On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>> I think we should exclude Desired Future Endstate from consideration
>> for this work. The 0-10 stuff is obviously relevant, since it will be
>> taking place concurrently.
>
> Ok. I only really mentioned it due to past discussions where in
> -Original Message-
> From: Aidan Skinner [mailto:aidan.skin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29 April 2009 18:42
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>
> > One upcoming elephant to consider is going to be AMQP 1.0 support and
> > how its new messaging/component model will
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> One upcoming elephant to consider is going to be AMQP 1.0 support and
> how its new messaging/component model will affect the management
> interfaces. As the Java broker is presumably going to support the
> current protocol versions and gai
Hi all. Just kicking off some discussion on issues likely to affect what
I do during the GSoC work, to help Aidan and I put together a better
plan of action.
One upcoming elephant to consider is going to be AMQP 1.0 support and
how its new messaging/component model will affect the management
inter
