https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66568
Bug ID: 66568
Summary: Incorrect font color chosen from master slide when
font color is unspecified.
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: Macintosh
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
* POI 4 is no longer supported
* the code in poi-ooxml-lite (the replacement for poi-ooxml-schemas in POI 5)
is generated and I don't think we should hack the code in XMLBeans (the tool
that generates
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565
Damien Cuvillier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damien.cuvill...@gotan.io
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565
Bug ID: 66565
Summary: NumCache - Do not load last data version on chart
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #30 from Sachin ---
Hi PJ Fanning in perticular do i need to use this link
https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader-sample/blob/main/src/main/java/com/github/pjfanning/poi/sample/StreamingRead.java
please tell me
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #29 from PJ Fanning ---
https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader supports OOXML strict
format files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #28 from Sachin ---
Hi Asbjørn S. if you know which one to use can you pls help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #27 from Sachin ---
Hi @PJ Fanning i am getting Strict OOXML isn't currently supported error for
line in my code 'Workbook wb = WorkbookFactory.create(inputStream)' i want to
get rid of this. You said ur codde is doing this but i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63580
Daniel Alonzo Diaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danuelalonso.d...@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Raschhofer ---
Thank you for your comments. I'm happy to use git, however I thought it was
readonly and I should provide patches here. I opened a pull request in git
(https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/443).
I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Raschhofer ---
Created attachment 38525
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38525=edit
Benchmark
The attached file contains a benchmark comparing the performance of the
proposed patch agai
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/405 is an unreleased perf change that may
improve perf time of existing code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
It's hard to read this patch on my phone but a quick look makes me think there
is a bug with use of string length - the number of chars as opposed the number
of codepoints. I'm very reluctant to take
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
Bug ID: 66532
Summary: [PATCH] Improve performance of SheetDataWriter
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
--- Comment #2 from Elias Levine ---
Really, to be able to understand how to use this excel, you need to learn and
practice. I have referenced this document https://geometrydashlite.co it's easy
to understand.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61136
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Improve Common SS formula |[PATCH] Improve Common SS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61862
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Isotta ---
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
Also added a FAQ entry for this via r1908266 at
https://poi.apache.org/help/faq.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59663
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66467
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66500
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66515
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66518
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66519
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
also added r1908226
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
Hardware|Macintosh
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
r1908224 removes the poi-bin parts of the gradle and ant builds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #5 from Henry Iguaro ---
Thank you for your response. I would like to clarify that
`XSLFSimpleShape#getAnchor()` already returns `null` in a couple of cases. The
current implementation checks for the presence of the `xfrm` element
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
Bug ID: 66521
Summary: ThreadLocal memory leak in Tomcat
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66518
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
There was a bug in my change -> applied r1908192
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66518
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
I'm not sure about this change. The existing methods don't appear to have ever
been expected to return null. I'd prefer if any change involved us returning an
exception. Since the existing methods don't
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1908188 doc change - will follow up with build changes later
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
Bug ID: 66520
Summary: Adding new series corrupting Word document
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66519
Bug ID: 66519
Summary: Read pagination and conversion issues
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66518
Bug ID: 66518
Summary: ExcelToHtmlConverte conversion to hexadecimal color
format is wrong
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66515
Bug ID: 66515
Summary: Formula not updating after setCellFormula
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #8 from PJ Fanning ---
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-shared-strings has an alternative
implementation of the POI CommentsTable. You could try using that to see it
helps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
Bug ID: 66514
Summary: remove poi-bin zip/tgz from the build
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #7 from javifinar...@hotmail.com ---
For the record, I moved from this bug. Even it is a bottleneck, the worst
bottleneck comes from writing comments, because they are stored all on memory
(lots of ram needed) and a xml copy method
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
Henry Iguaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |5.2.2-FINAL
--- Comment #3 from Henry
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Where did the test file come from? We've gotten away without these null checks
until now so it appears that it is not common to have the `` tag not
appear?
Have you run the POI tests with your code changes
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #1 from Henry Iguaro ---
Link to a Pull Request with a potential fix:
https://github.com/higuaro/poi/pull/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
Bug ID: 66509
Summary: NullPointerException when invoking getAnchor() on
groups/shapes that are missing the off attribute
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
The code is pretty stable and widely used.
The volunteer community is not big enough to make every change that people
request. Generally, if you want a feature or a bug fixed, you should probably
think about
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #5 from javifinar...@hotmail.com ---
hahah the patch could be to remove the function hahaha
if the case is tested, maybe that would be enough
regarding POI being active, you mean that is stable enough that doesn´t receive
much
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
We're not going to remove code that's been there for 12 years.
