Re: [ANNOUNCE] Palash Chauhan as Phoenix Committer

Congratulations Palash!! On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 4:30 PM Kadir Ozdemir wrote: > Congratulations Palash! > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 9:53 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Palash > > Chauhan has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.2.0 RC8

+1(binding) Checksum: Ok Release notes and changelog : Ok Rat check : Ok Build from source: Ok Run unit tests and few IT tests: Ok Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 4:52 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Thanks Istvan! > > A gentle reminder to others for testing out the RC. > > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.2.0 RC6

e thinks is worth > > including in 5.2.0, please let me know. > > > > This vote is now closed and the RC is rejected for the release purpose. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 8:13 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > > chrajeshbab...@gmai

[ANNOUNCE] Phoenix Omid 1.1.2 released

Hello Everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 1.1.2 release of the Phoenix Omid. Phoenix Omid (Optimistically transaction Management In Datastores*)* is a flexible, reliable, high performant and scalable transactional framework that allows Big

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.2 RC0

The vote passes with 4 binding(including myself) no -1. Thanks for voting @Istvan Toth , @richardan...@apache.org , @vjas...@apache.org Will roll out the release. On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 10:14 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1(Binding) > > Signatu

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.2 RC0

wrote: > +1, > > Signature: ok > Checksum: ok > Build from source: ok > Rat check: ok > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:15 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate, > >

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.2 RC0

Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate, phoenix-omid-1.1.2RC0 The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The tag to be voted on is 1.1.2RC0:

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.2.0 RC blocking issues

Yes Viraj, almost done testing. Mostly will start the release today. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Mar 12, 2024, 9:53 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Are we good to start with Omid release? > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 1:51 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > > > After resolving a couple more issues, I finally

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.2.0 RC6

Istvan, Sure, yes will do 1.1.2 release tomorrow. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Feb 29, 2024, 9:40 PM Istvan Toth wrote: > The fix for OMID-277 has landed (among with two other fixes) > > Is there a chance you could manage the Omid 1.2.1 release Rajeshbabu ? > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:10 AM

[DISCUSS] Planning to start 5.1.4 release

Hi Team, Would like to start the 5.1.4 release process? any outstanding or blockers to include please call out. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.2.0 priority : PHOENIX-7106 Data Integrity Issues

>>> > > > >>> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 7:00 PM Viraj Jasani > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > Sure no worries, we can wait a few more days. > > >>> > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.2.0 priority : PHOENIX-7106 Data Integrity Issues

> >>> > it > >> > > >>> > > > > (like uncovered indexes) is not ideal. > >> > > >>> > > > > Releasing 5.2 and 5.3 relatively close together could > be a > >> >

[ANNOUNCE] Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 released

Hello Everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 1.1.1 release of the Phoenix Omid. Highlights of this releases are: - JDK 17 support - TLS support - Changed default commit store module to HBase from InMemory. - Various dependency version updates.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC1

Yes Viraj. Am going to do that. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024, 11:12 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Thanks everyone for the vote! > So we should be good to bump omid for both 5.2.0 and 5.1.4, correct? > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:02 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC1

The vote passes with 3 binding(including myself) no -1. Thanks for voting @Istvan Toth , @richardan...@apache.org . Will roll out the release. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 8:29 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC1

; > mvn apache-rat:check: OK > > > > Was not able to run the test suite on Mac personally. > > > > best regards > > Istvan > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 6:06 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > &

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC1

Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate, phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC1 The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.1 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The tag to be voted on is 1.1.1RC1:

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC0

at 8:07 AM Istvan Toth wrote: > >> > >>> Someone who has access to a Mac please try to track down which change > >>> broke the tests. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:05 AM Istvan Toth > wrote: > >>> >

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC0

The vote has been canceled to address issues with JDK and Ipv6 interface in MacOS Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:05 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, let me cancel the RC and create another RC after fixes with the > network interfac

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC0

48ff:fe00:1122%en5]:52934 Epoch 0 > > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,859 INFO [tsofsm-0] client.TSOClient: Trying > > to > > > > > > connect to TSO [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934] > > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,863 ERROR [tsoc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lokesh Khurana as Phoenix Committer

Congratulations Lokesh!! On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, 10:55 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Lokesh > Khurana has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on Apache > Phoenix. > > We appreciate all of the great contributions Lokesh

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Omid 1.1.1 RC0

Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate, phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0 The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.1 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The tag to be voted on is 1.1.1RC0:

