https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66371
Bug ID: 66371
Summary: BaseXSSFEvaluationWorkbook.getName(String,sheetIndex)
should return the name from the sheet scope first
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
--- Comment #6 from Espen Amble Kolstad ---
Wow that's impressive response-time \o/
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
and test (r1905574)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
also added r1905572 (XSSFExcelExtractor)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks - added with r1905571
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
--- Comment #3 from Nigel Gay ---
Tried with latest JARs from Jenkins and find no difference. I think its just
not intended to be used the way I am expecting to be able to.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
Espen Amble Kolstad changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|getStringCellValue returns |[PATCH] getStringCellValue
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
Espen Amble Kolstad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||espenamblekols...@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
--- Comment #1 from agala...@gmail.com ---
I posted a mistake in initial comment.
What I wrote : we read a second row as "Alice" and "1".
What should be: we read a second row as "Bob" and "1".
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
agala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |5.2.2-FINAL
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365
Bug ID: 66365
Summary: getStringCellValue returns an index in shared strings
instead of value
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
There are some unreleased changes in XWPF code, eg
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
Would you be able to try the latest code? You can build jars from latest source
code or you could get
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
Nigel Gay changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Nigel Gay
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
Bug ID: 66363
Summary: XWPFDocument.insertTable doesn't work at all
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66360
vincent.lelos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66361
Bug ID: 66361
Summary: Start writing file header early for browser download
progress
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66360
Bug ID: 66360
Summary: Row Span borders render not correctly working with
RegionUtil
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
--- Comment #5 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, I should have mentioned that in the previous comment.
I was considering a test for modifying a theme, but the "XWPFTheme"
implementation is based on/aligned with th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
You also need log4j-api 2.18.0 if you use poi 5.2.3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
You are supposed to match up the version number. Use all 5.2.3 jars or all 3.9
jars but don't mix them.
poi-ooxml-schemas is called poi-ooxml-lite in v5.2.3 (ie the jar name was
changed).
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66356
Bug ID: 66356
Summary: Unable to process Jar entry
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
thanks - added with r1905374
Would it be possible to add a test where a new themes file is created in a docx
file?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
--- Comment #3 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 38435
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38435=edit
Basic test for XWPF themes
Added a small test case to verify that a theme can be read.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
Simon Wagner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
--- Comment #2 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com ---
Sure, I'll add some tests. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
thanks - added with r1905344
Would it be possible to add more test coverage - for regression purposes?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1905308
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66347
Bug ID: 66347
Summary: Add theme support to XWPF
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #5 from Miłosz Rembisz ---
Hi,
I believe this change broke other related behaviour - referencing blank cell.
Having empty cell A1 I whould expect formula "=VALUE(A1)" to evaluate to zero,
instead it now retur
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
--- Comment #7 from Ricardo gomez ---
Gracias
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #6 from Simon Wagner ---
So I refined my patch (since I found another bug with missing multi value
property types) and created a pull request
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/396
There I included a msg file which proves
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
nicolas.her...@emineo.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1905045 - thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #6 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
NB. I didn't override readPropertySet(Class, String) because its private and
only used twice.
I think it would be rather difficult to write a test (static mocking of
logger...) The only test I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #5 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Created attachment 38432
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38432=edit
Proposed patch
Proposed patch to not warn about missing property sets the first time (w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #4 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Thank you for your quick response!
I'll give it a try tomorrow if I get on with the whole project setup...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|HSMF|HMEF
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63955
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||66335
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||63955
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #3 from Nick Burch ---
Create shouldn't issue warnings about missing bits, that does seem like a bug
I guess we should override readProperties and readPropertySet with a boolean
for "being null is fine&qu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #2 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Hi Nick!
Thanks for the explanation!
I'm actually not using HSSFWorkbook#getBytes() directly, but using
HSSFWorkbook#write(OutputStream).
Unfortunately, if I use PoiDocument
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #1 from Nick Burch ---
If you're creating a file from scratch, you may want to have the normal
document properties setup. POIDocument.html#createInformationProperties-- will
do that for you
Also, calling HSSFWorkbook.getBytes
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
Bug ID: 66337
Summary: In-Memory HSSF warns about missing SummaryInformation
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #4 from Simon Wagner ---
My goto example email contains sensitive information, which I can't share.
What I can share is the portion of the __properties_version1.0:
0B 00 55 36 06 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
48 00 01 80
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks Simon.
Unfortunately, I think we need a regression test. Do you have a a file that
reproduces the issue and perhaps some code that parses the file? You don't
necessarily need to provide fully working
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #2 from Simon Wagner ---
Created attachment 38431
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38431=edit
A patch to fix it
I created the patch from the git source. I hope this works.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |major
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
Bug ID: 66335
Summary: PtypGuid 0x0048 is a linked property but is read from
property file
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
There are currently no plans for a formal POI release. They occur approximately
every 6 months. Releases take quite a lot of volunteer effort.
You can build your own jars if you need the latest fixes.
One
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #9 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com ---
P.J. - Can you provide details for the remaining steps for this POI patch?
I see that the patch is merged into `trunk` for GitHub.
