>
> From what I understood, the primary reason Danushka is looking to have a
> virtual host per tenant is for access control.
> Is that correct ?
>
Plus object distinction.
For an example, users in different tenants should be able to create a
destination with the same name but they should have di
On 03/31/2011 01:36 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
I know Gordon said:
"Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to
the
following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for the
r
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:36 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
> ...please reply with your +1 / -1 vote, or cross one of the boxes for
> each of the cases below:
>
> (a)
>
> [ ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
> [ ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 should NOT be removed from the
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Stop publishing release artefacts for
> unmaintained components (was Re: 0.10 release update - RC1 and status)
>
>
> On 03/18/2011 03
JMS Failover Not Working
Key: QPID-3177
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3177
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.10
Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
Assignee: Rajit
I have identified a blocker for this release.
Please see QPID-3177 for details.
Rajith.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Steve Huston wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I filed QPID-3176 (0.10 RC2 cpp dist missing
> examples/old_api/CMakeLists.txt) - please let me know if you'd like this
> resolved for the
+1 for all 3.
I am in favour of removing all three components.
As Rob mentioned we could just moved it to some designated location in the
source tree.
Julian Cadet did some work on this along with Aidan Skinner. So I assume
Julian is probably using this client.
Leaving the code intact in some loca
On 31 March 2011 21:06, Robert Godfrey wrote:
>
>
> On 31 March 2011 19:36, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>> On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
>>>
>>> I know Gordon said:
"Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific up
On 31 March 2011 19:36, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
>>
>> I know Gordon said:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the
>>> following artefacts - and volunteers to verify
On 03/31/2011 01:36 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
(a)
[ ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
[ ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release (please
list changes it includes to support this vote)
(b)
[ ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 SHOULD be remove
On 03/28/2011 06:34 AM, Paul Colby wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just wondering, what is the official status of CMake support in Qpid?
It seems to me (I know very little about CMake) that the existing
SWIG-based bindings are not being built by CMake, despite the presence
of CMakeList.txt files... is this
On 03/31/2011 01:36 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
(a)
[ ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
[ ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10
release (please list changes it includes to support this vote)
(b)
[ ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 SHOULD be re
On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
I know Gordon said:
"Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the
following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for the
release
- we remove them from the published li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming resolved QPID-3130.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> slow codec
> --
>
> Key: QPID-3130
>
Justin,
I filed QPID-3176 (0.10 RC2 cpp dist missing
examples/old_api/CMakeLists.txt) - please let me know if you'd like this
resolved for the next cut. I think it should be included but is not
critical.
Thanks,
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Ross [mailto:jr...@redhat.com]
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming updated QPID-2968:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.9)
> Blocking on dead sockets
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming updated QPID-3130:
--
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> slow codec
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston resolved QPID-3176.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on trunk r1087341.
I'd like to merge this to 0.10 but it is not critical.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
JAkub Scholz updated QPID-3175:
---
Attachment: QPID-3175.patch
Attached it the patch described in previous comment. The patch is created
0.10 RC2 cpp dist missing examples/old_api/CMakeLists.txt
-
Key: QPID-3176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3176
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Packa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014018#comment-13014018
]
JAkub Scholz commented on QPID-3175:
I tried to solve this issue and got to the followi
SSL support in Python client libraries
--
Key: QPID-3175
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Python Client
Affects Versions: 0.8
broker crash using rdma+sasl
Key: QPID-3174
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3174
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ Broker
Reporter: michael j. goulish
This is s
add support for specifying a maximum for message number of delivery attempts
before moving messages to a dead letter queue
--
Key: QPID-3173
UR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013973#comment-13013973
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2970:
--
Completed on branch, still needs ported to/imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2972.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> client configuration for max delivery count
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2973.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> broker handling of reject without requeue and setup/use of DLQ
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2971.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> client recieve/onMessage handling of max delivery count
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2974.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> broker configuration for enabling/disabling dead letter queues
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2970.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> add support for specifying a maximum for message number of delivery attempts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-3158:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.10
0.9
M2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-3158.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Keith Wall)
> .NET 0-8 clients fail to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013969#comment-13013969
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3158:
--
Patches applied.
> .NET 0-8 clients fail to c
Hi Justin,
- Original Message -
> Hi, everyone.
>
> This is part one in a two-part series. I'm first tackling the features
> and improvements from the following jira query, also linked on the
> release page[1]:
>
> I'm looking for feedback about:
>
> - What needs expansion; many thing
On 03/30/2011 04:35 PM, jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, everyone.
This is part one in a two-part series. I'm first tackling the features and
improvements from the following jira query, also linked on the release page[1]:
http://bit.ly/h3Q7Sk
Some of the jiras listed there are unresolved. I ignored
On 03/30/2011 08:11 PM, mgoul...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mgoulish
Date: Wed Mar 30 19:11:09 2011
New Revision: 1087047
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1087047&view=rev
Log:
qpid-3171
The registration of the codec happens on a different thread from the
use of the codec. It is possible f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell reassigned QPID-3167:
Assignee: Keith Wall (was: Robbie Gemmell)
Keith, could you review please? Thanks.
> impro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-3167:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> improve unit testing of SimpleAMQQueue#processQueue(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell reassigned QPID-3165:
Assignee: Keith Wall (was: Robbie Gemmell)
Keith, could you review please? Thanks.
> queue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-3165:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> queue Runner may cease early during asynchronous del
40 matches
Mail list logo
