On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
> Author: ritchiem
> Date: Thu Oct 8 08:17:33 2009
> New Revision: 823087
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=823087&view=rev
> Log:
> QPID-1950 : Problem is that the thrown exception whilst an IOException does
> not signify that the socket has close
2009/10/14 Aidan Skinner :
>> tremendous opportunity that we as a project must not miss. If
>> necessary we need to be creative, and put together some "PDC 0.6
>> Preview" release that perhaps covers the key bits of 0.6 where they
>> are essential. For example, I imagine we do not need the Java br
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Robert Greig wrote:
> Do we have a clearly defined scope for the release? Are all the things
> in scope for the release in Jira? I think it would be good be able to
> give Dave some more scientific analysis on the likelihood of hitting
> the date.
Optimist!
> Is
Hi Dave,
This is terrific news - thanks for letting us know !
>From a Java perspective we can definitely be ready, unless Rajith or Rafi
plan to land anything substantial between now and then ?
Andrew - can you pull together the release/have time to get it speeding
along for these timelines ?
M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765722#action_12765722
]
Nuno Santos commented on QPID-2131:
---
Armin,
I appreciate the patch, but could you please
Hi Steve,
So the theory is here for the process in general:
http://qpid.apache.org/qpid-release-page.html
I'm pretty sure this is what we aimed to do, but there quite a bit of
aspiration on there. Alternatively, maybe we thought of a better way but
didn't get round to typing it up :-)
However,
2009/10/14 Martin Ritchie :
> I'd like to think we could pull together to get the release done for
> then but historically we are not very good at getting the releases
> out.
> The 0.5 Release schedule was :
> End of Development : 2009-03-02
> End of Feature Freeze : 2009-03-16
> Release : 2009-03
Cluster must verify compatibility of options when a node attempts to join the
cluster
-
Key: QPID-2146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2146
Project: Q
Hi,
I'm running two clusters A and B with one broker each, and each cluster only
publishes their own broker address. My client program has both A and B listed
in it's broker url config, but B is physically unavailable to client. I was
suppose that the client will be able to connect to broker A
Need "exit immediately" flag for broker
---
Key: QPID-2145
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2145
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: C++ Broker
Reporter:
Need consistent design / rationalized features across Python tools
--
Key: QPID-2144
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2144
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Need clear "broker is ready" message
Key: QPID-2143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2143
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Broker
Reporter: Jonath
Need wireshark plugin
-
Key: QPID-2142
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2142
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Jonathan Robie
We need a wireshark plugin for AMQP 0-10.
--
This
need consistent naming for broker entities
--
Key: QPID-2141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2141
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Broker
Repo
need similar mechanisms for logging in all clients/brokers
--
Key: QPID-2140
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2140
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Compone
Usability of log messages
-
Key: QPID-2139
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2139
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Broker
Reporter: Jonathan Robie
I would like to have a closer look, but will be tied up for the rest of
this week. Can you delay the final commit until next week?
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 16:55 -0700, Steve Huston (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpane
Sounds like a good goal to work to.
Carl.
David Ingham wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that we're planning on showcasing Qpid at the upcoming Microsoft PDC (Professional Developers Conference) [1]. We're planning a session focused on queuing and pub/sub in a heterogeneous envir
2009/10/14 David Ingham :
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that we're planning on showcasing Qpid at the
> upcoming Microsoft PDC (Professional Developers Conference) [1]. We're
> planning a session focused on queuing and pub/sub in a heterogeneous
> environment. This will cover exist
19 matches
Mail list logo