Yeah I agree putting a short statement/disclaimer on the state on the
repo’s README that way is clear that “use on your own risk or it might take
time before someone responds to an issue”
It also could have a link back to the wiki page.
— Carlos
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:33 AM Michael Marth
wro
Hi Carlos,
I am not sure if the people new to OpenWhisk would look at that table. I, for
one, was not even aware it existed (
How about putting a badge/note at the top of the experimental repo’s READMEs?
That would probably be seen.
Additional benefit: the badge could be raised as a PR against t
Hi Michael
I got the list by going over every repo recently and reviewing latest
state. Which for the most part I follow all changes, PR, issues to every
OpenWhisk repo :-)
What do you think if we add a column to the Repo Status Wiki page?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Gi
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for sharing that!
Slide 4 made me wonder on the distinction between “maintained” repos and
“experimental” repos. I totally agree that this distinction exists in practice,
but I wondered how you got to the list. And I should add: I don’t dispute the
repos you put on the “experi
This week I gave a talk internal in IBM to illustrate the work recently
done in braking openwhisk components into multiple repositories, and how we
integrate them in our downstream deployment.
Some slides I think are useful to share with the community it gives a map
where are components located.
