[mp2] segfaults when using "include" filter w/mod_perl

2003-11-15 Thread Tyler 'Crackerjack' MacDonald
Hello, Thanks for taking the time to look at this: -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<-- 1. Problem Description: If anyone knows how to fix this, please CC: your reply directly to me, I'm not subscribed to the list, thanks :-) When using mod_include and mod_per

[mp2] AIX cannot load compiled libraries

2003-11-15 Thread Kailden K
1. Problem Description: On AIX 4.3.3, for mod_perl version 1.99_12 (yesterday's CVS) Compile seems to work but make test fails to load shared libraries, outputting: t/TEST -bugreport -verbose=0 /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -d /home/xxx/install-src/modperl-2.0/t -f /home/xxx/install-src/modpe

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on Winnipeg :( :) At one point I tried keeping multiple versions. This becomes a bit complicated administratively, but more importantly, 99.9% of the time

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > >>Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on > >>Winnipeg :( :) > > > > At one point I tried keeping multiple versions. This becomes > > a bit complicated administratively, but more importantly, > > 99.9% of the

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on Winnipeg :( :) At one point I tried keeping multiple versions. This becomes a bit complicated administratively, but more importantly, 99.9% of the time older versions have bugs that are fixed in the current versi

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:20:57 -0800, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suppose Randy simply used the cvs version to make this build. That's right ... > > Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on > Winnipeg :( :)

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Juanma Barranquero wrote: > > > As a follow-up: > > > > /perl-status?inc > > > > then click on a module with functions, then on a function, then Deparse; > > I get, for example: > > > > Deparse of Apache::XSLoader::BOOTSTRAP sub Apache::XSLoader::BOOTS

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Juanma Barranquero wrote: As a follow-up: /perl-status?inc then click on a module with functions, then on a function, then Deparse; I get, for example: Deparse of Apache::XSLoader::BOOTSTRAP sub Apache::XSLoader::BOOTSTRAP () { 1 } OK The server encountered an internal error or miscon

[mp2] borked cv_dump in Apache::Status

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Something else that needs to be fixed (after t/TEST -start): http://localhost:8529/status/perl/APR::Brigade::bootstrap/FUNCTION?cv_dump Subroutine info for APR::Brigade::bootstrap File: xYÂ Package: APR::Brigade Line: 245 Prototype: none XSUB: yes notice the bogus filename. Looks like the proble

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:20:57 -0800, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, Apache::Status::handler returns 0, instead of Apache::OK or > > whatever, but I'm not sure if that's the right value or not. > > Good catch. Now fixed in cvs. As a follow-up: /perl-status?inc then click on a

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: At 12:20 -0800 11/15/03, Stas Bekman wrote: Juanma Barranquero wrote: [Sat Nov 15 17:39:17 2003] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Modification of a read-only value attempted at C:/bin/Perl/lib/Config.pm line 75. , referer: http://localhost/perl-status Yup, confirmed, th

Re: Segmentation fault

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Bobber Cheng wrote: (gdb) p r->filename $1 = 0x81a1818 "/usr/local/lxr/source" (gdb) p r->finfo $2 = {pool = 0x819fe80, valid = 7598448, protection = 1877, filetype = APR_REG, user = 48, group = 48, inode = 410325, device = 774, nlink = 1, size = 7123, csize = 1077577583, atime = 1068909622

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:20:57 -0800, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose Randy simply used the cvs version to make this build. Yeah, well, the problem is that now there's no 1.99_11 binary on Winnipeg :( :) > In fact what happened is that I started to port Apache::Status to mp2, bu

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
At 12:20 -0800 11/15/03, Stas Bekman wrote: Juanma Barranquero wrote: [Sat Nov 15 17:39:17 2003] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Modification of a read-only value attempted at C:/bin/Perl/lib/Config.pm line 75. , referer: http://localhost/perl-status Yup, confirmed, that's a bug in perl: % perl-5

Re: Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Juanma Barranquero wrote: First of all, sorry if this is not the appropriate list. This is the right list, Juanma. ;) Thank you for your report. I have a problem with the latest mod_perl 2.0 binary for Windows and ActivePerl 5.8.1 build 807. (I've tested it on XP and 2K with identical results, BTW

Re: Segmentation fault

2003-11-15 Thread Bobber Cheng
(gdb) p r->filename $1 = 0x81a1818 "/usr/local/lxr/source" (gdb) p r->finfo $2 = {pool = 0x819fe80, valid = 7598448, protection = 1877, filetype = APR_REG, user = 48, group = 48, inode = 410325, device = 774, nlink = 1, size = 7123, csize = 1077577583, atime = 106890962200, mtime = 102790

Problems with mod_perl 1.12 (?) and ActivePerl 5.8.1

2003-11-15 Thread Juanma Barranquero
First of all, sorry if this is not the appropriate list. I have a problem with the latest mod_perl 2.0 binary for Windows and ActivePerl 5.8.1 build 807. (I've tested it on XP and 2K with identical results, BTW.) I know the latest release of mod_perl 2.0 is 1.99_11, but by following the instruct