fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add it to openwebbeans-jsf but to a new 'extensions' module. This also has

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add

Re: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?)

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Subject: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?) To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:07 AM On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com Subject: Re: fully going JSF2? To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 12:46 PM This also has the side effect that we now for the first time really use JSF2 functionality, and thus it would not be possible to use OWB