datum: 16. April 2017 um 00:56:01 MESZ > An: openwebbeans-dev > Antwort an: dev@o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-0.3.0

It was a +1 Sorry for that. Le dim. 5 mars 2017 17:52, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Thanks Romain. > > Looks good. > > Le sam. 4 mars 2017 21:57, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > AAAnd finally found time to do an in deptdh review! > > Licenses and notices are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-0.3.0

Thanks Romain. Looks good. Le sam. 4 mars 2017 21:57, Mark Struberg a écrit : > AAAnd finally found time to do an in deptdh review! > > Licenses and notices are all fixed > hashes fine > sig fine > I personally don't like the oauth2 bundle.jar, but that is not a blocker > for the release of

Re: [DISCUSS] moving OpenWebBeans to GIT?

+0 fine with either option. Le dim 24 janv. 2016 19:11, Gerhard Petracek a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-01-23 11:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Hi! > > > > What do you think about moving openwebbeans to GIT. > > Of course hosted at the ASF. > > > > Would probably be helpf

Re: starting with CDI-2.0?

+2 lol Le lun. 17 août 2015 à 10:59, Arne Limburg a écrit : > +1 > I hope, I¹ll find some time to help > > > Am 11.08.15 15:05 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter > : > > >Cant guarantee to help a lot now but +1. Would be nice to not identify > >spec > >issues too late. > >Le 11 août 2015 05:31,

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.2

+1 Thanks Mark Le sam. 8 août 2015 à 06:31, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

All green locally. +1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:43 AM, David Blevins wrote: > +1 > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Jun 16, 2015

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0

PMC, committer or user, all votes are welcome. So Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:35 PM, l.pe...@senat.fr wrote: > On 01/06/2015 17:29, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I’d like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0

+1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpr

Re: Releasing OWB-1.6.0 _now_

s://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > > 2015-06-01 8:25 GMT-07:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > > >> Nope, go ahead. Thanks > >> > >> Le lun. 1 juin 2015 à 16:25, Mark Struberg a écrit > : > >> > >>> please shout NOW if you are still missing something ;) > >>> > >>> LIeGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >> > >

Re: Releasing OWB-1.6.0 _now_

Nope, go ahead. Thanks Le lun. 1 juin 2015 à 16:25, Mark Struberg a écrit : > please shout NOW if you are still missing something ;) > > LIeGrue, > strub >

Re: next release version

+1 with Reinhard and Romain. Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 11:10, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > 2015-04-30 11:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > I’d rather stay with 1.5.1. > > > > Yes I did lots of changes, but those changes only affect SPI interfaces > > which already got marked as deprecated since

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8

+1 Le mer 22 avr. 2015 06:39, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I’d like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8 > > This is a maintenance release of our 1.2.x branch which targsts JSR-299 > (CDI-1.0). > > The release notes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0

+1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > @Howard: would have been cool ;). This is not intended to work so easily. > TomEE 2 does it. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0

+1 Le lun. 13 avr. 2015 à 09:29, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi! > > It’s a great pleasure to call a VOTE for releasing Apache > OpenWebBeans-1.5.0. > OWB-1.5.x is the first version to support CDI-1.2 which is a maintenance > version of the CDI-1.1 JSR-346 specification. > > The staging repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.7

+1 Thanks Mark Le Wed Nov 26 2014 at 22:51:12, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-11-26 22:30 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to call

Re: preparing for a release

Go ahead Mark. Still happy to jump into the 1.2.7 when back to this office this week. Just lemme know. JLouis Le Tue Nov 18 2014 at 10:31:04, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > We are currently preparing for releasing OWB-1.2.7 and OWB-1.5.0. > So if you have any important feature which y

Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?

+1 This is not because we did not do it that we can not try to do better. >From a user point of view I also think it's easier Le 30 août 2014 09:01, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi! > > with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers > are somehow in sync with the spec

Re: regressions in tcks?

