Which JAX-WS/RS implementation with OWB?

Hi, which JAX-WS & RS implementation works with OWB/CDI? Which is the preferred one? Is there a sample available? Thanks, Thomas

Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

Hi, weeks ago, i created an issue that OWB failover does not work anymore. The issue was a compatiblity mismatch between MSM (memcached-session-manager) and Tomcat 7.0.21 or higher. Currently we stay with Tomcat 7.0.21 and our replication works fine. Today i upgraded to OWB 1.1.4 and our failover

Re: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

t least via > web.xml. > > wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:59 AM > > Subject: Replication fails

Re: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

l use the Filter. > But you will probably never use both ;) > > Got me? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, April 25,

Rework logger API (OWB-674) breaks failover/serialization

Hi, AFAICS the old WebBeansLogger was serializable and JUL isn't. This breaks again the failover because OWB has some or many non-static loggers. It's really annoying because since 1.1.3, every version destroyed the failover mechanism. Is there any reason for non-static loggers? The non-static log

Re: Rework logger API (OWB-674) breaks failover/serialization

This loggers could be static: PluginLoader AbstractMetaDataDiscovery OsgiMetaDataScannerService FailOverBag FailOverBagWrapper There are 2 other classes where it can't be static without changes. Should we set them as transient? WebContainerLifecycle AbstractLifeCycle 2012/8/31 T

OWB-702

Hi, i have already done some refactoring, fixed a bug because passivation removes the bag from the session and added unit tests for the whole failover stuff. I've sent the patch to mark for reviewing first because i didn't dare to create a issue + patch without reviewing :) Should i maybe attach

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

Hi Mark, it's already fixed but i attached an patch with some refactoring + unittests to #OWB-702. I know that i could commit it but it would be great if anyone could review it :) Regards, Thomas 2012/9/12 Mark Struberg > 2nd try as my previous got eaten by the spam filter :/ > > > > > > -

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

lementation changes. > > Sincerely, > > Joe > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko > wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > it's already fixed but i attached an patch with some refactoring + > > unittests to #OWB-702. > > I know t

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

ple years back. > > Sincerely, > > Joe > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Thomas Andraschko > wrote: > > i know, sorry. Should i deactivate "remove trailing spaces" in my IDE? > > > > 2012/9/12 Joseph Bergmark > > > >> I started to

Re: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

Hi, i will commit today :) Regards, Thomas 2012/9/15 Mark Struberg > Hi David! > > I can roll the release tonight or tomorrow morning. > Udo still likes to get a few things done afaik. UnitTests and stuff... > > > Thomas, did you commit all your changes which you have Jiras created for? > > Li

JIRA permissions

Hi, how can i change the assignee of a ticket to myself or mark the issue as fixed? I can't find any button/view for this :) Do i need special permissions? Regards, Thomas

Re: JIRA permissions

works fine, thanks! 2012/9/15 Mark Struberg > I've added you to the OWB committers group in Jira. Could you please try > again now? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.a

Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

Hi, we have many checkstyle errors (not warnings) in the test classes. Can i fix them or should i exclude (don't know if possible in Eclipse) the test classes from checkstyle? The most errors are "{ should be on a new line" and naming errors of constants and variables. Also i have many eclipse er

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

rs: > > [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @ > openwebbeans-web --- > [INFO] > [INFO] > > > [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @ > openwebbeans-impl --- > [INFO] > [INFO] > > etc.. > > Sincerely, > > J

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

Bergmark > I haven't used the checkstyle plugin for Eclipse, so afraid I can't > provide much advice here. Its too bad it doesn't appear to follow the > same rules as the maven plugin. > > Sincerely, > > Joe > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Thomas

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

I would fix it, that's no problem. We also have many compiler warnings because sometimes @Override is used for implemented methods in test classes, which is not compatible to Java 1.5. Could i create tickets for @Override and checkstyle errors in test-classes? I would fix them for 1.1.7. 2012/9/

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

will not check it (i know i'm part of them) > > > > about @Override: do we still target j5? > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau* > > *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* > > > > > > > > > > 2012/9/1

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans build tools 1.2

+1 2012/9/16 Mark Struberg > > > Hi! > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools-1.2. > This release is needed for shipping OWB. > > > We just relaxed the method length rules a bit.Maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

Re: [VOTE] [take-2] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.6

+1 looks great! :) 2012/9/26 Mark Struberg > > > Hi! > > I'd again like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.6 . I > fixed the issues which stopped our first attempt > > This > is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been > created. It mainly contains compa

