[jira] [Commented] (DISPATCH-195) Add support for transactional messages in the Router

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16112148#comment-16112148 ] Dan Langford commented on DISPATCH-195: --- i wanted to leave a comment here because this page

[jira] [Comment Edited] (QPIDJMS-307) fix handling of failure to create transacted session when running against Dispatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111817#comment-16111817 ] Dan Langford edited comment on QPIDJMS-307 at 8/3/17 3:31 AM: -- for the

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-307) fix handling of failure to create transacted session when running against Dispatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111817#comment-16111817 ] Dan Langford commented on QPIDJMS-307: -- for the record this was against Dispatch 0.7.0. Now that I

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111720#comment-16111720 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPID-7874: -- Github user chrisrichardson77 commented on the issue:

[GitHub] qpid-cpp issue #5: QPID-7874 Remove unnecessary link check when adding route...

Github user chrisrichardson77 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/qpid-cpp/pull/5 Better fix proposed with use of config flag --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7876) qpid-route does not properly consider src-local when matching bridges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111716#comment-16111716 ] Gordon Sim commented on QPID-7876: -- Thanks again Chris! > qpid-route does not properly consider src-local

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111715#comment-16111715 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPID-7874: -- GitHub user chrisrichardson77 opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111718#comment-16111718 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPID-7874: -- Github user chrisrichardson77 closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] qpid-cpp pull request #5: QPID-7874 Remove unnecessary link check when addin...

Github user chrisrichardson77 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/qpid-cpp/pull/5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-7876) qpid-route does not properly consider src-local when matching bridges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-7876. -- Resolution: Fixed > qpid-route does not properly consider src-local when matching bridges >

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7875) qpid-route fetches links multiple times when deleting routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111714#comment-16111714 ] Gordon Sim commented on QPID-7875: -- Thanks Chris! > qpid-route fetches links multiple times when deleting

[GitHub] qpid-cpp pull request #8: QPID-7874 Use qpid-route quiet option to suppress ...

GitHub user chrisrichardson77 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-cpp/pull/8 QPID-7874 Use qpid-route quiet option to suppress extra link checks You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/fourceu/qpid-cpp

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-7875) qpid-route fetches links multiple times when deleting routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-7875. -- Resolution: Fixed > qpid-route fetches links multiple times when deleting routes >

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7876) qpid-route does not properly consider src-local when matching bridges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111709#comment-16111709 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7876: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7875) qpid-route fetches links multiple times when deleting routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111708#comment-16111708 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7875: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111698#comment-16111698 ] Chris Richardson commented on QPID-7874: While testing an alternative patch along the lines above,

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111644#comment-16111644 ] Chris Richardson commented on QPID-7874: That sounds like a good solution. I certainly agree there

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-7877) [linearstore] Recent change to journal-flush-timeout parameter changed units, limited minimum value to 1ms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kim van der Riet resolved QPID-7877. Resolution: Fixed > [linearstore] Recent change to journal-flush-timeout parameter changed

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7877) [linearstore] Recent change to journal-flush-timeout parameter changed units, limited minimum value to 1ms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111640#comment-16111640 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7877: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7666) [linearstore] Enhancements to the write buffer default and per-queue options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111641#comment-16111641 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7666: --- Commit

[jira] [Created] (QPID-7877) [linearstore] Recent change to journal-flush-timeout parameter changed units, limited minimum value to 1ms

Kim van der Riet created QPID-7877: -- Summary: [linearstore] Recent change to journal-flush-timeout parameter changed units, limited minimum value to 1ms Key: QPID-7877 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7874) qpid-route performs an unnecessary link check when adding routes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111622#comment-16111622 ] Gordon Sim commented on QPID-7874: -- I think it might be good to make it configurable. Though as you say it

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1528) [C++ binding] AMQP open sent with container ID as empty string

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111608#comment-16111608 ] Kim van der Riet commented on PROTON-1528: -- The sender and receiver use the following pattern

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-1528) [C++ binding] AMQP open sent with container ID as empty string

Kim van der Riet created PROTON-1528: Summary: [C++ binding] AMQP open sent with container ID as empty string Key: PROTON-1528 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1528 Project: Qpid

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DISPATCH-782) [unit-tests] SIGSEGV in qd_python_finalize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111449#comment-16111449 ] Jiri Danek edited comment on DISPATCH-782 at 8/2/17 6:16 PM: - Sorry for the

[jira] [Commented] (DISPATCH-782) [unit-tests] SIGSEGV in qd_python_finalize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111449#comment-16111449 ] Jiri Danek commented on DISPATCH-782: - Sorry for the problems with the trace. I did the rr recording

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-294) The SCRAM-SHA-* SASL mechanisms should verify the server final message if it is sent in the additional-data field of sasl-outcome