CDI 1.1 is a minor release so usually we keep ascending compliancy. So I would say yes. Le 3 août 2014 20:40, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a écrit : > Hi guys > > anyone knows if that's normal to get some regression running tck for cdi > 1.0? > > On openejb I have: > > Tests run: 751, Failures: 19, Error

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-986) CreationalContextImpl.toString throws NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068492#comment-14068492 ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO commented on OWB-986: - Ah ok, did not figure that point.

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-986) CreationalContextImpl.toString throws NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO resolved OWB-986. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 Thanks Andy. Fixed for you. @Romain, I did

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.6

Wow, discussions yesterday on rolling a 1.2.6 and while waking up this morning, tis is done already! Man, how many hands to you have? Anyway, my +1 and big thank you JLouis 2014-06-20 8:41 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > > Le jeudi 19 juin 2014, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > I'd like to c

Re: Added initial .gitignore file.

you are more than welcome! 2014-06-04 18:11 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > Thanks Jean, > > I hope contribute more. > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > > > Doing that now > > > > > > > > 2014-06-04 12:59 GMT+0

Re: Added initial .gitignore file.

Doing that now 2014-06-04 12:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > Hey folks, > > I sent a PR to added a initial gitignore file. :) > > PR: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/1 > > -- > Att; > Daniel Cunha (soro) > -- Jean-Louis

Re: [ANN] OWB PMC += Jean-Louis Monteiro and Thomas Andraschko

Thank you guys. I'll do my best for the project. JLouis 2014-05-28 14:52 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > congratulations! > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2014-05-28 12:38 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > >> Hi! >> >> >> The Apache OpenWebBeans

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5

Continue and here is my +1 then. JLouis 2014-05-25 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 since all other binaries are ok and this is pluggable (worse case) > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rman

Re: release OWB-1.2.5 soon?

Of course +1 Any help needed? 2014-05-21 2:40 GMT-07:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > Any important fixes for shipping 1.2.5 outstanding? > > I've fixed a bug in our proxy bytecode + we had a few other smaller issues. > Would be great we can get this released before the tomee-1.7.0 release. > > any

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.4

No worries Mark. There have been some issues with Apache emails so ... Le 12 mai 2014 00:58, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > oh, sorry Jean-Louis :/ > Of course thanks for voting! > > LieGrue, > strub > > On Monday, 12 May 2014, 6:02, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.4

You forgot mine, but not a big deal, enough binding +1 Jean-Louis 2014-05-08 12:51 GMT-07:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > The VOTE did pass with the following > > > +1: David Blevins, Thomas Andraschko, Karl Kilden, Romain Manni-Bucau, > Mark Struberg. > No -1 nor 0. > > > Gonna propagate the arti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.4

+1 Looks good Thanks for fixing the Java 8 issues. JLouis 2014-05-02 19:23 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > +1 > > > On 2 May 2014 17:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > +1 > > > > thanks Mark > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > Li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.3

>From sources (tag) --> ok all green (with an empty maven repo as usual) RAT --> ok, all fine TCK --> ok, all fine Release notes ok. Thanks Mark. My +1 JLouis 2014-04-23 9:04 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > +1 > > > > > > > On 23 April 2014 08:36, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > I'd like to call a V

Re: time to release owb-1.2.3?

Awesome. +1 of course 2014-04-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 works fine on openejb for 2 weeks at least > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannib

Re: 1.2.3?

+1 But yes I'm in favor of a 1.3.0 cause it's no really a bug fix :) Le 5 avr. 2014 10:15, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a écrit : > Hi guys > > do we release 1.2.3? main change would be java 8 support > > PS: maybe it would maen a 1.3.0 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmanni

Re: owb 1.2?

That was exactly the purpose of my side note :) 2014-02-08 Mark Struberg : > Actually 1.2.2 should be a drop-in replacement for 1.2.1. If not,then we > would need to name it 1.3.x, which is not intended imo. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Saturday, 8

Re: owb 1.2?

