I just submitted a PR to improve performances of the Go/ActionLoop runtime
while being the less invasive possible.
I am keeping the current design and I have not changed approach: there is still
child process fed by the HTTP server on standard input with output on file
descriptor 3. I am still
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:28 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...as long as it includes "Apache.OpenWhisk" (fully qual. name)
> in the path then it looks good to me as well
Same here, +1
-Bertrand
Casing is always domain-specific... so if Mixed case is the convention for
.NET/C# then as long as it includes "Apache.OpenWhisk" (fully qual. name)
in the path then it looks good to me as well.
Kind regards,
Matt
From: Rodric Rabbah
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 11/27/2018
Thanks Shawn for following up. This makes sense to me.
We’ll need to add some travis integration into the repo to run the tests, and
push the image to dockerhub.
Then we can open a PR against Openwhisk to add the new runtime to the manifest
and update some docs.
-r
> On Nov 27, 2018, at 11:53
All,
Sorry for the long delay in response to this, but I just wanted to follow up.
For the .NET runtime, is Apache.OpenWhisk an acceptable namespace (similar to a
package name in the JVM world)?
While .NET namespaces are similar to Java packages in terms of purpose, they
differ in one area --
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:22 AM David P Grove wrote:
> ...Bertrand, I have listed you as the officer/member managing the donation in
> the IP clearance form. Please take a look at the IP clearance form and
> let me know if there are any changes/corrections I should make before I
> start
