Re: Release Meecrowave 2.0.0

Hiho! Will need to dig into the current state. The code so far did look good for me. Happy to roll a release if all checks are green! LieGrue strub > Am 12.08.2024 um 13:50 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Waiting for CXF 4.1.0 Release, I guess. > > We workaround'd in TomEE b

Re: Release Meecrowave 2.0.0

Waiting for CXF 4.1.0 Release, I guess. We workaround'd in TomEE by forking a SNAPSHOT and do a release with it. Am 12. August 2024 12:19:28 MESZ schrieb Arne Limburg : >Hi all, > >is there any reason, weh ave not released 2.0.0 yet? >If there is any work to be done, I would

Release Meecrowave 2.0.0

Hi all, is there any reason, weh ave not released 2.0.0 yet? If there is any work to be done, I would take that work 😊 Cheers, Arne OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 arne.limb...@openknowledge.de

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

Time to tally the VOTE. And sorry for taking so long! Here is also my own +1. The VOTE did therefore pass with the following +1: Thomas, Gerhard, Daniel, Reinhard, Mark No -1 nor 0 Will proceed with the release tasks. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 29.01.2024 um 10:36 schrieb Mark Strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

+1 lg reini > Am 04.02.2024 um 16:53 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos > : > > Hello, > > +1 > >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 07:48 Gerhard Petracek wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >>> Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg >>> : >>> >>> Hi lords and ladies

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

Hello, +1 On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 07:48 Gerhard Petracek wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > > Hi lords and ladies! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2 > > > > We fixed the following ticket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

+1 regards, gerhard Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2 > > We fixed the following tickets > > Bug > [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

+1 tested our applications and its working fine Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2 > > We fixed the following tickets > > Bug > [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValue

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

Hi lords and ladies! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2 We fixed the following tickets Bug [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not have the property 'xxx' [OWB-1437] - InstanceImpl#destroy might lead to a NPE Improvement

Re: rolling a release

Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 29 janv. 2024 à 09:00, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 > > Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > hi folks! > > > > FYI, I gonna trigger a release now. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > >

Re: rolling a release

+1 Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > hi folks! > > FYI, I gonna trigger a release now. > > LieGrue, > strub > >

rolling a release

hi folks! FYI, I gonna trigger a release now. LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

and my own +1 Which makes it +1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Mark No -1 nor 0 txs for reviewing and voting! Will continue with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 13.11.2023 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 07:16, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

WB-1434>] - upgrade > > > various dependencies to more recent versions > > > [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade > to > > > apache parent 30 > > > > > > > > > The staging repo is > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

[OWB-1434 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade > > various dependencies to more recent versions > > [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to > > apache parent 30 > > > > > > The staging repo is > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

g/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to > apache parent 30 > > > The staging repo is > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1084/ > > The source release can be found here: > > https://re

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.1

t;https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1434>] - upgrade various dependencies to more recent versions [OWB-1435 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1435>] - upgrade to apache parent 30 The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

Sure, good idea. Let's do that! Happy if you could grab mw and do the update if you like. LieGrue, strub > Am 14.09.2023 um 14:29 schrieb Arne Limburg : > > Hi all, > > congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave > with the new namespace a

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

um: Donnerstag, 14. September 2023 um 14:41 An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0 Guess the main "blocker" will be to await for johnzon 2.0.0 release ot switch to a native jakarta stack. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

Guess the main "blocker" will be to await for johnzon 2.0.0 release ot switch to a native jakarta stack. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

Hi all, congratulations for the release. Are there any plans to release meecrowave with the new namespace anytime soon? Anything where I can help? Cheers, Arne OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH Poststra?e 1, 26122 Oldenburg Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

Good afternoon! 72h is over, time to tally the VOTE! The following votes got casted: +1: Thomas, Daniel, Romain, Richard, Mark No -1 nor 0 I'll continue with the release. Thanks to all who reviewed and voted! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

