Re: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Gerhard Petracek
:36 AM Subject: Re: javassist removal Hi David, Is it for performance reasons that you prefer to switch from Javassist to ASM (http://swapnil84.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/asm-vs-javassist/) ? What could be the impact for existing projects (or side effect) when they will upgrade

Re: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
...@gmail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 8:36 AM Subject: Re: javassist removal Hi David, Is it for performance reasons that you prefer to switch from Javassist to ASM (http://swapnil84.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/asm-vs-javassist

Re: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Sven Linstaedt
Hi, sounds like you have something similar to commons-proxy [1] in mind, when creating an abstraction of the proxy class generation library. Have you already considered using it? br, Sven [1] https://commons.apache.org/proxy/ 2012/8/9 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Hey All, Heads

Re: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread David Blevins
On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Charles Moulliard wrote: Hi David, Is it for performance reasons that you prefer to switch from Javassist to ASM (http://swapnil84.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/asm-vs-javassist/) ? Pretty much. Slower, consumes more memory and generally overkill. The code to

Yan: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Gönderildiği Tarih: 9 Ağustos 2012 7:27 Perşembe Konu: javassist removal Hey All, Heads up that I'd like to investigate removing javassist and replacing it with some simple ASM code to create subclass based proxies.  The proxy code is the small part, the bigger part is refactoring out

Re: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Matt Benson
Speaking from the Commons side of the fence, if you are already bridging APIs in OpenEJB resulting from use of the InvocationHandler interface, and particularly if you are considering abandoning this in favor of some other abstraction, Commons [proxy]'s Interceptor|Invoker|ObjectProvider (for

Re: Yan: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Struberg
: Yan: javassist removal Hello David I favor that we can implement a common SPI like other integrations and refactor code to use SPI (Pluggable way of using javassist or ASM). Thanks. Gurkan Kimden: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com

Re: Yan: javassist removal

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Struberg
gnnn... s/no movin/not moving/ :) - Original Message - From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 9:31 PM Subject: Re: Yan: javassist removal I fear this is not easy to do. Either we