Re: New Maven Module : Failover & Cluster

Hi Gurkan, what logic do you mean? The failover logic is in the openwebbeans-web module and it's only used by the web and resource module (StandaloneResourceInjectionService). Regards, Thomas 2012/10/11 Gurkan Erdogdu > Hello folks > > In coming days I will be thinking about introduce new mave

Re: New Maven Module : Failover & Cluster

t; strub > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu > > > Cc: > > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:35 AM > > Subject: Re: New Maven Module : Failover & Cluster > > &

Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

Hi Mark, +1 for 1.2.0. Do we completely remove javasisst? If yes, i would like to so some failover refactoring, too. Regards, Thomas 2012/11/10 Mark Struberg > Hi folks! > > Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in > the API might be too big a change for a bugf

Re: heavy cleanup

+1 Will we also target java 1.6 ? 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 > > All can be done independently now normally > Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > > I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like > > > > > > //X TODO this MUST NOT be public! > > public

Re: December 2012 Board Report

Sorry for off-topic but should i have permissions to open this page? :) 2012/12/10 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Thanks Mark ;-) > > > 2012/12/10 Mark Struberg > > > Jean Louis Monteiro got added as committer lately (was long time overdue > > btw ;). > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > -

Re: December 2012 Board Report

ean-Louis' committership to the report. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Mond

Re: bit more cms work

looks great :) 2012/12/11 Romain Manni-Bucau > Looks great Mark (even on mobile)! > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2012/12/11 Mark Struberg :

Re: new proxy benches

Great improvement, cool! :) 2013/1/15 Mark Struberg > 10 million invocations on 6 different methods each time: > > with the new proxies + new interceptors: > Starting the real bench > took: 6530479 (6.5 seconds) > > > > with the new proxies + OLD interceptors: > Starting the real bench

Re: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8

+1 2013/3/18 Gurkan Erdogdu > +1 > > > Kimden: Mark Struberg > Kime: openwebbeans-dev > Gönderildiği Tarih: 17 Mart 2013 19:01 Pazar > Konu: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8 > > > Hi! > > > 2nd try ;) > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Ap

Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0

+1 for beta 2013/4/9 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 in beta mode (1.2.0.beta1?) > Le 9 avr. 2013 21:03, "Gerhard Petracek" a > écrit : > > > hi @ all, > > > > we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> imo it would be great to > release > > it within the next two weeks. > > > > regards, > > gerhard >

SVN forbidden

Hi, is there something wrong with SVN the last 2 days? I always get following error: svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/77db735f-3e01-0010-b369-8b3936c519d7': 403 Forbidden ( http://svn.apache.org) I already tried to delete my eclipse keyring, to enter my user/pw again but somehow i get thi

Re: SVN forbidden

same :/ 2013/5/1 Romain Manni-Bucau > Got some issues too, maybe try svn.us.apache.org > Le 1 mai 2013 11:40, "Thomas Andraschko" a > écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > is there something wrong with SVN the last 2 days? > > I always get following error: &

Re: SVN forbidden

Still occurs :/ Who should i contact or should i just wait some days? 2013/5/1 Thomas Andraschko > same :/ > > > 2013/5/1 Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Got some issues too, maybe try svn.us.apache.org >> Le 1 mai 2013 11:40, "Thomas Andraschko" a >> écrit

Re: SVN forbidden

t; To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Thursday, 2 May 2013, 19:36 > > Subject: Re: SVN forbidden > > > > Maybe ask infra > > Le 2 mai 2013 19:27, "Thomas Andraschko" > > a > > écrit : > > > >> Stil

Re: 1.2.0 release end spurt

Hi Mark, i will try to commit my stuff tomorrow. Hopefully it works, otherwise i must contant infra team first. Regards, Thomas 2013/5/5 Mark Struberg > Hi! > > Gonna try to start with the owb-1.2.0 release on tuesday or so. > Please look over the open issues and close what is already resolve

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere? I would try it with my current app. 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg > Hi folks! > > I'll reroll the release this evening. > > We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release > but we don't ship any binaries for it. > > The rea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3

+1 2013/5/14 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmann

Re: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

+1 2013/5/21 Mark Struberg > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Mark Struberg > > To: openwebbeans-dev > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, 19 May 2013, 7:49 > > Subject: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 > > > > I'd like to call a 3rd take to VOTE on r

ClassCastException with CODI and OWB > 1.2.0

Hi, today i tried to upgrade OWB from 1.1.5 to 1.2.0 but i get following exception with CODI (1.0.5): java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.scope.mapped.Jsf2BeanWrapper cannot be cast to org.apache.webbeans.portable.AnnotatedTypeImpl at org.apache.webbeans.