+1 Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 14:13 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg: > Hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0 > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace. > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

; +1 > > > > Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > > : > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

> >: > > > > > > Hi folks! > > > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0 > > > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace. > > > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

+1 Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > +1 > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg >: > > > > Hi folks! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 04.09.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0 > This is the first release with the jakarta namespace. > We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0

Hi folks! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.0 This is the first release with the jakarta namespace. We passed most of the CDI-4.0 TCK (all the standalone parts), the full EE TCK will be passed as part of the Apache TomEE project. The following tickets got res

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

+1 Am Mo., 4. Sept. 2023 um 12:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla : > +1 > > Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 11:41 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg: > > hi folks! > > > > I'll start an OWB release soon. > > We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

+1 Am Montag, dem 04.09.2023 um 11:41 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg: > hi folks! > > I'll start an OWB release soon. > We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and > it is used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since > then and nee

Re: Gonna release the OWB master

Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 4 sept. 2023 à 13:42, Mark Struberg a écrit : > hi folks! > > I'll start an OWB release soon. > We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and it > is used in TomE

Gonna release the OWB master

hi folks! I'll start an OWB release soon. We finished our work for the OWB core container over 2 months ago and it is used in TomEE since then. DeltaSpike is also using it since then and needs an OWB release to be able to release DeltaSpike. So far no error or show stopper got reported,

Re: Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

pendencies into > > Meecrowave? > > > > I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to > > have a minor release soon? > > > > Thanks & Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20 > >

Re: Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

ook at [1] to get up 2 date dependencies into > Meecrowave? > > I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to > have a minor release soon? > > Thanks & Gruß > Richard > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20 >

Meecrowave Deps Update + Release?

Hi, can someone take a look at [1] to get up 2 date dependencies into Meecrowave? I would love to see a version with updated deps soon? Any chance to have a minor release soon? Thanks & Gruß Richard [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/pull/20

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

anni-Bucau a écrit : > * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now > * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway) > * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including > cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for > me is to pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

I've created a few tickets but not all yet. Just wanted to get the most obviously broken tests out of the way. LieGrue, strub > Am 09.02.2023 um 02:17 schrieb David Blevins : > > > >> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

. I can confirm it does build > fine with 11. > > Are we open to using 11 for 4.0.0 and waiting till the next release to go to > 17? > > > -David > > >> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> hi folks! >> >> We are

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

For reference: > The TCKs will be compiled at the Java SE 11 level. In order to allow for runtimes beyond Java SE 11, the TCK will also need to be (successfully) executed with Java SE 17. > How a Compatible Implementation supports the Java SE 11 runtime (or above) will be left as a vendor-defined

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

Both CDI 4.0 and the Jakarta EE Core/Webprofile/Platform specs all support Java 11 or higher in the spec and on the spec page. - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/ - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/coreprofile/10/ -David > On Feb 8, 2023, at 10:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

Hi David, Guess 17 is a prerequisite of the spec so no real choice afaik until we dont comply to the api. For j11/cdi3 our previous shades do the job. Tck filters+jira links are in the testng xml config if it helps. Romain Le jeu. 9 févr. 2023 à 02:17, David Blevins a écrit : > > > > On Jan 3

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

> On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they > assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for > Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the > same @

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

Looks like we’ve set the Java version to 17. I can confirm it does build fine with 11. Are we open to using 11 for 4.0.0 and waiting till the next release to go to 17? -David > On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > hi folks! > > We are up and running with p

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

er it, no SPI needed (it is mainly a CDI extension) but must be supported OOTB to be a final release, 3. Nothing is blocked once again, doing an pre-release does not block anything, just reflect the status of the project. If we want to do a final which does not target CDI (current main) we h

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

nt it fully it seems. >> I really don't want to be blocked by a mess in the spec. >> > > Strictly speaking it was a stupid spec decision but it is not a mess. > Make it optional, yes, but not missing in a final release targetting this > spec version. Literally means

