Geoffrey Young wrote:
Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly duplication: Log::LOG
How about Apache::Log::MARK?
I thought about that, but we currently use Apache::Log::LOG_ERR,
Apache::Log::LOG_DEBUG, etc for the constants, so I figu
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Now we also need to agree whether we do the same change for Connection:
i.e.
Apache::ConnRec or Apache::ConnectionRec?
Since we fully spell RequestRec, FilterRec, and ServerRec, I think I
like to fully spell ConnectionRec, i.e. my choice is Apache::ConnectionRec.
I think I p
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/01/19 11:19:45
Modified:t/response/TestAPI rutil.pm server_util.pm
xs/maps apache_functions.map
Log:
Apache::get_status_line is now Apache::Server::get_status_line
This function has nothin
>> Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
>
>
> So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly duplication: Log::LOG
>
> How about Apache::Log::MARK?
I thought about that, but we currently use Apache::Log::LOG_ERR,
Apache::Log::LOG_DEBUG, etc for the constants, so I figured to k
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 14:06, Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
May be we should take this further and make Apache::Server what
Apache::
is used to be: i.e., just the httpd accessors. And create
Apache::ServerRec similar to Apache::RequestRec which will g
> Now we also need to agree whether we do the same change for Connection:
> i.e.
> Apache::ConnRec or Apache::ConnectionRec?
>
> Since we fully spell RequestRec, FilterRec, and ServerRec, I think I
> like to fully spell ConnectionRec, i.e. my choice is Apache::ConnectionRec.
I think I prefer the
Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> geoff 2004/01/19 11:19:45
>>
>> Modified:t/response/TestAPI rutil.pm server_util.pm
>>xs/maps apache_functions.map
>> Log:
>> Apache::get_status_line is now Apache::Server::get_status_line
>
>
> This function h
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 14:06, Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
May be we should take this further and make Apache::Server what Apache::
is used to be: i.e., just the httpd accessors. And create
Apache::ServerRec similar to Apache::RequestRec which will give the
access to $s?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/01/19 11:19:45
Modified:t/response/TestAPI rutil.pm server_util.pm
xs/maps apache_functions.map
Log:
Apache::get_status_line is now Apache::Server::get_status_line
This function has nothing to do with Server. ap_get_status_line is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/01/19 08:25:54
Modified:t/response/TestAPI aplog.pm
xs/Apache/Log Apache__Log.h
xs/maps modperl_functions.map
Log:
Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly d
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2004/01/31 02:06:59
Modified:lib/ModPerl WrapXS.pm
t/response/TestAPR pool.pm
xs typemap
xs/APR/Pool APR__Pool.h
xs/maps apr_functions.map
xs/tables/current
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stas2004/01/31 02:06:59
>
> Modified:lib/ModPerl WrapXS.pm
>t/response/TestAPR pool.pm
>xs typemap
>xs/APR/Pool APR__Pool.h
>xs/maps apr_functions.map
>xs/tables/curren
12 matches
Mail list logo