---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22975/#review46912
---
Actually it turns out when applying this patch that there is an issu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22975/#review46738
---
Ship it!
Fair enough, thanks for the explanation.
- Gordon Sim
O
> On June 26, 2014, 8:18 a.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> > No objection to this change. However, what would be the impact of change
> > the field type? I'm assuming the python tools wouldn't fail, would they? If
> > we can get a solid understanding of the impact of just changing the type,
> > and de
> On June 26, 2014, 8:18 a.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> > No objection to this change. However, what would be the impact of change
> > the field type? I'm assuming the python tools wouldn't fail, would they? If
> > we can get a solid understanding of the impact of just changing the type,
> > and de
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22975/#review46724
---
No objection to this change. However, what would be the impact of ch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22975/#review46707
---
Ship it!
There's a typo in your "testing" comment - you say 1024 by
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22975/
---
Review request for qpid, Alan Conway and Gordon Sim.
Repository: qpid
Descrip