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

was a stupid spec decision but it is not a mess. Make it optional, yes, but not missing in a final release targetting this spec version. Literally means project goal we write on each report would either be totally wrong or we freeze the project to jakartaee 9. Both are wrong IMHO on the communit

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

n the spec. LieGrue, strub > Am 30.01.2023 um 19:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a > écrit : > >> I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 17:10, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never > claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we in > the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and > rep

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

I don't see any reason for any -alpha or whatever release. We did never claim to be a certified implementation in the past, nor likely will we in the future. We try to pass as much from the TCK as makes sense and report/challenge TCK tests which disrespect/contradict the spec wording a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

* +1 to drop jetty plugin for now * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway) * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

ority the order is unspecified. > > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for > > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the > > JakartaEE rules alltogether. > > > > > > Things I want to change yet befor

Re: [DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

d break the > JakartaEE rules alltogether. > > > Things I want to change yet before the release: > > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone > wants to contribute fixes to it. > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite > parts. > > > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >

[DISCUSS] Release OWB-4.0.0?

e order is unspecified. * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the JakartaEE rules alltogether. Things I want to change yet before the release: * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd ke

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

Hi! Sorry for taking so long! The VOTE is closed with 4 +1: Reinhard, Romain, Jean-Babtiste, Mark I'll continue with the release steps. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 29.12.2022 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

t;https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - upgrade >>> apache parent to 29 >>> - [MEECROWAVE-325 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - Update to >>> CXF-3.5.5 >>> - [MEECROWAVE-326 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

ache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-324>] - upgrade >>apache parent to 29 >>- [MEECROWAVE-325 >><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-325>] - Update to >>CXF-3.5.5 >>- [MEECROWAVE-326 >><https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

ssues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - Upgrade to >log4j2-2.19.0 > > > The staging repo is at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/ > > The source release can be found at > Index of > /repositories/orgapacheopenwe

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.15

VE-325>] - Update to CXF-3.5.5 [MEECROWAVE-326 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-326>] - Upgrade to log4j2-2.19.0 The staging repo is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1082/ The source release can be found at https://re

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

; écrit : > > > > > >> Hi Mark, > > >> > > >> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5? > > >> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps chnages before > > since we > > >> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree. >

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

crit : > > > >> Hi Mark, > >> > >> Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5? > >> Seems not done on master but we need to check deps chnages before > since we > >> must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree. > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

>> >> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg a >> écrit : >> >>> I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with >> an >>> updated CXF. >>> >>> You've got about 12h to stop me ;) >>> >>> txs and LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

eneral with cxf heterogeneous tree. > > Romain > > > > Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > > I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with > an > > updated CXF. > > > > You've got about 12h to stop me ;) > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

Hi Mark, Do you mean 4.0.0 ir 3.5.5? Seems not done on master but we need to check deps chnages before since we must exclude most of them in general with cxf heterogeneous tree. Romain Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 21:10, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I'd like to roll the release for a new Me

[DISCUSS] release a new Meecrowave version tomorrow?

I'd like to roll the release for a new Meecrowave version tomorrow with an updated CXF. You've got about 12h to stop me ;) txs and LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

hi! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1: Romain, Jean-Baptiste, Reini, Mark No -1 nor 0 got casted. I'll continue with the release steps. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > > I'd like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

t; Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg : >>> >>> Hi lords and ladies! >>> >>> >>> I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14 >>> >>> Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 whic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

or releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14 > > > > Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is > > currently under release as well. > > Information can be found here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh > > <ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

> > > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14 > > > > Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is > currently under release as well. > > Information can be found here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 30.04.2022 um 15:21 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > > I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14 > > Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is currently > under relea

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14

Hi lords and ladies! I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache Meecrowave 1.2.14 Please note that this VOTE is depending on Johnzon-1.2.18 which is currently under release as well. Information can be found here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6m9zc1p60f8wod5ycj1c290835n363sh &

