+1 (binding)
This is a bug and we need this fix.
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:23 AM steven lu wrote:
> # Motivation
>
> reformat property,for a http header name cannot contain the following
> prohibited characters: =,;: \t\r\n\v\f
>
> for example:
>
I have left some comments in the proposal so please hold this vote
until the comments are addressed.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:47 AM wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
> On 26 Jun 2023 at 10:01 +0800, Cong Zhao , wrote:
> > Hello, community:
> >
> > This thread is to
+1 (binding)
Best,
Mattison
On 26 Jun 2023 at 10:01 +0800, Cong Zhao , wrote:
> Hello, community:
>
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-278: Support pluggable topic
> compaction service.
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ox2bot3p9j9fydqkw3v5gt5twc8jslvd
>
> PIP PR:
Hello, community:
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-278: Support pluggable topic
compaction service.
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ox2bot3p9j9fydqkw3v5gt5twc8jslvd
PIP PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20624
Sincerely
Cong Zhao
I'd like to say "a partitioned topic is a topic that consists of
multiple non-partitioned topics". It's better not to use the "internal
topic" concept.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Joo Hyuk Kim wrote:
>
> Hi community:
>
> Currently, it seems like there is no good definition of
Hi Jiwei,
Do you need to change the REST API? or will it just apply to the Admin CLI?
If it requires REST API changes, you should also reflect them in the
proposal.
And yes, using the local and remote will be confusing because users can have
multiple clusters without geo-replication. Maybe we
Hi community:
Currently, it seems like there is no good definition of what "partitioned
topic" and "non-partitioned topic" mean and some places topic
partition and internal
topic interchangeably.
I would like to propose to vote (or discuss) to come up with solid
definition of what composes
+1, this is a good improvement.
In the proposal, I don't suggest you append the `local` to the cluster name:
1. It will be confusing when the original cluster name includes the `local` name
2. In some cases, it is not easy to distinguish between local and
remote clusters
so I suggest we should