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

'. === Release Cleanup details in cleanup.log Looking into the scripts. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:36 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Istvan. > > Going to make RC0 now. > > > Thanks, > Rajeshba

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

Thanks Istvan. Going to make RC0 now. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:26 PM Istvan Toth wrote: > I'm not aware of known blockers. > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:31 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Planning to release

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.2.0 priority : PHOENIX-7106 Data Integrity Issues

Hi Viraj, Would be better to include the changes in 5.1.4 as in any way it will take at least 3-4 days to complete the omid release. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:06 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Thank you Kadir and Geoffrey for your replies!! > > > How does this affect 5.1.4,

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

Planning to release Omid 1.1.1 release. Let me know if anything needs to be included in the release? On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:19 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Will spend sometime on those flaky tests Istvan and trigger the builds > manually

[ANNOUNCE] Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 released

Hello Everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 2.1.0 release of the Phoenix Thirdparty project. This project is used by the Apache Phoenix project to encapsulate a number of core dependencies that Phoenix relies upon ensuring that they are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 RC0

The vote passed with 3 binding votes(Istvan, Viraj, Rajeshbabu), 1 non binding(Nihal Jail). Thanks everyone for voting. Will complete the release process shortly. On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:40 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1(Binding) > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 RC0

; On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:49 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix thirdparty release candidate, > > phoenix-thirdparty-2.1.0RC0 > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 RC0

artifacts (or at least I couldn't figure out how to do that) > Next time you may want to include the repository name, in case it's not > obvious (multiple RCs or similar reason) > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:23 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

review and commit > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7142 first ? > >> > >> I think the guava variant change is significant enough to warrant at > >> least a minor version bump. > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:21 AM rajesh

Re: [DISCUSS] Client-Server Code Separation (PHOENIX-6053) has been Merged and Next Steps

I agree with Viraj, backporting to 5.1 after 5.1.4 release. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 10:38 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > As long as 5.1.4 can be released right away (without this backport), we > should be fine IMO. > > I also agree that if 5.2.0 is still going to take some time,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 RC0

essfully with phoenix-sandbox on 5.1 > > - Release notes look good > > - Checksum is OK > > - Signature is OK > > > > Istvan > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:49 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Please

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.1.0 RC0

Please vote on this Apache phoenix thirdparty release candidate, phoenix-thirdparty-2.1.0RC0 The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix thirdparty 2.1.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The tag to be voted on is 2.1.0RC0:

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

, I will be happy to help > > whenever > > > needed. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > OMID-240 is committed. We can proceed with Omid

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

28, 2023 at 4:23 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Viraj, > > Am making a patch for OMID-240 once done we can start Omid release. Give > me a day or two. > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:54 AM Viraj Jasani

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

> > > > >> switch to standard guava in phoenix-thirdparty > > > > Raised PHOENIX-7080 for same. > > > > > > > > >> Omid repo also has several CVE related patches > > > > >> fix all possible vulnerabiliti

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member Jacob Isaac

Congratulations Jacob Isaac!! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Nov 7, 2023, 7:37 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Jacob > Isaac has accepted the invitation to join the PMC. > > We appreciate all of the great contributions Jacob has made to

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

w > > days with OMID-252. > > > > Will keep this thread updated. > > > > Regards, > > Nihal > > > > On Thu, 19 Oct, 2023, 10:51 rajeshb...@apache.org, < > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

switch to standard guava > in phoenix-thirdparty. > > The Omid repo also has several CVE related patches. > It would be nice to release Omid 1.1.1 before Phoenix 5.1.4 to make use of > them. > > Istvan > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:35 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chra

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

port, though I am not sure if we need to manage compatibility for > the > > > patch release. > > > If we have consensus, it's fine to remove them. No strong opinion > either > > > way but I am slightly inclined to remove the support since they are > > already > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Phoenix 5.1.4 release

+1 Would be better to do few things before release. 1) Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 2) Remove the support of HBase versions <2.3.x These would just backports . I will do it if it's fine. Thanks, On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:14 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Hi, > > It's been almost a year since we had the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rushabh Shah as Phoenix Committer

Congratulations Rushabh! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, 5:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations Rushabh! > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, 4:35 AM Xinyi Yan wrote: > >> Congratulations R