POI is not very active dev wise any more.
If you want to investigate a solution, please go ahead. Open a new issue if you
want to go this route
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
javifinar...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||javifinar...@hotmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
--- Comment #5 from M. P. Halpin ---
Filed Git pull request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
--- Comment #4 from M. P. Halpin ---
I ran into this using an older version of POI and then ran into it again with
the latest release.
I will resubmit to Git, with a newer version number.
Apologies for any misunderstandings.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
Why are you using since values of 3.14 then?
Some POI maintainers like svn. I hate it and I am the most active committer.
Use svn if you like but I will bow out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
--- Comment #2 from M. P. Halpin ---
This patch was generated against 5.2.3; isn't the next release 5.2.4?
I'm happy to create a GitHub PR, however this was submitted following the
contribution guidelines on the POI website:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
The since value on the annotations say 3.14 - is this a mistake? 3.14 was
released aeons ago. We will not patch 3.14 for you. 5.2.3 is the next release.
I would really prefer these patches to be Github PRs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66503
Bug ID: 66503
Summary: [PATCH] Fix for XL4 Macros
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66501
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66501
Bug ID: 66501
Summary: Incorrect calculation because of using 'double' data
type
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66500
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Also, all the small strings created by code point util should be garbage
collectable as soon as they are iterated over - so if you run into memory
trouble, the garbage collector should be able to claim back
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66500
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
May I ask why you are putting massive strings in individual cells?
I see little point in optimising POI memory usage in this case. The code point
util code here solves a real world problem (support for UTF-8
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66500
Bug ID: 66500
Summary: CodepointsUtil consumed alot of memory when text is
large
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
These classes will not end up in poi-ooxml-lite because no tests use the
classes.
Users who want to use poi-ooxml-full and code at the level of XMLBeans
generated classes may benefit - but coding
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
added with r1907789
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
--- Comment #3 from Wim Champagne ---
I got the schema from
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_standards/ms-odrawxml/1c52d959-25d3-4556-9381-cc86c1221029
Only line 2 and 3 are modified, so it used the 2006 xsd files
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Could you provide a URL for that xsd? Just so we can verify it independently.
Why c15 as a prefix?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
--- Comment #1 from Wim Champagne ---
Created attachment 38500
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38500=edit
Addd the drawing/2012/chart xsd and generate the classes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66485
Bug ID: 66485
Summary: [PATCH] Add xsd schema for drawing/2012/chart
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Bug ID: 66479
Summary: Inserting Line Shape When Dx1>Dx2 in an Excel Cell
Product: POI
Version: 5.3.x-dev
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Prior
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475
Bug ID: 66475
Summary: Remove long deprecated code on SignatureConfig (marked
for removal in 5.0.0)
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
The sample in the original description appears incorrect in that the sample
code does not use getParagraphText().
I can confirm that getParagraphText() does not capitalize the text. It works a
completely
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
see https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576 for related issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
Bug ID: 66473
Summary: speed up SXSSFCell.getColumnIndex()
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
Bug ID: 66472
Summary: Misspell in javadoc at DataFormatter
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44069
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44069
mametjamaan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bz.apache.org/bugzi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65943
--- Comment #8 from yrc <18810746...@139.com> ---
Can you post the example code in the comments section?
thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65943
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1898801 is a publicly
accessible URL.
Talk to your ISP or your network admin.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65943
--- Comment #6 from yrc <18810746...@139.com> ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #3)
> I added r1898801 which includes a test case - the new rich text support only
> works with SXSSFWorkbook instances that have useSharedStrin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66467
Bug ID: 66467
Summary: Unsupported Sprm operation: 58 (0x3A) when extracting
data from a Word 97 document
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: Macintosh
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66436
--- Comment #20 from Tom Xin <766781...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Dominik Stadler from comment #19)
> This is hopefully now fixed via r1907444
>
> The code seems to not have taken into account that ciphers work on data in
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66436
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66436
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|After the .xlsx file is |Invalid handling of padding
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66436
--- Comment #18 from Dominik Stadler ---
I could narrow this down to the following test-case and the following findings:
* The length of the byte[] is related, e.g. using 4000 bytes works, but 3292
like here fails
* The actual byte-data seems
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65260
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1907308 due to https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/425 - but looks like
it might be causing issues itself
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
j.raba...@xdev-software.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.raba...@xdev-software.de
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65462
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pvladisl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
Bug ID: 66462
Summary: Read author of threaded comments
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status
701 - 800 of 21879 matches
Mail list logo