Is there a calendar documenting when the next
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
Bug ID: 66319
Summary: Cell.getCellComment or Cell.removeCellComment cause
specific excel fail to write
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #8 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #7)
> I'm afraid that changing the commit message is not really feasible.
Understood.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
I'm afraid that changing the commit message is not really feasible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #6 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #5)
> thanks - added r1904685 - I made a couple of small changes if you want to
> review them
Looks great. Is there a way to amend the commit m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
thanks - added r1904685 - I made a couple of small changes if you want to
review them
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #4 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com ---
Created attachment 38421
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38421=edit
POI-Scratchpad HSMF patch #2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #7 from aoelle...@protonmail.com ---
Ok, I will see what I can do, or whether I can find a viable path around it,
thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
Honestly, POI XWPF performance is poor due to the overheads in XMLBeans. I'd
prefer to get the code working than to worry about performance. In theory, the
code can be tuned later - or overloaded methods
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #5 from aoelle...@protonmail.com ---
XWPFDocument:716 the element is unconditionally added to the paragraphs array.
If it should be supported by apache poi, one would probably need to do a check
on the parent type of the cursor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #4 from aoelle...@protonmail.com ---
>From what I've seen in the patched code, the old paragraph doesn't get
replaced, `document.getgetParagraph(0)` always has the same memory adress
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1904563 - the test results are not as expected - I had to modify the
broken test to get it to pass.
Anton - could you debug the new code to see why it replaces the paragraph
instead of adding one
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #2 from aoelle...@protonmail.com ---
Sorry for the delay!
https://github.com/AntonOellerer/test-poi-paragraph-insertion
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
could you write a full reproducible test case?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
Bug ID: 66312
Summary: Inserting paragraph into table from cursor
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
--- Comment #2 from stephan.schwieb...@gmail.com ---
That was quick, thanks! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1904555
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
Bug ID: 66306
Summary: [PATCH] Make XSLFDiagramGroupShape public
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #10 from J Khanna ---
Do you need any other information to solve the bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Hi Lyn - this needs a test - it can't be merged without one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #2 from lyn.ev...@netdocuments.com ---
Created attachment 38408
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38408=edit
POI-Scratchpad HSMF patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Apologies - wrong link in the issue description - I meant to paste
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74025753/apache-poi-522-and-sumproductabsa1a5-formula-evaluation
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
Bug ID: 66303
Summary: POI excel formula support does not take into account
that many formulas can take a cell range
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Can we get the patch attachment when you are ready? Or better still, a Github
PR.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
Bug ID: 66301
Summary: Add a method to properly write the header necessary
for a MSG attachment
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66283
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
J Khanna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.x-dev |5.2.2-FINAL
--- Comment #9 from J Khanna
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #8 from PJ Fanning ---
I don't have much time to spend on POI right now. One thing to try yourself is
to try out the `importContent` methods on XSLFSlide, XSLFSlideLayout and
XSLFSlideMaster. These are the methods used in our tests
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #7 from J Khanna ---
Please use the reference project -
https://github.com/Jatish-Khanna/apache-poi-example.git
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #6 from J Khanna ---
I've already shared most of things, I'm not sure what else you are looking for?
Only change in my codebase is source of input stream. Otherwise the simplest
possible Java code is available on the reference URL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
Fair enough if you don't want to right a test. I don't want to write one for
you. Maybe someone else will.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
J Khanna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #4 from J Khanna
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
J Khanna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |5.3.x-dev
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #2 from J Khanna ---
Use case: create a single deck by merging all the slides from different decks
Source decks has different slide layouts, sizes.
To load decks source decks, and merge them I'm using Apache POI 5.2.3.
0) create
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Beeker ---
for rendering/reading TIFF images, you need to implement a ImageRenderer [1].
you can delegate the calls to 12 Monkey [2]
... but artistic effects still won't work.
[1]
https://poi.apache.org/apidocs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Can you provide a full test case? Including a couple of random lines of the
code is not enough. This issue and the stackoverflow question are far from
clear.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #13 from Rohit kharya ---
(In reply to Rohit kharya from comment #12)
> @Other info :- I do not know how it is working if we change "tiff" image to
> jgeg/png then it will able to convert
> 'artistic effe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #12 from Rohit kharya ---
@Other info :- I do not know if we change "tiff" image to jgeg/png then
'artistic effects' slide we can able to convert without any new dependency of
'batik' - So it could be tiff image
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #11 from Rohit kharya ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #10)
> I don't know why you are using poi 4.1.1 - it is quite old - you should use
> v5.2.3
>
> with poi 4.1.1, I had to add these jars
>
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
I don't know why you are using poi 4.1.1 - it is quite old - you should use
v5.2.3
with poi 4.1.1, I had to add these jars
implementation 'javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:2.3.1'
implementation
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #9 from Rohit kharya ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #3)
> Can you provide the code you are using? XSLF support is also incomplete - it
> is possible that noone has added support for 'artistic effects'.
Pleas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #8 from Rohit kharya ---
Created attachment 38394
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38394=edit
Eclipse sample app along with problematic pptx file.
You can import application in eclipse and reproduce is
1001 - 1100 of 21913 matches
Mail list logo
