The projects current state is that no new development happening. This
isn't to say that new development shouldn't happen, but it isn't. Apache
and Perl both continue to move forward, and we are pretty lucky that the
design that Stas, Phillipe, Geoff, etc built mod_perl 2 under is
resilient enou
The projects current state is that no new development happening. This
isn't to say that new development shouldn't happen, but it isn't. Apache
and Perl both continue to move forward, and we are pretty lucky that the
design that Stas, Phillipe, Geoff, etc built mod_perl 2 under is
resilient enou
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 19:40, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> Dear community members,
>
> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity reduces
> to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache,
> projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 acti
All,
I would certainly hate to see mod_perl no longer being maintained. I use
it as a front-end for a library cataloging system that is very much
alive, in-use and updated with recent HTML, CSS and JavaScript features.
Rewriting this front-end in some other language would be a huge
undertakin
On Mar 17, 2021, at 3:40 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
> If you are interested in seeing mod_perl remain an active project, and are
> able to help maintain and provide oversight, please respond in this thread
> indicating that you are interested in performing the duties of a PMC
> member[2].
I am,
Dear community members,
As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity
reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At
Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active PMC
members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:14PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate
> tarball as v2.16:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
>
