Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-old-Xerces #132

2019-04-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 22.76 KB...] at hudson.scm.subversion.CheckoutUpdater$SubversionUpdateTask.perform(CheckoutUpdater.java:133) at hudson.scm.subversion.WorkspaceUpda

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.0 release (RC3)

2019-04-06 Thread Andreas Beeker
Hi Greg, here is my +1 thanks for your patience and for pushing this through - it will be easier the next time! ;) I've tested it with the POI Visualizer and it looks good - although it only covers a minimal area of POI. Looking through the files, I've noted two issues: - apart of Nexus, remo

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.0 release (RC3)

2019-04-06 Thread Tim Allison
Sorry for being late to the game. I won’t have time to run regression tests until Monday or so... thank you Dominik and Greg! On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 4:27 AM Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi Greg, > > thanks for running the release and removing all the obstacles on the way, > always good if as many pe

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.0 release (RC3)

2019-04-06 Thread pj.fanning
Thanks Greg. In my testing, I had to make a couple of small code changes to get things working again but nothing big and this is an intermediate version upgrade so that's expected. +1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html --

[Bug 63308] Unable to build POI 4.0.1; ooxml-schemas and ooxml-security not found

2019-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63308 --- Comment #4 from Dominik Stadler --- Thanks for the feedback, I will update the docs slightly about ANT_HOME. I could not reproduce missing jar-files, a clean checkout correctly fetched all jars for me when running "compile". The "mvn-inst

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.0 release (RC3)

2019-04-06 Thread Dominik Stadler
Hi Greg, thanks for running the release and removing all the obstacles on the way, always good if as many people as possible can run the releases. I compared contents of packages for 4.0.1 and 4.1.0, everything looks good. Had some trouble with running the mass regression tests, results should be