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member Tanuj Khurana

Congratulations Tanuj Khurana. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 9:47 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Tanuj > Khurana has accepted the invitation to join the PMC. > > We appreciate all of the great contributions Tanuj has made

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.1.3 RC1

+1 (binding) Verified checksums:ok Verified signatures: ok mvn clean package with 2.5 profile: ok Signature for HBase 2.5 distribution: ok Started sandbox and ran sanity: ok. Ran tests from source: ok Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Dec 23, 2022, 4:11 AM Geoffrey Jacoby wrote: > +1 (binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.1.3 RC0

ted phoenix_sandbox and ran smoke test: OK > > regards > Istvan > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:12 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > > > Tanuj's public gpg key is committed to the KEYS file. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:27 AM rajeshb...@apache.org <

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.1.3 RC0

Hi Tanuj, Seems like the key with which you have generated artefacts not committed to KEYS file. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 3:20 AM Tanuj Khurana wrote: > The staging repository is closed and is present at >

Re: [Discuss] 5.1.3 Release plan

Hi Tanuj, Do you have any expected timelines for this release? Happy to help and support if anything required. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, 12:45 PM Istvan Toth wrote: > That would be great, Tanuj. > > If you have the cycles, you could also check for any missing easily >

Re: [VOTE] Release of phoenixdb 1.2.1 RC1

+1 - Signature: ok - Checksum: ok - Build: ok On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:59 AM Viraj Jasani wrote: > +1 > > * Signature: ok > * Checksum: ok > * Build: ok > * Tests using docker setup: ok > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:31 AM Richárd Antal > wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > This is a

[ANNOUNCE] Richard Antal joins Phoenix PMC

On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Richard Antal has accepted our invitation to join the PMC. We appreciate all of the great contributions Richard has made to the community thus far and we look forward to his continued involvement. Please join me in congratulating

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New VP Apache Phoenix

Thank you very much Ankit and the whole community for giving me this opportunity. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:48 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Thank you Ankit, it was great to have you as our VP!! > Congratulations Rajeshbabu, really glad to have you as our new VP!! > > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Thirdparty 2.0 RC1

+1(binding) rat-check : Ok build : Ok checksum/signature : Ok. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:54 AM Geoffrey Jacoby wrote: > +1 (binding) > > rat-check: OK > Build with master + patch: OK > verified signature and checksum: OK > > Thanks for the help, Istvan! > > Geoffrey > >

Re: [DISCUSS] The future of Tephra

+1, Agree with you Istvan. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 9:26 PM Geoffrey Jacoby wrote: > +1, assuming no volunteer comes forward who wants to modernize and maintain > Tephra. > > Geoffrey > > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:04 AM Istvan Toth wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > As recently

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix Query Server 6.0.0 RC5

+1 I have downloaded the source and build Signature: Ok Checksum: Ok Build: Ok Unit tests: Ok mvn verify: Ok. rat check: Ok. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 4:16 PM && wrote: > Resolved. thanks.It should be recorded in the documents. > > > > >

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25644

Hi Anoop, Better to change in Phoenix irrespective of HBase dependency as you mentioned set small only when really meeting small scan requirement. Usually when ever new HBase release someone take a lead and try to change to latest version. But now just we need to add a profile with the newer

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer Viraj Jasani

Congratulations Viraj!! On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 2:01 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > Thanks for warm wishes! Looking forward to continued involvement. > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 6:57 AM, Kadir Ozdemir > wrote: > >> Congratulations, Viraj! >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:25 PM Ankit Singhal wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra 0.16.0RC2 as Apache Tephra 0.16.0

+1 (binding) - xsums/sigs OK - Rat check is passed - build successful. - Ran tests and all are fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 2:22 AM Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * xsums/sigs OK > * CHANGES has reasonable content > * mvn apache-rat:check passes and `find . -type

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Omid 1.0.2

+1 (binding) Verified the release. 1) Licence and Notice - ok 2) signature/checksums - ok 3) Build from source - ok 4) Ran test cases - all passed 5) Changes and release notes - ok Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 8:54 PM Istvan Toth wrote: > Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid

Re: [VOTE] Release of phoenix-thirdparty 1.0.0

+1(binding) verified the release - ok Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 6:14 AM Ankit Singhal wrote: > +1(binding) > > * License and Notice - OK > * Build from the source - OK > * Used the above-created artifact 1.0.0 and build the Phoenix master - OK > * Signature/checksums - Ok > *

