We definitely need those patches in 0.12. But, you can go ahead and branch
it now. We will commit it in both the branches as needed.
Thanks,
Aniket
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> It seems there are still several days to commit pig-2672, pig-3461 and
> PIG-3445. Can we bra
It seems there are still several days to commit pig-2672, pig-3461 and
PIG-3445. Can we branch 0.12 first and commit these patches to both
branches afterwards?
Thanks
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Erik Selin wrote:
> wooo :D
>
> On 2013-09-20, at 19:32 , Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > PIG-
wooo :D
On 2013-09-20, at 19:32 , Daniel Dai wrote:
> PIG-3454 is already committed several days back.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Erik Selin wrote:
>
>> Could we get PIG-3454 as well?
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On 2013-09-20, at 18:46 , Julien Le Dem wrote:
>>
>>> I'd
PIG-3454 is already committed several days back.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Erik Selin wrote:
> Could we get PIG-3454 as well?
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Erik
>
> On 2013-09-20, at 18:46 , Julien Le Dem wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get PIG-3445 in too.
> > Julien
> >
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:03 PM,
Could we get PIG-3454 as well?
Thanks :)
Erik
On 2013-09-20, at 18:46 , Julien Le Dem wrote:
> I'd like to get PIG-3445 in too.
> Julien
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
>> With regard to branching 0.12, I will try to commit PIG-2417 and Cheolsoo
>> will probably commit P
I'd like to get PIG-3445 in too.
Julien
On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> With regard to branching 0.12, I will try to commit PIG-2417 and Cheolsoo
> will probably commit PIG-3471. After that I will branch 0.12, hopefully
> over the weekend. Anything I miss?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
It would be nice if we can get these in too- pig-2672 and pig-3461.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Prashant Kommireddi wrote:
> Thanks Daniel.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > I just committed PIG-3199.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Prashant Kommir
Thanks Daniel.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> I just committed PIG-3199.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Prashant Kommireddi >wrote:
>
> > Can we get PIG-3199 in? It only exposes a few properties of LP
> (load/store
> > paths and funcs) via a wrapper
> >
> >
> > On
I just committed PIG-3199.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Prashant Kommireddi wrote:
> Can we get PIG-3199 in? It only exposes a few properties of LP (load/store
> paths and funcs) via a wrapper
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > With regard to branching 0.12, I wi
Can we get PIG-3199 in? It only exposes a few properties of LP (load/store
paths and funcs) via a wrapper
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> With regard to branching 0.12, I will try to commit PIG-2417 and Cheolsoo
> will probably commit PIG-3471. After that I will branch 0.12
With regard to branching 0.12, I will try to commit PIG-2417 and Cheolsoo
will probably commit PIG-3471. After that I will branch 0.12, hopefully
over the weekend. Anything I miss?
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell Jurney
wrote:
> +1, I need PIG-2417 too.
>
>
> On Wed, Se
+1, I need PIG-2417 too.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Jeremy Karn wrote:
> I have one JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2417 that I
> would
> like to get into 0.12 because we've had a number of people ask us about
> getting it committed back to Apache. However, if it looks like
I'll try to get PIG-3454 ready as well for inclusion in 0.12.
Erik
On 2013-09-10, at 8:07 , Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> I've cleaned up PIG-3390 and uploaded patch.
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:08:07AM -0700, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>> I'll try to clean up and finish PIG-3390 (
I've cleaned up PIG-3390 and uploaded patch.
Jarcec
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:08:07AM -0700, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> I'll try to clean up and finish PIG-3390 (HBase 0.95 support) this week, to
> see if it can be included.
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:56:42AM -0700, Cheolsoo P
I have one JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2417 that I would
like to get into 0.12 because we've had a number of people ask us about
getting it committed back to Apache. However, if it looks like too much to
review and get committed in the next week or two it could probably be
pushe
Hi, All,
It has been more than half a year since initial Pig 0.11 release. I'd like
roll a Pig 0.12 release around the end of September or the beginning of
October. Let me know if it is possible.
Proposed schedule:
1. Commit all major features (1-2 weeks)
2. Branching Pig 0.12
3. Commit remaining
+1 for a 0.12 release.
I have one outstanding JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3199.
Cheolsoo was fine with the patch (except for a typo which I will correct)
but wanted a second opinion. Can someone please take a look?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>
I'll try to clean up and finish PIG-3390 (HBase 0.95 support) this week, to see
if it can be included.
Jarcec
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:56:42AM -0700, Cheolsoo Park wrote:
> +1. I will go through my jiras this week.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > Hi, All,
> >
+1. I will go through my jiras this week.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Hi, All,
> It has been more than half a year since initial Pig 0.11 release. I'd like
> roll a Pig 0.12 release around the end of September or the beginning of
> October. Let me know if it is possible
19 matches
Mail list logo