Re: ClassCastException with CODI and OWB > 1.2.0

x27;t exist with 1.2.1 anymore. > Can you please compile 1.2.1 from trunk and try again? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, 20 Septem

Re: ClassCastException with CODI and OWB > 1.2.0

A trunk build works fine! thanks! 2013/9/20 Thomas Andraschko > Hi Mark, > > i just tried a maven snapshot but i will try to trunk build on monday :) > > Regards, > Thomas > > > 2013/9/20 Mark Struberg > >> The latest 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT crashes as well? >>

Re: OWB-900 (Broken docs), Work in progress

+1 Do we already have a working CMS integration? I never looked at this. Also many links in the documentation section are broken. I think we need at least basic documentations about: - How to start for beginners - How to enable OWB features (like clustering) 2013/9/23 Karl Kildén > Hello! >

Re: Documentation layout suggestions

+1 for the second I would only merge the last two points 2013/10/1 Gerhard Petracek > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/10/1 Arne Limburg > > > +1 for the second suggestion > > I like the "Getting Started" part to be promoted bigger > > > > > > > > Am 01.10.13 20:54 schrieb "Karl Kildén"

Re: Documentation layout suggestions

hat as well? Thank you. > > Might as well try to get it kinda right the first time even though we can > update the layout over time ;-) > > > On 1 October 2013 21:14, Thomas Andraschko >wrote: > > > +1 for the second > > > > I would only merge the l

Re: Documentation layout suggestions

sorry, i mean subpage - not subpoint 2013/10/1 Thomas Andraschko > I mean this points: > > *OpenWebBeans CDI testing framework* > > • CDI Test Framework > > > Isn' it exactly the same? It the second point a subpoint or what does it > mean? > > > 2013/10

Alternative + Named

Hi, should it actually be possible to overwrite a bean with a alternative named bean? e.g -> @Named public class A with a activated @Named("a") @Alternative public class A extends B This somehow just works randomly. Every X container startup, the right bean will be used with EL. Thanks. Re

Re: Alternative + Named

> > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 21:23 > > Subject: Alternative + Named > > > > Hi, > > > > should it actually be possibl

Re: Alternative + Named

e.veto(). > > You could also try to use DeltaSpike globalAlternatives for it. This > should do pretty much what you like and internally also works with veto(). > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >________ > > From: Thomas Andraschko &

Re: [VOTE] take 1: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.1

+1 I checked a snapshot last week - worked like a charm 2013/11/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Hey guys, > > As discuss in another thread, I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache > OpenWebBeans-1.2.1 . > > This is a maintenance release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. > > The ReleaseNotes are av

Re: CDI 1.1 and openwebbeans-porting

+1 for Romains idea 2013/11/15 Romain Manni-Bucau > Hi > > +1 to set all version to 2.0 and let 1.2 be in maintanance (= replace > porting module by CDi 1.1 impl) > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannib

1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

Hi, i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception. My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's there in the debugger. Any idea? I must still use 1.1.5 :/ Regards, Thomas

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in that byte code generation/manipulation stuff. 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko > Hi, > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception. > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's >

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

> > i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect. > it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko > > > Guys, i really need your help! > > It was introdu

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

it? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >________ > > From: Thomas Andraschko > >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2013, 13:04 > >Subject: Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare >

Expected release date for 1.2.2?

Hi, i just fixed a important bug for me (#917) and i wonder if we could start a release early next year? Regards, Thomas

Re: svn commit: r1552050 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src: main/java/org/apache/webbeans/component/creation/BeanAttributesBuilder.java test/java/org/apache/webbeans/newtests/specalization/mu

Hey, i'm not exactly sure if understand your question correctly but i will explain you my code change. I think specialization per se was working fine but the old code just looked for a @Named on the direct parent. e.g. @Named BeanA @Specializes BeanB extends BeanA @Specializes BeanC extends Bea

Re: svn commit: r1552050 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src: main/java/org/apache/webbeans/component/creation/BeanAttributesBuilder.java test/java/org/apache/webbeans/newtests/specalization/mu

> the AnnotatedType for the annotation (AnnotatedType.isAnnotatationPresent) > in case a portable extension has called setAnnotatedType during a > ProcessAnnotatedType event and has added @Specializes. > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] retire cditest module?

