Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

On 2024/08/09 01:10:11 SiNan Liu wrote: > Thank you for your comments. > > I took a look at this. There are a few questions. > > 1. Compared with my proposal to directly add new functions in > pulsar-client, the implementation in this repo is through two topics, one > request topic and one reply

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

+1 to this if can be natively supported in pulsar(across programming languages). Its a useful capability in messaging. https://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/patterns/messaging/RequestReply.html On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 9:05 AM, SiNan Liu wrote: > The focus is not on RPC, but on the Reques

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.13.1 Candidate 1

Repeat my reply on Aug 7 because the message is not shown in https://lists.apache.org/ [1] +1 (binding) - Verified checksum and signatures - Built from source with Go 1.22.1 darwin/arm64 - Ran the perf tool [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26025 Thanks, Yunze On Thu, Aug 8, 2024

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

The focus is not on RPC, but on the Request-Reply synchronous call model. This is a relatively simple function enhancement. As mentioned in the second article above. For the same topic, each message can be sent synchronously or asynchronously. That is to say, the request can be initiated synchrono

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

Thank you for your comments. I took a look at this. There are a few questions. 1. Compared with my proposal to directly add new functions in pulsar-client, the implementation in this repo is through two topics, one request topic and one reply topic. The producer sends the message to the request t

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-369: Flag based selective unload on changing ns-isolation-policy

Thanks for making the proposal. The proposal is well written and the background is well explained. Let's proceed with this. -Lari On 2024/08/02 15:33:47 Anshul Singh wrote: > Hi everyone, > I am proposing some improvements in namespace isolation policy > around namespaces unloading when policy i

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

Thanks for the proposal! Instead of modifying the existing Pulsar client library, I think it's better to create a separate library. The request-reply / rpc model can be implemented on top of the Pulsar client instead of making the support for request-reply a first class citizen of the client AP

[DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

Hi all. I drafted a proposal to support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls in pulsar. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23143 I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks, sinan

Re: [VOTE] PIP-363: Add callback parameters to the method: org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete.

Thanks, everyone. Close this vote with 3 binding +1s: - Zike Yang - Yunze - Haiting Jiang And 3 non-binding +1: - Tao Jiuming -- Best Regards！ crossoverJie Zike Yang 于2024年8月8日周四 18:39写道： > +1 (binding) > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:59 AM Jie crossover > wrote: > > > > H

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.13.1 Candidate 1

+1(binding) - Verified checksum and signatures - Built from source with Go 1.22.1 darwin/arm64 - Ran the make test passed Thanks, Baodi Shi Yunze Xu 于2024年8月7日周三 15:05写道： > > +1 (binding) > > - Verified checksum and signatures > - Built from source with Go 1.22.1 darwin/arm64 > - Ran the perf t

Re: [VOTE] PIP-363: Add callback parameters to the method: org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete.

+1 (binding) BR, Zike Yang On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:59 AM Jie crossover wrote: > > Hi Yunze, > Thank you for your suggestion, I will keep that in mind > during implementation. > -- > Best Regards！ > crossoverJie > > > Yunze Xu 于2024年8月7日周三 15:14写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > > > BTW, I don't think