This sounds like something I should remember
Can this be placed on the qpid wiki dev pages? Maybe on the release process
page?
I'd do it myself, but don't have commit privs yet.
Thanks,
-K
- Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
I've just noticed (after several hours of
I've just noticed (after several hours of puzzling about what was
screwing up my git branch history) that there are a number of branches
and tags that omit the top level, redundant qpid directory.
Now I'm for getting rid of uselessness like this as much as the next guy
(and I'm in fact
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Stitcher [mailto:astitc...@redhat.com]
Sent: 06 January 2010 21:43
To: Qpid Dev List
Subject: Subversion tags and branches (a little moan)
I've just noticed (after several hours of puzzling about what was
screwing up my git branch history
I only ask as both already exist.
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Stitcher [mailto:astitc...@redhat.com]
Sent: 06 January 2010 22:09
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion tags and branches (a little moan)
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:00 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:14 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I only ask as both already exist.
Bugger, you're right - I'm starting to hate svn branching.
I'll fix it (when I figure out the idiot thing I did)
Andrew
-
Apache
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:14 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I only ask as both already exist.
Bugger, you're right - I'm starting to hate svn branching.
I'll fix it (when I figure out the idiot thing I did)
Figured it out and fixed