Well if more structural changes, maybe 1.2.2 is not relevant then. 2014-02-08 Mark Struberg : > Whoops, what did we change significantly that breaks drop-in replacement? > Imo we only moved the proxy info from InjectionTarget to Producer, right? > > LIeGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Saturday, 8 Fe

Re: [DISCUSS] retire cditest module?

+1 Deltaspike works well. 2014-01-27 Thomas Andraschko > +1 > > > 2014-01-26 Romain Manni-Bucau > > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >

Re: Expected release date for 1.2.2?

Perfect. Go ahead and thx. Jean Louis Le 18 déc. 2013 19:26, "Thomas Andraschko" a écrit : > Hi, > > i just fixed a important bug for me (#917) and i wonder if we could start a > release early next year? > > Regards, > Thomas >

Infra JIRA to create the openwebbeans root directory on svn dist repo

Hello guys, just to let you know I opened a JIRA to create the openwebbeans root directory on https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7010 -- Jean-Louis

[RESULT] take 1: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

Vote passed with 7 +1, no 0 and no -1. +1 are: Gerhard Petracek Mark Struberg Gurkan Erdogdu David Blevins Romain Manni-Bucau Jean-Louis Monteiro Thomas Andraschko Thanks for taking time to vote. Will promote binaries asap. My wife was pregnant and we got our second baby yesterday, so I'

Re: [VOTE] take 1: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

Forgot to vote myself. Here is my +1 of course. JLouis 2013/11/8 Thomas Andraschko > +1 > > I checked a snapshot last week - worked like a charm > > > 2013/11/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > Hey guys, > > > > As discuss in another thread, I&#x

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

t; Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >>> > > >>>

[VOTE] take 1: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

Hey guys, As discuss in another thread, I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1 . This is a maintenance release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. The ReleaseNotes are available online: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=123243

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

> > > > > > > >2013/11/8 Mark Struberg : > >> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed. > >> > >> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally > shipped the release. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

tp://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> Trying to prepare the release. > >>

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix. > >> You have one, even if not perfec

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

, > strub > > > > > >____ > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 > >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > > > > >here are my two sense, cause it does n

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

g of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > > > > > > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> From:

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently failing > of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > > > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > > &

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

I'll plan on jumping in for him to > get > > the release started. > > > > > > -David > > > > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Ok lemme at least try

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

> LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 > > Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > > > Lol > > I've be

Re: Time for 1.2.1?

Lol I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some fixes but I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so. Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" a écrit : > Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? > > > -David > >

Re: Release OpenWebbeans

Marc, any feedback on your tests? I will be unavailable those 2 days but by the end of the week, I'd like to start the process. JLouis 2013/9/6 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Hello, > > Thanks for the feedback guys. > Waiting until Monday is enough for you Mark? Or do you need more

Re: Release OpenWebbeans

; > Otherwise I think we are pretty fine right now. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Thur

Release OpenWebbeans

Hey guys, would it be possible to release OWB? Or are we waiting something (fixes, new features, etc). I'd be more than happy to work on as much as possible if someone could teach me for this first time. Thanks, -- Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

Ok guys, here is also my +1 (event if the vote is closed). Apologize for my late answer, was out of the office. Jean-Louis 2013/5/22 Mark Struberg > The VOTE has passed with the following count: > > +1: Romain, Gerhard, Gurkan, Joe, Mark > +1 from non-pmc: Karl Kilden, Thomas Andraschko > +0:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3

+1 JLouis 2013/5/14 Mark Struberg > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Mark Struberg > > To: openwebbeans-dev > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2013, 8:45 > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3 > > > > Hi! > > > > This is now a s

Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0

+1 Gerhard, would be great. With OpenJPA and now OWB, we can think about TomEE I guess :) Jean-Louis 2013/4/24 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordp

Adding legal stuff to website

Hi, Just added some legal stuff as required in this page. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs Committed everything and it looks good to me. Lemme know if not ;-) -- Jean-Louis

