Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
hmm, where would this fit into A-T? can you query A-T for stuff like cpp or CFLAGS or other similar info already? I would have thought it should go in Apache::Build After digging through the conglomeration that is A-T (don't get me wrong great software, but yeeesh!) main::(./mp2bug:38):Mo

bugs_build TODO completed -Wdeclaration-after-statement

2005-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
All, Can I have some +/- 1s please ? :) Patch attached. I'll confirm this "works" on at least the following: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT and Linux 2.4.21-15.EL #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux with perl 5.8.7 and latest SVN of mp2. -- END ---

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
>>Thanks. Thats fine. Geoff, are you in agreement, this should be part >>of Apache::Test and then used by bin/mp2bug and not inlined in that script? hmm, where would this fit into A-T? can you query A-T for stuff like cpp or CFLAGS or other similar info already? I would have thought it should

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: I think that's where it should belong. It's a good idea, especially if it can be taught to do "the right thing" on all the platforms we support. Similarly, running ldd on the built mod_perl.so could be usefull too. Of course if we do that, now we have to check if mp2

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Vivek Khera wrote: > >> >> On Aug 8, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >>> Yes, but don't you have something called otool or such. I don't >>> remeber off hand. >>> >> >> otool -L >> >> You still have to teach the script how to determine which tool to us

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Vivek Khera wrote: On Aug 8, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Yes, but don't you have something called otool or such. I don't remeber off hand. otool -L You still have to teach the script how to determine which tool to use to get this information. Thanks. Thats fine. Geo

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Vivek Khera
On Aug 8, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Yes, but don't you have something called otool or such. I don't remeber off hand. otool -L You still have to teach the script how to determine which tool to use to get this information. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Vivek Khera wrote: On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: * mp2bug -- add the output of 'ldd httpd' to the report I'd really like to see this for 2.0.2 and volunteer to do it; however, I'm not quite sure how we should go about getting the path to ldd or should we just assum

Re: Question on a bugs_build TODO

2005-08-08 Thread Vivek Khera
On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: * mp2bug -- add the output of 'ldd httpd' to the report I'd really like to see this for 2.0.2 and volunteer to do it; however, I'm not quite sure how we should go about getting the path to ldd or should we just assume is in the path and