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Phoenix-thirdparty 1.0

+1 On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 8:34 AM Ankit Singhal wrote: > Sounds good to me. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:48 AM Istvan Toth wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > We have been using phoenix-thirdparty snapshots in omid for a few weeks, > > and in phoenix (master) for about a week, and so far we haven't found

Re: [VOTE] Release of phoenixdb 1.0.0 RC0

+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:26 AM Istvan Toth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:35 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > * Xsums/sigs are good > > * dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS was updated but dist/release/phoenix is the > > official KEYS file that you need

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Omid and Tephra server component from Phoenix distribution

+1 for the change as the Omid and Tephra transaction services don't have any dependency on Phoenix and they should also directly serve HBase level cross row/table transactions as well. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:27 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. > > We have the same kind of

Re: [DISCUSS] Solving the Guava situation by creating phoenix-thirdparty

Sounds like a good plan and good work Istvan! Having pre-shaded third party repo and using in most of the dependent components like Omid, Tephra avoids a lot of headaches with compatibility. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:07 AM Istvan Toth wrote: > Hi! > > I've just opened

Re: No builds on Phoenix-Master jenkins since Feb 19th?

Just my observation related tests hang or flaky ness is that when there are connections created which involves zookeeper connection then at some point of time zookeeper sees too many connections and not allow to create further connections then the cluster won't be terminated immediately and tests

Re: Re: Master branch does not compile

I am on the PHOENIX-5905 compilation issue and will fix it today. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:07 PM cheng...@apache.org wrote: > > > > PHOENIX-5905 caused the master branch compile broken, because > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.GetUserPermissionsRequest is only > available in hbase

Re: New committer: Istvan Toth

Congratulations Istvan!! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:06 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Everyone, > > On behalf of the PMC, I'm pleased to announce Apache Phoenix's newest > committer: Istvan Toth. > > Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Istvan -- congratulations > on this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra and Omid podlings as Phoenix sub-projects

+1 On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 11:55 PM Ankit Singhal wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:44 AM Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > +0 (binding) > > > > I support this but it isn't my time I'd be committing to maintaining the > > new repos with a +1... > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:27 AM Josh

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 released

The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce release of it's next major version 5.0.0 compatible with HBase 2.0+. Apache Phoenix enables SQL-based OLTP and operational analytics for Apache Hadoop using Apache HBase as its backing store and providing integration with other projects in the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

The vote is now closed and passes with 4 binding +1s and no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks to those who voted. We'll work on pushing out the bits next. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:12 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Successfully bu

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

7, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Noticed that the pom.xml.versionsBackup are still present, but that's not > > the end of the world. > > > > > > On 6/26/18 1:59 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org wrote: > > > >

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 2.0 branch of Apache HBase(2.0.0+). The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. The prior RC was sunk due to PHOENIX-4785

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member: Vincent Poon

Congratulations Vincent!! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations Vincent! > > Well deserved. > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:20 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Vincent > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Ohad Shacham

Congratulations Ohad!! On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ohad! > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:09 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Ohad > > Shacham has accepted our invitation to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member: Pedro Boado

Congratulations, Pedro!! On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations, Pedro! > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:15 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Pedro > > Boado has accepted our invitation to join the

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0

o: dev@phoenix.apache.org https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4785 seems to be a blocker for the release. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0. Thi

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 2.0 branch of Apache HBase(2.0.0+). The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. This release has feature parity with HBase

Would like to make 5.0.0 RC this weekend

Hi Team, We are almost ready with 4.14 release would like to make 5.0.0 rc this weekend. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC3

+1 Downloaded the source and ran all the tests they are fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote: > +1 > > Successfully built from source and was able run all UTs/ITs. > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Ankit Singhal > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > *

Re: [VOTE] Include python-phoenixdb into Phoenix

+1 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 > > > On 3/8/18 7:02 AM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > >> Lukas Lalinsky has graciously agreed to contribute his work on python >> library for accessing Phoenix to Apache Phoenix project. >> >> >> The details of the project

Re: [VOTE] Apache Phoenix 5.0.0-alpha rc1

+1 - Tested basic, index related queries with and without stats on large data. All queries working fine. - Verified cluster restart, region server restart and compaction related cases they are ok. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Ankit Singhal

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Ethan Wang

Congratulations Ethan!! Great Job. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:15 AM, James Taylor wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Ethan Wang > has accepted our invitation to become a committer. He's behind some of the > great

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Vincent Poon

Congratulations Vincent!! Great Job. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:21 AM, James Taylor wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm delighted to announce that Vincent > Poon has accepted our invitation to become a committer. He's had a big > impact

Re: RC for 4.11.0 by end of week?