Re: Go ahead with CDI 1.1

Definitely +1 for 2.0 2013/4/11 Mark Struberg > I'd say we keep 1.2 as CDI-1.0 and implement CDI-1.1 in 2.0. > > Reason is that this will allow TomEE-1.6.x to switch to owb-1.2.x and take > a bit more time to implement cdi-1.1 without having to stay on owb-1.1.x > This will be much easier to ma

Re: OWB 1.1.8

Just tried to ping Mark yesterday to ask me to start rolling a new OWB as soon as XBean gets available. BTW, Guillaume sent his +1 on both so I guess we have everything ready to start the 1.1.8 release soon. Happy to help Jean-Louis 2013/3/13 Mark Struberg > I added all the stuff I am aware o

Re: new proxy benches

Cool thx. JLouis 2013/1/15 Mark Struberg > took: 33909 (34 ms) > > > vs current 1.1.x time: > Starting the real bench > took: 5275520 (5.3 seconds) > > > No shit, I'll commit the test ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > -- Jean-Louis

Re: new proxy benches

OLD proxy and NEW interceptor? BTW, looks good! Congrats 2013/1/15 Thomas Andraschko > Great improvement, cool! :) > > 2013/1/15 Mark Struberg > > > 10 million invocations on 6 different methods each time: > > > > with the new proxies + new interceptors: > > Starting the real bench > > took:

Re: quick hangout about proxy refactoring

Hi guys, I was not available at that time. Apologize. What are the outcomes? Any way to move forward? Jean-Louis 2012/12/29 Mark Struberg > Hi folks! > > I already created a few jira bugs and wrote a few mails about this topic - > without much response so far. > Gerhard, Arne and I will disc

Re: New OpenWebBeans home page

Footer is maybe better imo. JLouis 2012/12/13 Mark Struberg > Sure we can add this. Thought about it as well and would have added it to > the bottom next to the ASF footer. Or left in front of the OWB logo in the > header line? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - > > From

Re: bit more cms work

ok pushed a set of pages to fix templates and perl scripts http://openwebbeans.staging.apache.org/source.html http://openwebbeans.staging.apache.org/documentation.html http://openwebbeans.staging.apache.org/openwebbeans-spi/index.html Jean-Louis 2012/12/11 Mark Struberg > well, I just pulled

Re: December 2012 Board Report

Thanks Mark ;-) 2012/12/10 Mark Struberg > Jean Louis Monteiro got added as committer lately (was long time overdue > btw ;). > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > To: openwebbeans-dev > >

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-715) Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-715: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.7) 1.2.0 > Remove EL22 implementat

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-717) Remove Failover implementation from Web to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-717: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.7) 1.2.0 Affects Version/s: 1.1.6

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-715) Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-715: Affects Version/s: (was: 1.2.0) 1.1.7 1.1.6

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-715) Remove EL22 implementation from Core to Own Project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-715: Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.7) 1.2.0 > Remove E

Re: [VOTE] release OpenWebBeans-1.1.6

+1 Thanks again Mark. JLouis 2012/12/6 Romain Manni-Bucau > otherwise it seems fine for me and all TCK passed (even in tomee/openejb) > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: htt

Re: going for a walk, doing an owb-1.1.7 release?

Hi Mark, Crossing fingers. Thanks in advance. JLouis 2012/12/5 Mark Struberg > hiho folks! > > I'm ready to trigger the owb-1.1.7 release build. Hope we did setup the > branch correctly ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > -- Jean-Louis

Re: Re: heavy cleanup

That's all perfect Mark. Thanks for the answer. Any Jira we could work on? 2012/11/26 Mark Struberg > > > yes, either I ger commit right or I will copy them over to owb and later > move them back. > There is lots of documentation needed as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > ---

Re: heavy cleanup

Hi, does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1? Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in? I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0? Not sure it needs a 2.0, but maybe a real jump in versions would be great. Thoughts? 2012/11/25 Mark Struberg > good idea, I'll go update trunk. > > Please no

<    1   2   3   >