[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15403476#comment-15403476
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3128:
---
It only fails for a LOCAL INDEX on testTa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3128:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-3128_v5.patch
Patch that passes all but one test, DistinctPrefixFilterIT.t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15403417#comment-15403417
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1488:
---
I've marked the filter as sharable by eve
Sergey Soldatov created PHOENIX-3134:
Summary: varbinary fields bulk load difference between MR and psql.
Key: PHOENIX-3134
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3134
Project: Phoenix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15403336#comment-15403336
]
tu nguyen khac commented on PHOENIX-3131:
-
this is query plan of second query (
Github user btbytes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
1. I have added what I think is cross-platform way of handling zombie?
child processes. However, I realise there are more than one such call in each
program. I'll have atleast one more push to addre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402981#comment-15402981
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3133:
We have a fix now in HBASE-16296 (thank
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402976#comment-15402976
]
Cody Marcel commented on PHOENIX-1488:
--
[~jamestaylor] That search is still marked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402939#comment-15402939
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3131:
---
[~tuyuri] - can you post explain plans fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402865#comment-15402865
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3126:
-
Let me take a closer look at things. Andrew's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402808#comment-15402808
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3120:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1349 (See
[ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402802#comment-15402802
]
Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-3126:
There is {{UserProvider.getCurrent()}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402796#comment-15402796
]
Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-3126:
+1 for 4.8. This looks like a serious e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva reassigned PHOENIX-3130:
---
Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
> Ignore ASYNC and build indexes synchronously based on co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402704#comment-15402704
]
Thomas D'Silva commented on PHOENIX-3130:
-
Sure.
> Ignore ASYNC and build index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-3133:
--
Description:
We need to workaround HBASE-16296 because users of Phoenix won't see the fix
unt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maryann Xue resolved PHOENIX-2231.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Maryann Xue
> Support CREATE SEQUENCE in Phoenix/Calcite Int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maryann Xue resolved PHOENIX-2741.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Maryann Xue
> Support DROP SEQUENCE in Phoenix/Calcite Integ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3133:
--
Description: We need to workaround HBASE-16296 because users of Phoenix
won't see the fix unti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402681#comment-15402681
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3133:
---
Would you mind taking a look at this one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3133:
--
Description: We need to workaround (was: [~an...@apache.org] - mind
taking a look at this on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain resolved PHOENIX-3121.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Queries with filter and reverse scan failing when limit is a multiple of
Samarth Jain created PHOENIX-3133:
-
Summary: Investigate why offset queries with reverse scan take a
long time
Key: PHOENIX-3133
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3133
Project: Phoeni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402665#comment-15402665
]
Thomas D'Silva commented on PHOENIX-3120:
-
Sorry about that, I have committed a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402666#comment-15402666
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3121:
---
The patch didn't help for the case with o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402647#comment-15402647
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3126:
---
I'm starting to think we should get this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402639#comment-15402639
]
Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3126:
-
Different users can't share a connect
Github user btbytes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73030368
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -18,64 +18,58 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
#
Github user btbytes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73028883
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -18,64 +18,58 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
#
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
> quite a bit of this script is to poke the environment .. which is I/O.
Unit testing may not yield much. But, i'll take a fresh look.
Yeah, I can understand where you're coming from. It
Github user btbytes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
I'd definitely love add unit tests by breaking up the functionality into
testable parts. I have couple of concerns:
1. the use of globals, esp in the common module -- `phoenix_utils`. If we
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
Left a few comments for you inline. Overall, I like the changes. Would love
to see corresponding ones made for sqlline.py initially (we tend to make
changes to one in the other as well). I don't t
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73025653
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -18,64 +18,58 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
###
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73024725
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -18,64 +18,58 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
###
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73024268
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -86,73 +80,83 @@ def get_serialization():
return default_serialization
return stdout
-i
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186#discussion_r73024052
--- Diff: bin/sqlline-thin.py ---
@@ -18,64 +18,58 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
###
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402532#comment-15402532
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3132:
-
Github user joshelser commented on th
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
Great! I've given you karma and assigned PHOENIX-3132 to you.
> I was waiting for a response do this PR before I took on more refactoring
;)
Hah! Smart :)
> I have teste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-3132:
Assignee: Pradeep Gowda
> cleanup sqlline-*.py using python idioms
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402458#comment-15402458
]
Pradeep Gowda commented on PHOENIX-3132:
PR on github: https://github.com/apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402459#comment-15402459
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3132:
-
Github user btbytes commented on the
Github user btbytes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
1. Issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132
2. I was waiting for a response do this PR before I took on more
refactoring ;)
3. I have tested in so far as the output of the
Pradeep Gowda created PHOENIX-3132:
--
Summary: cleanup sqlline-*.py using python idioms
Key: PHOENIX-3132
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3132
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402380#comment-15402380
]
Loknath Priyatham Teja Singamsetty commented on PHOENIX-3069:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Loknath Priyatham Teja Singamsetty resolved PHOENIX-3069.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Test-only async index buil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402377#comment-15402377
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3126:
-
This is almost rather scary, but I think any
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/186
Hi @btbytes! Thanks for the changes so far. A couple of things:
1. Have you opened a JIRA issue which captures the changes you'd like to
make? We want to make sure that JIRA is the source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402064#comment-15402064
]
Kalyan commented on PHOENIX-2084:
-
as per previous comments .. i updated the code .
now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402002#comment-15402002
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3120:
can you please check the below failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401979#comment-15401979
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3111:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1348 (See
[ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401940#comment-15401940
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-3121:
is this a blocker for 4.8?
> Queries
tu nguyen khac created PHOENIX-3131:
---
Summary: improve "order by " performance with aggregated query
Key: PHOENIX-3131
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3131
Project: Phoenix
Hi all,
I found an interesting problem in global secondary index update. I am using
Phoenix 4.6.1. See the following SQLs:
create table tt (pk1 integer not null, pk2 varchar not null, cf.a integer,
cf.b varchar constraint pk primary key (pk1, pk2));
create index tta on tt(cf.a);
cre
53 matches
Mail list logo
