Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi John, For some reason my emailprogram hides your replies. So I missed your last message. This week we were required to upgrade to the latest 2.0 code. But we could not upgrade due to the original issue I described. So I was very lucky to see your last reply when I was searching for this

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi, I have a new solution for this problem. I’m going to make FontMapper into an interface and have a singleton instance available via FontMappers.instance(). You’ll be able to provide your own implementation via FontMappers.set(FontMapper) and the current FontMapper code will be moved to

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

> Hi, > > Sorry, please can you answer all of the questions in my previous mail or I >> can’t help you. >> > > Not sure whether I need any help right now. All I wanted to do is to vote > for the "per-document FontMapper or FontProvider" solution and explain some > reasons for that. > I'm still

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

where in the next year. If you say having a > non-static FontMapper would break all the APIs and postpone the 2.0 release > by yet another year, I will rather live with what we have now. > > Best regards, > Petr. > > -----Původní zpráva- From: John Hewson > Sent: Wednesda

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi, Sorry, please can you answer all of the questions in my previous mail or I can’t help you. Not sure whether I need any help right now. All I wanted to do is to vote for the "per-document FontMapper or FontProvider" solution and explain some reasons for that. Now searching for question

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Just a reminder from your favorite standards person… While it is permissible (well, not mentioned as such) to substitute a local font for an embedded font in ISO 32000 (aka regular PDF), it is FORBIDDEN in all of the subset standards. So if you are going to be rendering PDF/A, PDF/X, etc. -

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

d postpone the 2.0 release by yet another year, I will rather live with what we have now. Best regards, Petr. -Původní zpráva- From: John Hewson Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 4:43 AM To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842 On 1 Sep 2015, at 06:12,

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi Cornelis, > On 1 Sep 2015, at 05:26, Cornelis Hoeflake wrote: > > Sorry for my delayed reply, I missed your reply for some reason... > > 2015-08-24 20:54 GMT+02:00 John Hewson : > >> Hi Cornelis, >> >>> On 24 Aug 2015, at 02:20, Cornelis Hoeflake

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

rom: Cornelis Hoeflake > Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:26 PM > To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org > Subject: Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842 > > Sorry for my delayed reply, I missed your reply for some reason... > > 2015-08-24 20:54 GMT+02:00 John Hewson <

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Sorry for my delayed reply, I missed your reply for some reason... 2015-08-24 20:54 GMT+02:00 John Hewson : > Hi Cornelis, > > > On 24 Aug 2015, at 02:20, Cornelis Hoeflake > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In the before PDFBOX-2842 situation we set the

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

-document FontMapper or FontProvider, with the default being to use a shared static provider Would be perfect, I think. Best regards, Petr -Original message- From: Cornelis Hoeflake Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:26 PM To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: Re: Font provider since PDFBOX

Re: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi Cornelis, On 24 Aug 2015, at 02:20, Cornelis Hoeflake c.hoefl...@postex.com wrote: Hi, In the before PDFBOX-2842 situation we set the FontProvider on ExternalFonts to a thread bound font provider (uses ThreadLocal). This is done because we have a systemen where multiple customers

RE: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842

Hi, There is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2539 Thanks -Original Message- From: Cornelis Hoeflake [mailto:c.hoefl...@postex.com] Sent: 24 August 2015 10:20 To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: Font provider since PDFBOX-2842 Hi, In the before PDFBOX-2842 situation we set