[patch] Re: build problems

2001-06-20 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > httpd-2.0/include/util_date.h is missing > > > > cc -c -I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl > > -I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/xs > > -I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/../httpd-2.0/include > > -I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/.

win32 Makefile.PL enhancements

2001-06-20 Thread Randy Kobes
Hi, Apache on Win32, when installed, also copies the header and lib files to the target install directory. The attached diff against the cvs Makefile.PL allows this install location to be entered as the Makefile.PL argument APACHE_SRC. The attached diff to INSTALL.win32 describes this chan

Re: colorizing the build's output

2001-06-20 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Another issue that bothers me is the use of globals to control the > behavior of the module ($Level and $LogFH) if somebody forgets to localize > these when overriding it breaks the behavior of this module in other > places. Should we use OOP instead? n

Re: colorizing the build's output

2001-06-20 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > OK, here is the module that handles all the issues discussed today. See > > the pod section for the docs and test example. > > looks good. could we make warnings be yellow like colorgcc? Of course. In fa

Re: colorizing the build's output

2001-06-20 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > OK, here is the module that handles all the issues discussed today. See > the pod section for the docs and test example. looks good. could we make warnings be yellow like colorgcc? i also realized that use vars is not required, just can't have the our's

Re: Apache-Test compatibility (was:Re: colorizing the build's output)

2001-06-20 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Hmm, may be we cut at 5.6? maybe we should, current 5.6-isms include: - our - File::Spec::Functions - open my $fh, ... - warnings.pm all of which could be worked around, but would be a shame to have to. let's carry on assuming 5.6, if somebody else re

RE: mod_perl 2.0

2001-06-20 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeffrey A. Stuart wrote: > Umm.. 5.7.1 is a devel release... yes? (Sorry, I meant stable... I assumed > that 5.7 would at some point be the stable branch or is perl taking the linux > kernel route?) yeah, from perldelta.pod: =head2 Improved Perl version numbering system

Re: colorizing the build's output

2001-06-20 Thread Stas Bekman
OK, here is the module that handles all the issues discussed today. See the pod section for the docs and test example. _ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guid