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111250#comment-16111250 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPIDJMS-294: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] qpid-jms pull request #9: QPIDJMS-294: Ensure that SASL mechanism has comple...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/qpid-jms/pull/9 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-294) The SCRAM-SHA-* SASL mechanisms should verify the server final message if it is sent in the additional-data field of sasl-outcome

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111246#comment-16111246 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPIDJMS-294: Sorry, I actually missed your JIRA comment yesterday

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-294) The SCRAM-SHA-* SASL mechanisms should verify the server final message if it is sent in the additional-data field of sasl-outcome

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111249#comment-16111249 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-294: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-308) update to proton-j 0.20.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1683#comment-1683 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-308: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-308) update to proton-j 0.20.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1684#comment-1684 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-308: - Commit

[jira] [Created] (QPIDJMS-308) update to proton-j 0.20.0

Robbie Gemmell created QPIDJMS-308: -- Summary: update to proton-j 0.20.0 Key: QPIDJMS-308 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-308 Project: Qpid JMS Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (DISPATCH-782) [unit-tests] SIGSEGV in qd_python_finalize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiri Danek updated DISPATCH-782: Attachment: rr-4dd876.zip [~ganeshmurthy] it should be possible to run this with {{rr replay

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DISPATCH-782) [unit-tests] SIGSEGV in qd_python_finalize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111070#comment-16111070 ] Jiri Danek edited comment on DISPATCH-782 at 8/2/17 3:02 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7434) Mature the AMQP message conversion layer (headers and content)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111063#comment-16111063 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7434: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7434) Mature the AMQP message conversion layer (headers and content)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16111064#comment-16111064 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7434: --- Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-1525) enable configuring the initial remote max frame size limit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-1525. Resolution: Fixed > enable configuring the initial remote max frame size limit >

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-1486) no mechanism to get or set the additional-data field on sasl-outcome

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-1486: --- Summary: no mechanism to get or set the additional-data field on sasl-outcome (was:

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-7869) [Java Broker] Truststore improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall updated QPID-7869: - Attachment: 0001-QPID-7869-Proof-of-concept-only-validate-the-trust-a.patch > [Java Broker] Truststore

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-7869) [Java Broker] Truststore improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall updated QPID-7869: - Attachment: (was: 0001-QPID-7869-Work-in-progress.patch) > [Java Broker] Truststore improvements >

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-7434) Mature the AMQP message conversion layer (headers and content)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16110870#comment-16110870 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7434: --- Commit

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-7229) [Java Broker] Update Dojo to 1.11.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-7229: - Attachment: QPID-7229-upgrade-dojo-to-v1.12.2.diff > [Java Broker] Update Dojo to 1.11.1 >

[jira] [Created] (QPIDJMS-307) fix handling of failure to create transacted session when running against Dispatch

Robbie Gemmell created QPIDJMS-307: -- Summary: fix handling of failure to create transacted session when running against Dispatch Key: QPIDJMS-307 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-307

Re: qpid-broker-j-6.1.4 examples will not run

On 2 August 2017 at 07:50, Rob Godfrey wrote: > On 2 August 2017 at 00:15, d...@ucar.edu wrote: > >> Sorry for being so dense, but... >> >> Clearly, I am assuming something about the broker >> distribution that is not true. Specifially, I am assuming >>

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1484) [c proactor] SIGSEGV in pconnection_cleanup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16110483#comment-16110483 ] Jiri Danek commented on PROTON-1484: I cannot reproduce this on master anymore. Tested version on

[jira] [Closed] (PROTON-1484) [c proactor] SIGSEGV in pconnection_cleanup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiri Danek closed PROTON-1484. -- > [c proactor] SIGSEGV in pconnection_cleanup > --- > >

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-1484) [c proactor] SIGSEGV in pconnection_cleanup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiri Danek resolved PROTON-1484. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > [c proactor] SIGSEGV in pconnection_cleanup >

[jira] [Closed] (DISPATCH-778) [system_tests_two_routers] qd_hash_internal_remove_item: Assertion `(bucket->items).size > 0' failed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiri Danek closed DISPATCH-778. --- > [system_tests_two_routers] qd_hash_internal_remove_item: Assertion > `(bucket->items).size > 0'

[jira] [Resolved] (DISPATCH-778) [system_tests_two_routers] qd_hash_internal_remove_item: Assertion `(bucket->items).size > 0' failed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiri Danek resolved DISPATCH-778. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce I cannot reproduce this on master anymore. Tested version on

Re: qpid-broker-j-6.1.4 examples will not run

On 2 August 2017 at 00:15, d...@ucar.edu wrote: > Sorry for being so dense, but... > > Clearly, I am assuming something about the broker > distribution that is not true. Specifially, I am assuming > that the qpid broker distribution is self contained. > [Judging from the replies,

[jira] [Commented] (DISPATCH-782) [unit-tests] SIGSEGV in qd_python_finalize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16110400#comment-16110400 ] Jiri Danek commented on DISPATCH-782: - [~ganeshmurthy] The bug is still present in current master.