Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>BTW, Apache::Server->process segfaults (after rebuild), bt at the end. > > > try Apache->server->process, i'll fix the other one later. that works. >>I thought the deprecation was about not doing it on the modperl side.

Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > BTW, Apache::Server->process segfaults (after rebuild), bt at the end. try Apache->server->process, i'll fix the other one later. > I thought the deprecation was about not doing it on the modperl side. If > we just provide a glue code, what's wrong wi

Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>none of these look like an intuitive replacement for a pool object as a >>first argument :( > > > that's done on purpose. if you're not going to pass in an APR::Pool > object, you should know what you're doing. that is

Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > none of these look like an intuitive replacement for a pool object as a > first argument :( that's done on purpose. if you're not going to pass in an APR::Pool object, you should know what you're doing. that is, pretend we supported Apache::server_

Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Are we going to add the Apache::Server->pool function? we already have > > > no. but we can enable Apache::Server->process->{pconf,pool} +1 >>the C code: modperl_sv2pool. I need it for RegistryLoader in >>server_root_re

Re: missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > Are we going to add the Apache::Server->pool function? we already have no. but we can enable Apache::Server->process->{pconf,pool} > the C code: modperl_sv2pool. I need it for RegistryLoader in > server_root_relative(). I see the item of using pconf i

Re: colored output problems follow-up

2002-04-09 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> Issac, I don't want them to be off by default too. The "original" idea SB> came from SB> the gcc-color wrapper, but now I see that it has gone from gcc. Probably Don't discount the fact that there are a significant number of people who

Re: estimate on beta release

2002-04-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > Yes, the bleadperl loses CFLAGS as reported by Doug at p5p. One of the > > recent updates to MakeMaker broke things. > > has been fixed within patch level 15808 indeed :) nice work guys! --Geoff - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

missing 2.0 APIs

2002-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Are we going to add the Apache::Server->pool function? we already have the C code: modperl_sv2pool. I need it for RegistryLoader in server_root_relative(). I see the item of using pconf in startup, but why not Apache::Server->pool via modperl_sv2pool? I suppose that's because now we may have d