Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

2020-02-03 Thread Dominic Kim
+1 to release rc2 of openwhisk-client-js v3.21.0 imac27:tmp style95$ ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2 rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F 9783 03D8 A395 2AA9 01A0) working in the following directory: /var/folders/jc/wfhtkrln4q7cz9pxz24rbkdmgp/T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

2020-02-03 Thread Rob Allen
Hi, +1 to release version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of OpenWhisk Client Js Checked with rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F 9783 03D8 A395 2AA9 01A0) Regards, Rob > On 3 Feb 2020, at 16:18, Rodric Rabbah wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

2020-02-03 Thread David P Grove
+1 to release rc2 of openwhisk-client-js v3.21.0. manually inspected and checked with rcverify (log appended). --dave Daves-MacBook-Pro:tools dgrove$ ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-client-js 'OpenWhisk Client Js' 3.21.0 rc2 rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 4B4E 170B 32B7 314E 564F 9783 03D8 A395 2AA9 01A0)

[CANCELED rc1 VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc1)

2020-02-03 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Hello, this vote on rc1 is cancelled because I signed the rc1 candidate with my personal id instead of my Apache id. A new rc2 with updated instructions was just sent out. (Thanks Dave for catching it.) -r On 2020/02/02 20:49:57, "David P Grove" wrote: > I'm having problems verifying the det

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.0, rc2)

2020-02-03 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Hi, This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.21.0 release candidate rc2 of the following project module with artifacts built from the Git repositories and commit IDs listed below. * OpenWhisk Client Js: 7c402436c24d564088917a8013e68dc9c9c8a9dc https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/c

Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request

2020-02-03 Thread Michele Sciabarra
This is basically also what I am trying to do. I guess the difference is that you are doing this using the standard nodejs runtime while I am doing the same using the goproxy. I am sure it is also similar to the adobe/wskdebug that I tried to use, and works but it specific to the node and java

[slack-digest] [2020-02-02] #kubernetes

2020-02-03 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2020-02-02 08:20:55 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Hi all, I have recently started to explore scheduling for serverless functions. If I deploy OpenWhisk using Kubernetes, what mechanisms does the Invoker use to run actions? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C4J3R7JFL/p1580631655017300?thread_ts=158

[slack-digest] [2020-02-02] #performance

2020-02-03 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2020-02-02 21:39:12 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Hello there, I was wondering if there are tests that measure the performance of different OpenWhisk components. For example, how many Action invocations can the Controller schedule every second or what is the Invoker’s latency/overhead? https://openwhisk-

Re: Preview of a OpenWhisk IDE & Debugger... and an help request

2020-02-03 Thread Dominic Kim
Thank you for the details. It seems what you are tying now is similar with our approach and can be aligned with ours too as it is generic like you said. We enabled the debugging of Nodejs runtime with chrome DevTools protocol https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/. Our UI communicates