+1 2014-01-26 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2014-01-26 Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > > > The CdiTest module is now pr

Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk

+1 romain 2014-01-27 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 on the major for each spec version (like tomcat) is fine for me and > avoid confusion with technical changes for the spec targeted spec > version (1.1, 1.2 owb versions for instance) > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmanni

Re: [DISCUSS] drop servlet-2.5 support?

For 2.0/CDI 1.1? +1 then 2014-01-27 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1, t8 is almost release so no more need of t6 integration IMO > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: time to release owb-1.2.3?

+1 2014-04-21 13:05 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2014-04-21 11:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > > Awesome. > > +1 of course > > > > > > > > 2014-04-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > > +1 works fine on openejb for 2 weeks at least > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.3

+1 2014-04-24 14:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > From sources (tag) --> ok all green (with an empty maven repo as usual) > RAT --> ok, all fine > TCK --> ok, all fine > > Release notes ok. > > Thanks Mark. > > My +1 > > JLouis > > > > > 2014-04-23 9:04 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.4

+1 2014-05-02 19:57 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > +1 Looks good > > Thanks for fixing the Java 8 issues. > > JLouis > > > 2014-05-02 19:23 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén : > > > +1 > > > > > > On 2 May 2014 17:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > thanks Mark > > > > > > > > > Romai

Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?

+1 for 2.0 for CDI 2.0 don't know about 1.5... 2014-08-30 16:16 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 -> 6, 3.0 -> 7, > 3.1 -> 8...) > > I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care > enough about version to fight for it. >

Re: You shall not pass!

Great guys, thanks! Will test my apps today! 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg : > Yes, > I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with the cdi-tck > team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that the tck > made us implement. > > Cheers, > Arne > > > Am 0

Re: You shall not pass!

Have some problems... Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible fix - please have look at it. I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException for a bean without a deviration. I will try to find the reason later. 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas

Re: You shall not pass!

p to date since we added few fixes since the > announcement > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT

Re: You shall not pass!

are AnyBean and where it is injected? > > Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko a > écrit : > > Fixed! :) > > > > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on > every > > startup wi

Re: You shall not pass!

au > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko >: > > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each tim

Re: You shall not pass!

> > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko

Re: preparing to release owb-1.5.0

+1 2015-04-09 22:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 and a big thank you! > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn |

Re: upgrade to java7?

+0 2015-04-09 19:28 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +0 > Le 9 avr. 2015 19:22, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > > Hi! > > > > Just became aware that we are still targeting java6 in trunk. But CDI-1.2 > > is Java7 per spec, so we should imo also upgrade the project to java7. > > > > Any objections?

Re: a new OWB-1.2.x release?

+1 2015-04-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > We got a few requests to ship a new 1.2.x release. > If there is no objection then I gonna start with the release process this > afternoon. > > LieGrue, > strub

Re: do we like to drop servlet-2.5 support?

+1 if there is any benefit our last customer with servlet 2.5 switched to TC7 this year 2015-04-26 19:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Le 26 avr. 2015 17:51, "Joseph Bergmark" a écrit : > > > > Perhaps I'm being dense, but tomcat 6 is at spec level servlet 2.5 and > > tomcat 7 is at spec leve

Re: next release version

+1 mark 2015-04-30 11:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > I’d rather stay with 1.5.1. > > Yes I did lots of changes, but those changes only affect SPI interfaces > which already got marked as deprecated since a long time. Also those > changes do _not_ affect any end users. They just affect integration

Re: interceptors and interfaces

+0 but why not? is it a big deal? 2015-06-08 0:39 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > in openejb we support EJB without implementation using something like > @PartialBean of deltaspike. > > The issue is then openwebbeans is not able to support > interceptors/decorators on them cause the

Re: WebContextsService errors when servlet session invalidated during request lifecycle

+1 please create a issue 2015-06-11 1:13 GMT+02:00 Adam Cornett : > If the session is invalidated during the processing of the request an > exception is thrown when OpenWebBeans is cleaning up. > > The issue is in the WebContextsService.destroyRequestContext method, which > tries to get the sessi

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

+1 tested my application and everything is working fine 2015-06-16 9:10 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Bean scanning exclude list

Hi, i would like to enhance our "known jar" list in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery with the following items: "/bcprov-jdk14-", "/bcmail-jdk14-", "/bctsp-jdk14-", "/bcmail-jdk14-", "/ss_css2-", "/itext-", "/pd4ml-", "/xmlpull-", "/

