[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672599#action_12672599
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-1642:
--
Question: is the issue that the send in step (2) is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672600#action_12672600
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1658:
-
This may be due to the fact that send() is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672602#action_12672602
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1583:
-
I've comitted a first cut of this. There needs to
Aidan Skinner wrote:
Since the other thread got canned, let's hope we can get a resolution
on this one. Two questions, since there are orthogonal choices to be
made and Apache doesn't support condorcet voting.
Question 1: Change the version number from M.x:
[ ] Change the release from M.x to
Question 1: Change the version number from M.x:
[X ] Change the release from M.x to any of the other options
Question 2: Change the version number to:
[X] 1.5
Arnaud
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:
Hi as Release Manager for our next release I'd like to suggest the
following time line for this release.
Development---|--- Bug Fix, Feature Freeze ---|--- Branch --- | Release
The dates for each phase would be as follows:
End of Development : 2009-03-02
End of Feature Freeze : 2009-03-16
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrea Gazzarini resolved QPID-1582.
Resolution: Fixed
Hi all,
the last step (at the moment) of QMan is here : implementation
Hi all,
the last step (at the moment) of QMan is here : I just submitted code for
QPID-1582 (implementation on QMan of WS-Notification).
As first version there are only two topics : one for lifecycle events of
object instances (create remove) and one for lifecycle events (only
create) of events.
Oddness, works here:
[junit] Running org.apache.qpid.management.wsdm.WsDmAdapterTest
[junit] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.445 sec
-Original Message-
From: aidan.skin...@gmail.com [mailto:aidan.skin...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Aidan Skinner
Sent: 11
Sorry the tests were failing because I forgot to change a little thing
on a class.
I immediately made another submit for that.
That's the reason why now should be ok
Regards
Andrea
On 2/11/09, Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Robbie Gemmell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672664#action_12672664
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1621:
-
The test for this looks like:
A: send 5001
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming reassigned QPID-1658:
-
Assignee: Rafael H. Schloming
JMS client OutOfMemoryError when sending 4k
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672665#action_12672665
]
Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-1658:
---
This is my fault. I added a Session
Picking up from end of January...
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Jansen (Interop Systems Inc)
[mailto:v-clj...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 6:48 PM
Alan Conway wrote:
I'd be interested in cmake only if it gives us significantly
smaller/simpler build files
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Andrea Gazzarini a.gazzar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry the tests were failing because I forgot to change a little thing
on a class.
I immediately made another submit for that.
That's the reason why now should be ok
Ah, awesome. Thanks dude.
- Aidan
--
Apache
Jonathan Robie wrote:
Now that M4 is out, I think this is a good time to do spring
housecleaning on the client APIs. Some of these APIs have a lot of
legacy stuff that we don't really for users, one language does things
differently from another language for historical reasons, and there's a
C++ seems simpler and cleaner to me here. You create a Connection
object, open it, then use it to create a Session object:
C++:
=
Connection connection;
try {
connection.open(host, port);
Session session = connection.newSession();
Python is more complex, because it requires:
*
Rafael Schloming wrote:
I think comparing code snippets is a good idea. I would be tempted for
starters to identify a few key use-cases/tasks rather than going
class-by-class right off the bat, e.g. opening a connection, opening a
session, publishing a message, subscribing with a listener,
Jonathan Robie wrote:
From our sample programs:
C++:
#include qpid/client/Connection.h
#include qpid/client/Session.h
using namespace qpid::client;
using namespace qpid::framing;
Python:
import qpid
import sys
import os
from qpid.util import connect
from qpid.connection import Connection
Jonathan Robie wrote:
C++ seems simpler and cleaner to me here. You create a Connection
object, open it, then use it to create a Session object:
C++:
=
Connection connection;
try {
connection.open(host, port);
Session session = connection.newSession();
Python is more complex,
Question 1: Change the version number from M.x:
[X] Change the release from M.x to any of the other options
[ ] Change the release from M.x to only my preferred option from Question 2,
otherwise keep it the same
[ ] Keep the release number as M.x
Question 2: Change the version number to:
[X]
HOW DO I GET OFF THIS LIST?!?! I HAVE FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS SEVERAL TIMES!!!
- Original Message -
From: Ted Ross [tr...@redhat.com]
Sent: 02/11/2009 12:50 PM EST
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Changing the version number and what to change it too
Question 1: Change
Hi All,
I had a stab at re organizing the Qpid documentation page.
Looking at dev/user list I found that several users had a bit of trouble
finding out the info they are looking for.
The goals for the re-org are,
1. Provide a top level index of documentation broken down by functional
area.
2.
Hi all, I just found an eclipse plugin for confluence (and I think that it's
working offline too)... so I was thinking to condivide with you how is
composed my IDE:
Base Eclipse (Java + JUnit) ***
*For development and unit testing
Mylyn plugin (+JIRA extension) ***
*There is the base
Help! This is another page also claiming to be the documentation page.
It's not what users will get if they click on the Documentation link
on the left hand side.
I really think we need to focus on what users get to if they click on
the navigation links first. I've seen several pages that try
Jonathan, appologies if I wasn't clear enough.
The goal was to replace the current documentaiton page at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Documentation with the
proposed
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/DocumentationB
The reason why I created a parallel page was for
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Andrea Gazzarini a.gazzar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, I just found an eclipse plugin for confluence (and I think that it's
working offline too)... so I was thinking to condivide with you how is
composed my IDE:
[...]
I don't know if for you is the same but
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Jonathan, appologies if I wasn't clear enough.
The goal was to replace the current documentaiton page at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Documentation with the
proposed
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/DocumentationB
The reason why I
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Robie
jonathan.ro...@redhat.comwrote:
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Jonathan, appologies if I wasn't clear enough.
The goal was to replace the current documentaiton page at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Documentation with the
proposed
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Now there will be API guides for QMF as well. Ex the python and c++ based
API's.
We need to make sure we distinguish properly between these API's and the
messaging client API's
Currently, the Python console API is in the normal Python API docs. Is
there a reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12672735#action_12672735
]
Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-1658:
---
This should be fixed on trunk now. By
John O'Hara wrote:
Very well considered, and highly flexible.Compatible with where AMQP1.0 is
heading (wrt TLS handling -- balance of opinion is that TLS will be on the
same port, as it would be for Kerberos based encryption).
Missed out a TLS example:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Rafael Schloming rafa...@redhat.com wrote:
- I can buy adding a static convenience method similar to the C++ one,
although I'd expect a username and password somewhere as well. I think we
should preserve the ability to pass in a socket from an arbitrary source
I don't like there is a link for each client, I would prefer it to be an
achor to the info on the same page... not links
to separate pages.. to much clicking around
Carl.
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Robie
jonathan.ro...@redhat.comwrote:
Rajith
Alan Conway wrote:
John O'Hara wrote:
Very well considered, and highly flexible.Compatible with where
AMQP1.0 is
heading (wrt TLS handling -- balance of opinion is that TLS will be
on the
same port, as it would be for Kerberos based encryption).
Missed out a TLS example:
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.comwrote:
I don't like there is a link for each client, I would prefer it to be an
achor to the info on the same page... not links
to separate pages.. to much clicking around
It can be done in a
TLS doesn't have to be TCP/IP. From the RFC:At the lowest level, layered
on top of some reliable transport protocol (e.g., TCP[TCP]), is the TLS
Record Protocol.
For example I could theoretically used TLS over Socket Direct Protocol
over IB. What is needs is reliability and order underneath.
37 matches
Mail list logo
