Hi!
I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that I
do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent
portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add it to
openwebbeans-jsf but to a new 'extensions' module.
This also has
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that
I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent
portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add
Thanks!
--Gurkan
2010/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
http://markmail.org/list/org.apache.openwebbeans.dev
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
The structure is fine as it is.
+1 and Option 3 :)
2010/1/12 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;)
artifactIdopenwebbeans-jsf/artifactId
The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support
both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps.
LieGrue,
At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the
javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped.class and the corresponding Context to the
BeanManager - kawumms, because the ViewScoped.class is not available in
JSF-1.2
Maybe I did not explain it better, but OWB uses JSF2 not JSF 1.2. Look at
I apologize to everyone for the previous mail.
Just I'm not recognized that mail is sent to dev list.
2010/1/12 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
Hi Jean
You can continue to work on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-183
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/1/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
create a way to dynamically add Extensions to our tests
---
Key: OWB-226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-226
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: New Feature
