Re: PDFBox january 2010 report due

2010-01-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sounds good to me. I have nothing to add. Thanks for writing this up! On 14.01.2010 10:38:28 Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > Hi, > > here's a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. > Please have a look at it. This is the last monthly report, in the future we > have > to

Re: PDFBox january 2010 report due

2010-01-15 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Sounds good to me. I have nothing to add. Thanks for writing this up! +1 BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: PDFBox january 2010 report due

2010-01-15 Thread Philipp Koch
hi, thanks for writing up the report! one side note: shouldn't we maybe add (additionally) the various performance improvements provided by mel martinez? regards, philipp On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Jeremias Maerki > wrote: >

Re: Re: PDFBox january 2010 report due

2010-01-15 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi, > hi, > thanks for writing up the report! > one side note: > shouldn't we maybe add (additionally) the various performance > improvements provided by mel martinez? Yeah, of course. When I wrote my report they weren't filed yet. What about the following addition to the PDFBox section: "We re

Re: Re: PDFBox january 2010 report due

2010-01-16 Thread Daniel Wilson
+1 2010/1/15 Andreas Lehmkühler > Hi, > > > hi, > > thanks for writing up the report! > > one side note: > > shouldn't we maybe add (additionally) the various performance > > improvements provided by mel martinez? > Yeah, of course. When I wrote my report they weren't filed yet. > > What about t