Stas Bekman wrote:
I just wanted to verify first if that's what we want. Next I'm going to
fix that.
It's working now. the new accessor char is '&' and it works only for
read/write accessors of type char *.
--
__
Stas Bekman
I will report the SHA1 problem to the apr-dev list.
apparently it was added post 2.0.49, I've adjusted the test. Is that OK now?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Here is a new version of the static mod_perl build patch. I think it
addresses all the problems raised by the previous one. It doesn't
require patching httpd
at all anymore! So, here it is for comments[1]:
Looks too easy :)
Index: Makefile.PL
[...]
+if ($build->sh
Here is a new version of the static mod_perl build patch. I think it addresses
all the problems raised by the previous one. It doesn't require patching httpd
at all anymore! So, here it is for comments[1]:
Index: Makefile.PL
===
RCS
Steve Hay wrote:
The last entry in Apache-Test's changelog was added under the wrong
version. Patch to put it right:
oops, mea culpa. thanks Steve!
Index: Apache-Test/Changes
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-test/perl-framework/Ap
Steve Hay wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Steve, please try the current cvs for this test. Win32 is now skipped for
crypt, but I added sha1 and md5 sub-tests. Got the hashes from htpasswd. Thanks.
Still not quite right:
t\apr\util1..4
# Running under perl version 5.008004 for MSWin32
# Current tim
> Oh. I was just about to reply to say yes it does let the user in with
> the hashed password presented as the password.
yeah.. the reason is apparently that win32 is documented to allow clear-text
passwords for authentication. this was news to me, but I'm new to win32
httpd land. so really w
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>
>>hi steve :)
>>
>>if you have a moment, I was wondering if you could verify this scenario for me
>>
>>
>
>ah, forget it. the thread has gone on over in apr-dev@ as well as on irc
>with ryan. there are other issues in play, apparently.
>
Oh.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi steve :)
>
> if you have a moment, I was wondering if you could verify this scenario for me
ah, forget it. the thread has gone on over in apr-dev@ as well as on irc
with ryan. there are other issues in play, apparently.
--Geoff
hi steve :)
if you have a moment, I was wondering if you could verify this scenario for me
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=108566146802317&w=2
here is a default unix htpasswd user/password (geoff/foo) pair
geoff:emzquyt3brYm2
it may not be a likely attack, since crypt does not ge
> OK, I've just released Devel::Cover 0.45 which includes this change. It
> seems to work OK for me on simple examples, but I'd be grateful for any
> feedback.
paul++
>
>
>>>I need to set up an environment to check all this, too.
>>>
>>
>>Grab geoff's mp1 test skeleton here:
>>
>>http://www.a
Steve Hay wrote:
> The last entry in Apache-Test's changelog was added under the wrong
> version.
thanks steve, it should be fixed now.
--Geoff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:25:17PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >
> >>The other issue is that CHECK/INIT blocks are not being called proprely
> >>under
> >>mod_perl 1.x, so moving the CHECK/I
The last entry in Apache-Test's changelog was added under the wrong
version. Patch to put it right:
Index: Apache-Test/Changes
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/Changes,v
retrieving revision 1.134
d
Stas Bekman wrote:
>Steve, please try the current cvs for this test. Win32 is now skipped for
>crypt, but I added sha1 and md5 sub-tests. Got the hashes from htpasswd. Thanks.
>
Still not quite right:
t\apr\util1..4
# Running under perl version 5.008004 for MSWin32
# Current time local: Thu
15 matches
Mail list logo