Re: Bean scanning exclude list

/main/resources/default.exclusions > > Slows down a bit when you dont have the jar but makes a diff when you have > them. > > For owb having a prop in owb.properties is the way I d go. A bit like > tomcat jarSkip property. > Le 23 sept. 2015 02:47, "Thomas Andraschko" &

Re: svn commit: r1704889 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/config/ java/org/apache/webbeans/corespi/scanner/ resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/

sure, why not. I thought the same but it's actually something like "pathAndJarExclusion". WDYT? 2015-09-23 18:15 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > really a detail but can we name it jarExclusions or something like that? > > beanScanningExcludes sounds close to what we have in beans.xml for me sin

Re: svn commit: r1704889 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/config/ java/org/apache/webbeans/corespi/scanner/ resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/

rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-09-23 10:06 GMT-0

Unify project names in poms

Hi, WDYT about unify the project names in the poms? DeltaSpike and MyFaces always prepends "Apache" and the project name. e.g. Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core API Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core Impl Apache DeltaSpike Parent Apache DeltaSpike Modules ... In OWB it's: OpenWebBeans Core Tomcat 7 Plugin EL

Re: Unify project names in poms

pache OpenWebBeans :: JSF 2.2 > ... > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>

Re: Unify project names in poms

Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-10-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko >: > > > yep

Re: Unify project names in poms

> Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com>

Re: Unify project names in poms

; then you don’t need it anyway. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 26.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > Guess it is subjective enough to not do a long thre

Re: [DISCUSS] board report OWB-2015-12

> > > > ## Health report: > > The project is a container library which is stable and actively > > used and maintained. Due to the fact that most users are using > > OWB as part of another project (e.g. TomEE) we get much feedback > > in 'in

Re: Object#method and proxies

Hi, shoudln't toString call the original toString method of the contextual instance? 2015-12-18 20:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > ATM we dont proxy methods in Objects (ie normalScope.toString()) will do a > toString on the proxy - see > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.SubclassProxy

Re: [DISCUSS] moving OpenWebBeans to GIT?

+0 - don't see any big benefit Am Samstag, 23. Januar 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > -0 doesnt bring anything IMO but dont care enough to fight on it > Le 23 janv. 2016 11:59, "Mark Struberg" > > a écrit : > > > Hi! > > > > What do you think about moving openwebbeans to GIT. > > Of course ho

Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

+1 2016-01-31 12:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > hi folks! > > While implementing OWB-1107 I had to introduce a subinterface of > ScannerService called ‚BdaScannerService‘ > While OWB deployer works find with both old ScannerService and new > BdaScannerService SPI impls it might probably be better

Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

+1 for 1.7 but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users. 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 for what? staying with 1.6.x or moving to 1.7.x? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 31.01.2016 um 13:06 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <

Re: release OWB next week?

+1 2016-02-13 12:56 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 then we release tomee > Le 13 févr. 2016 12:29, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > > hi folks! > > > > What else is missing for the release? > > Any tickets you like to get in before I go on and start the release > train? > > > > LieGrue, > > st

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

cool guys! +1 daniel, the patch looks good 2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > Cool! > > I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. > I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with > java8. > > It's necessary update this plugins t

Re: do an OWB release?

+1 2016-07-27 11:37 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 to go > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Wordpress Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > Linke

Re: do an OWB release?

any news? :) 2016-07-27 16:38 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > +1 for a release! > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-07-27 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Hi! > > > > Are there anything we need before shipping the next owb release? > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > >

Re: do an OWB release?

> After that it's just a matter of an hour to make the release. > > That's pretty easy. I can do it, but if anybody likes to jump in I'm fine > > as well. > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > &

Re: set min java level to 1.7 for OWB-1.6.x?

+0 It's probably better to do a 1.7 instead 1.6.x release if we do this 2016-08-29 10:18 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +0 (not sure it changes anything for us mid term but better to upgrade > since EOL are way overpassed) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: set min java level to 1.7 for OWB-1.6.x?

<http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-08-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > fine with 1.7.0. > > > > But then let's also get rid of JSF-1.2 support ;) > > > &g

Re: summer cleanup of old modules

+1 2016-08-29 10:49 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > If we move to a version 1.7 number, then we might take the chance and also > remove a few other old modules: > > > * JSF-1.2 ... 2006 or so... > * EL-1.0 ... servlet-24 J2EE area... > * tomcat6 ... first EE6 servlet container, but also

  1   2   3   4   5   >