On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> I'd like to understand if there's enough interest out there for a Phoenix
> release that works with HBase 0.96. It's my understanding that vendors are
> moving to HBase 0.98 and there will likely be no further 0.96 releases.
> Upgrade between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977831#comment-13977831
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-136:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-3.0 #71 (See
[https://bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977832#comment-13977832
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-915:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-3.0 #71 (See
[https://bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977833#comment-13977833
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-911:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-3.0 #71 (See
[https://bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977794#comment-13977794
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-911:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix #217 (See
[https://build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977793#comment-13977793
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-915:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix #217 (See
[https://build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977790#comment-13977790
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-136:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix #217 (See
[https://build
Now the dates are looking fine after following your suggestion.
I made 2 code changes in my Java code:
1. Changed the package from com.salesforce to org.apache.
2. Changed all references to PDataType.DATE to PDataType.UNSIGNED_DATE
I deleted system.catalog table and Phoenix created
Things are lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977660#comment-13977660
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-848:
--
Yes, thanks [~stack] - would you mind chimin
Hi James,
Thanks for the quick response. I will test my stuff with changes that you
suggested. I was just worried about rewriting Date Columns. This seems to
be an easier fix. :)
Thanks,
Anil Gupta
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi Anil,
> Please see http://phoenix.incu
Hi Anil,
Please see http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/upgrade_from_2_2.html for
how to upgrade from Phoenix 2.2.x to Apache Phoenix 3.0/4.0. Part of what
this will do is modify your table metadata to use the UNSIGNED_DATE,
UNSIGNED_TIME, and UNSIGNED_TIMESTAMP types instead of the now signed ones
Hi All,
We have written data into our HBase tables using PDataType of Phoenix2.0.2.
We have custom MR loaders that use PDataType so that we can use Phoenix for
adhoc querying
I am trying to migrate to Phoenix3.0.0, but all the Date type columns
values are not coming out correctly. These are big ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977621#comment-13977621
]
James Taylor edited comment on PHOENIX-918 at 4/22/14 11:52 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977633#comment-13977633
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-946:
--
bq. (from [~ndimiduk] on PHOENIX-918) I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977621#comment-13977621
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-918:
--
Agree that starting a separate separate thre
James Taylor created PHOENIX-946:
Summary: Use Phoenix to service Hive queries over HBase data
Key: PHOENIX-946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-946
Project: Phoenix
Issue T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977618#comment-13977618
]
Jeffrey Zhong commented on PHOENIX-848:
---
[~saint@gmail.com] Thanks for bringing
@Jeffrey:
I will commit the code changes required in JDBC connection string(to accept
keytab and principal) as well as the classpath that i used to connect to
cluster in Phoenix-19. Is that fine with you?
@James:
That is nice. I guess my timing was bad. I will submit the patch for Java
code. Basic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-915.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0)
4.1
Correction - it's not HBase 0.94.18, but 0.94.19 which is being voted on
now:
bq. Notable is HBASE-10847, which drops non-secure builds and make security
the default. From here on there is only one release build of HBase 0.94.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:16 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> FWIW, I belie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-911.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1
3.1
5.0.0
Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977558#comment-13977558
]
stack commented on PHOENIX-848:
---
C5 ships with 0.96.1.1. C5.1 is looking like it will be 0
FWIW, I believe as of HBase 0.94.18, the secure build is the only build now
for HBase and it's the one that is pushed to maven. You can likely change
your pom locally to this version and hopefully things will become easier.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey Zhong wrote:
>
>
Hey Anil,
Mind to create a JIRA on this? Basically we need hbase configuration and
related dependent hbase/hadoop jars to connect to a secure hbase cluster.
This issue applies to psql as well. There is no issue to connect a
un-secure cluster.
Thanks,
-Jeffrey
On 4/22/14 12:18 PM, "anil gupta"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977298#comment-13977298
]
Gabriel Reid commented on PHOENIX-918:
--
{quote}Not really ORC related, perhaps we sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977252#comment-13977252
]
Nick Dimiduk commented on PHOENIX-918:
--
{quote}
bq. I know a good Apache open source
Fixed that classpath problem with changing the classpath problem. This is
very hacky but i am left with no option because of lack maven artifact of
hbase-security jar in 0.94.
Now, the class is:
java -cp
"/etc/hbase/conf:.:../sqlline-1.1.2.jar:../jline-2.11.jar:/opt/cloudera/parcels/CDH/lib/hbase/h
Maryann Xue created PHOENIX-945:
---
Summary: Support correlated subqueries
Key: PHOENIX-945
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-945
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Task
Affects Ve
Maryann Xue created PHOENIX-944:
---
Summary: Support derived tables in FROM clause that needs extra
steps of client-side aggregation or other processing
Key: PHOENIX-944
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOE
Maryann Xue created PHOENIX-943:
---
Summary: Handle pushed down post-filters for subquery in joins
with limit and non-groupby aggregation
Key: PHOENIX-943
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-943
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977115#comment-13977115
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on a di
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11866024
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/SubselectRewriter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977103#comment-13977103
]
Jeffrey Zhong commented on PHOENIX-848:
---
The attached patch shows the differences n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977099#comment-13977099
]
Jesse Yates commented on PHOENIX-938:
-
Oh, I like that much better! I knew if I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977084#comment-13977084
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-938:
--
One option that would still go through the C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977076#comment-13977076
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-11:
-
[~russell.jurney] - We're not planning on doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977073#comment-13977073
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on a di
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11864465
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/QueryCompiler.java ---
@@ -290,6 +292,9 @@ protected BasicQueryPlan
compileSingl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977071#comment-13977071
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-848:
--
+1 to this patch plus doing the work I menti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977036#comment-13977036
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11862953
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/SubselectRewriter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977027#comment-13977027
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11862579
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/QueryCompiler.java ---
@@ -290,6 +292,9 @@ protected BasicQueryPlan
compileSin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977025#comment-13977025
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11862513
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/SubselectRewriter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
+1 for CDH5
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Skanda wrote:
> +1 for CDH5
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:39 PM, James Taylor wrote:
>
>> I'd like to understand if there's enough interest out there for a Phoenix
>> release that works with HBase 0.96. It's my understanding that vendors are
>> mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve T updated PHOENIX-931:
Attachment: pig.log
Request stack trace attached. Thanks!
> PhoenixHBaseStorage having 'Relative path in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976877#comment-13976877
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on the
Github user maryannxue commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#issuecomment-41050145
Sure! @JamesRTaylor.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976874#comment-13976874
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on a di
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11857151
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/DerivedTableIT.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,632 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976869#comment-13976869
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on a di
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11857047
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/QueryCompiler.java ---
@@ -290,6 +292,9 @@ protected BasicQueryPlan
compileSingl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976864#comment-13976864
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-136:
Github user maryannxue commented on a di
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/31#discussion_r11856917
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/SubselectRewriter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
+1 for CDH5
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:39 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> I'd like to understand if there's enough interest out there for a Phoenix
> release that works with HBase 0.96. It's my understanding that vendors are
> moving to HBase 0.98 and there will likely be no further 0.96 releases.
> U
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976508#comment-13976508
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-11:
---
FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix #215 (See
[https://builds.a
saravanan created PHOENIX-942:
-
Summary: exception in join over large dataset
Key: PHOENIX-942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-942
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976470#comment-13976470
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-539:
--
[~lhofhansl] - any chance we can get this in
James Taylor created PHOENIX-941:
Summary: Parallelize within regions to prevent rpc timeout
Key: PHOENIX-941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-941
Project: Phoenix
Issue Typ
60 matches
Mail list logo
