This was just a discuss thread. How about starting a vote thread to make it
official?
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Vincent Poon
wrote:
> With 5 approve votes here, I think we can officially drop 4.x-HBase-0.98
> and 4.x-HBase-1.1
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Pedro Boado
> wrote:
>
With 5 approve votes here, I think we can officially drop 4.x-HBase-0.98
and 4.x-HBase-1.1
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Pedro Boado wrote:
> I'm OK reducing to one single CDH-5.14 branch and dropping 5.11,5.12 and
> 5.13 support for next minor 4.15.
>
> Same for 0.98 and 1.1 .
>
> 1.2 is
I'm OK reducing to one single CDH-5.14 branch and dropping 5.11,5.12 and
5.13 support for next minor 4.15.
Same for 0.98 and 1.1 .
1.2 is not really needed for maintaining a cdh branch but could still be
relevant - isn't it still the most popular version of HBase in terms of
adoption? - .
+1 on reducing the number of branches.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Vincent Poon
wrote:
> big +1
> Commits have been way too burdensome
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > Also +1
> >
> > Do that after the release? Or before?
> >
> >
> > On 6/12/18 11:55 AM, James
big +1
Commits have been way too burdensome
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Also +1
>
> Do that after the release? Or before?
>
>
> On 6/12/18 11:55 AM, James Taylor wrote:
>
>> Somewhat orthogonal, but we should move master to a new 4.x-HBase-1.4
>> branch and make 5.x the
Also +1
Do that after the release? Or before?
On 6/12/18 11:55 AM, James Taylor wrote:
Somewhat orthogonal, but we should move master to a new 4.x-HBase-1.4
branch and make 5.x the master branch.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM Josh Elser wrote:
+1
I think HBase 1.2 is soon to be dropped
Somewhat orthogonal, but we should move master to a new 4.x-HBase-1.4
branch and make 5.x the master branch.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1
>
> I think HBase 1.2 is soon to be dropped as well (maybe after 1.2.7, but
> I might be inventing that). I'm also not so sure
+1
I think HBase 1.2 is soon to be dropped as well (maybe after 1.2.7, but
I might be inventing that). I'm also not so sure about the value behind
a 1.3 release either (I think Andrew's 1.4 branch is much more relevant).
Getting to and HBase 1.4 and HBase 2.x sounds ideal to me (hopefully,
It feels like we're trying to maintain too many branches. Both HBase 0.98
and 1.1 have been EOLed. To ease the burden on devs, how about we stop
maintaining the 4.x-HBase-0.98 and 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches? An RM can always
step up if need be to do a patch release from the 4.14 branches.
Also, how