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

Sounds good Le ven. 29 avr. 2022 à 11:36, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Johnzon is pretty much ready. Will likely start a release soonish and then > immediately also run the release tasks for MW, ok? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 26.04.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Romain Mann

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

Johnzon is pretty much ready. Will likely start a release soonish and then immediately also run the release tasks for MW, ok? LieGrue, strub > Am 26.04.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Well it is a matter of a week, since we didn't release for upgrades since >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

Well it is a matter of a week, since we didn't release for upgrades since the beginning of the year and several were containing CVE fixes - but all upgradable without patching our code - I don't think we have to urge so we can likely wait for it and not chain releases which is always pe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

I read it and it doesn't sound like that is something which is just around the corner. So I'd rather release mw now and let's do a follow up release in a few weeks? LieGrue, strub > Am 26.04.2022 um 10:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Can we await for David's

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

hub <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 26 avr. 2022 à 09:18, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > Any reason not to start a mw re

[DISCUSS] Release Meecrowave-1.2.14

Hi folks! Any reason not to start a mw release today? We've ironed out a few glitches and updated some libs. Will start in about 3 hours if nobody speaks out against it. txs and LieGrue, strub

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

Which makes 4 +1 (enough bindings) so this vote passes, thank you all! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

+1 Le lun. 7 févr. 2022 à 22:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 06.02.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 06.02.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

My own +1, we still miss one binding to close this vote guys Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

+1 Am Do., 3. Feb. 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26. > > Here is the changelog: > > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401 > Make interceptor injecte

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26

Hi all, Here is the vote for Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.26. Here is the changelog: [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1401 Make interceptor injected method array sorted to be deterministic in proxy classes

2.0.26 release bag

anything pending to release or should we go? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

Hi! The VOTE did pass with the following +1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Reinhard, Arne, Mark txs all! gonna continue with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 14.12.2021 um 23:32 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Good evening! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on Releasing Apac

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

Time to tally the VOTE. The VOTE did pass with the following +1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Jon, Reinhard, Arne, Mark No -1 nor 0 thank you all! I'll gonna continue with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 14.12.2021 um 23:24 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D&reserved=0> > > Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04 > An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8tjmukdm1NxhXQMkn4VnESiBI216kXvh%2Fjb7%2FFYI0kE%3D&reserved=0> > > Von: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04 > An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOT

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04 An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13 +1 Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau&

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 um 15:04 An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2 +1 Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

ra/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] - > [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers > [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] - > upgrade various dependencies to latest versions > [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 lg reini > Am 14.12.2021 um 23:24 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25. > > The following tickets have been resolved: > Bug > > [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops > firing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 Jon On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:24 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25. > > The following tickets have been resolved: > Bug > > [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops > firing Proce

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

es.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] > - > > [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers > > [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] > - > > upgrade various dependencies to latest versions > > [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 08:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

OWAVE-303 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-303>] - > [jpa] extension can leak closed entity managers > [MEECROWAVE-305 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-305>] - > upgrade various dependencies to latest versions > [MEECROWAVE-306 <htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

[VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.13

dependencies to latest versions [MEECROWAVE-306 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-306>] - Update to OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 Note that this release requires OWB-2.0.25 which is available in the staging repo as posted in the other VOTE thread. The staging repo can be found a

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25 - take 2

Hi lords and ladies! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25. The following tickets have been resolved: Bug [OWB-1393 ] - OWB stops firing ProcessObserverMethods event, when Extension with non system event observer exists

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

gonna do the OWB and MW release later tonight. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 13.12.2021 um 19:26 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > Yep, +1 from my side > > Mark Struberg schrieb am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021, > 18:09: > >> Hi Thomas! >> >> Did the co

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.25

Yep, +1 from my side Mark Struberg schrieb am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021, 18:09: > Hi Thomas! > > Did the commit solve your issue at least well enough? > Can I run the release steps? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 13.12.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Thomas Andraschko &

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >