Hi all,
Thank you for your stories, great project. I had luck to meet many of
you personally, which I consider a luck given current circumstances.
My name is Łukasz Dywicki, born at 1E.C.7C1 in small polish city.
Privately father and husband. Technician/ironworker by formal education.
I've tried
Hey :-)
I was asking for our users ... you probably know how much I like OPC- UA ;-)
And I am certain they will enjoy.
Thanks,
Chris
Am 08.05.20, 12:05 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan"
:
I hope it is to your pleasure, milord. :)
Greetings Matthias
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
Hi all,
I did these changes on my branche. I tested it in Karaf and it works fine.
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/osgi
BR
Le ven. 8 mai 2020 à 10:24, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> Yes, that is what I suggest
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020, 16:19 Robinet, Etienne <43...@etu.he2b.be> wrote:
I hope it is to your pleasure, milord. :)
Greetings Matthias
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
Universität Stuttgart
Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und
Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
Seidenstraße 36
70174 Stuttgart
GERMANY
Tel: +49 711 685-84530
Fax: +49 711 685-74530
E-Mail:
Yes, that is what I suggest
On Fri, May 8, 2020, 16:19 Robinet, Etienne <43...@etu.he2b.be> wrote:
> Hello,
> so if I understand correctly, I should create a new module for the OSGi
> bundle, containing generic Activators that would be mentioned in the
> Driver/Transport MANIFEST?
> Etienne
>
>
Hi guys,
just wanted to make a small update. I added a "generic" trigger (mostly for
naming) and did some changes so it can be used with the new drivers.
I tested this on an S7 and Allen-Bradley PLC, and both worked!
I did the changes in the "feature/scraper" branch, but I think it would need a
Hello,
so if I understand correctly, I should create a new module for the OSGi
bundle, containing generic Activators that would be mentioned in the
Driver/Transport MANIFEST?
Etienne
Le ven. 8 mai 2020 à 09:55, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> As mentioned elsewhere, the generic activators could go
As mentioned elsewhere, the generic activators could go in a separate
bundle for OSGi use only. That applies to both this approach and Lukasz'
one.
// Niclas
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:08 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> If your suggested path doesn't limit the framework decisions a
Hi Niclas,
If your suggested path doesn't limit the framework decisions a user has, then I
have no objections.
Indiens I am not that deep into osgi to have a well founded opinion.
The api will probably never be a pure api module as it contains the driver
manager, which I wouldn't want to put