Hi James, Ankit pointed this PHOENIX-3898. Looking into it. Seems very bad bug. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:07 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Unless anyone knows of any outstanding, required JIRAs for 4.11.0, I think > we're ready for an RC. > > Thanks, >

Re: Dropping local index on large table caused crash of region servers

Dropping local index index issues scan and in the coprocessors we prepare index data and write back to same table. To avoid the timeout you can increase scanner timeout/rpc timeout and phoenix client timeout values as well. If you have many guideposts then we might issue many parallel scans to

Re: Query with index failed when data table's PK column is in DESC order

Good catch William, Please raise JIRA and upload patch there. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM, William wrote: > Hi all >This is a very simple case, easy to repro, see the following SQLs: > > >create

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Phoenix committer - Kevin Liew

Congratulations Kevin!! Good work. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Kevin!! > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Congrats, Kevin! > > > > > > James Taylor wrote: > > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.9.0 RC0

James, Found PHOENIX-3433. It's a blocker. I think we need to make other RC. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, 김영우 (YoungWoo Kim) wrote: > Hi James, > > I have a problem while upgrading 4.8.0 to 4.9.0 rc0. Filed PHOENIX-3432. > > Thanks, > Youngwoo > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Josh Elser joins Phoenix PMC

Congratulations Josh!!! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Thank you all! I look forward to working more closely with everyone :D > > > James Taylor wrote: > >> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Josh >> Elser has accepted

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2

+1 - Downloaded source code and ran the IT tests all passed. - Installed Phoenix and ran some smoke tests everything good. - Ingested millions of rows and ran some local index related tests all logs are fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:59 AM, wrote: > +1 > -

Re: New RC?

Hi James, There is a special case in PHOENIX-3111 that if writes happen outside of the inde building there is a chance of RTBE still. Just checking it. Will commit the addendum in couple of hours and ping here. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:29 PM, James Taylor

Re: Planning to cut RC by tomorrow morning IST

It's happening frequently in our tests which include parallel create index, bulkload, deletes operations and automatic splits by HBase. Some times the dead lock happen with create index and some times with deletes. We already have a patch going under same tests. Mostly I can make final patch in 1

Re: new 4.8.0 RC?

Thanks Ankit, Here is the JIRA raised PHOENIX-3111. It's not just local index issue it can happen with upsert select, delete rows at server as well. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > I was holding up the RC because Sergey and

Re: Select * with empty result

You can use CsvBulkLoadTool provided by Phoenix than ImportTsv to load data into the table. https://phoenix.apache.org/bulk_dataload.html Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Pandolfino Giuseppe wrote: > Hi, > > i use Phoenix and HBASE for bulk load my

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.2 RC0

+1 - Verified the signatures. - Downloaded source and ran the test and all are passed. - Downloaded tar ball and ran basic tests - Loaded data through bulkload job and some local index tests everything fine. - Ran some query server related tests and everything cool. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri,

Re: Issue in Bulkload when Table name contains '-' (hyphen)

Hi Dharmesh, Are you able to write to table through normal upsert query? Seems like a bug. You can raise a JIRA for this. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Dharmesh Guna wrote: > Dear All, > > I am facing issue in bulk loading from csv files into Phoenix

Re: where are we at with the RC?

h Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully, > &

Re: where are we at with the RC?

I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it. On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM, wrote: > I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it. > -- Lars > > From: Ankit Singhal > To: James Taylor

Re: RC on Monday

I can commit both PHOENIX-3002 and PHOENIX-2209 by today. It would be better to make RC tomorrow. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:24 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Fixes for both PHOENIX-3001 and PHOENIX-2940 have been checked in (thanks - > nice work!). Looks

Regarding PHOENIX-1734

Hi Team, As you know prior to PHOENIX-1734 we are storing all local index data in separate table and colocate data and index regions. To ensure proper colocation we need customer balancer, custom split and merge logic still these will not ensure 100% colocation. That's why we started working

Please share the status of GSoC project

Hi Pranavan, Hope you are doing well? How's the GSoC project work going on? Can you please share the status of it and and also let's know if any help needed. Happy to help you. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

  1   2   >