Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

Ah, I didn’t notice the artifacts because they weren’t listed in the email. The vote thread needs to list the URLs of the artifacts and include (in the body of the email) the checksums. (Why? Because people voting on the release must download those artifacts and check them against the

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

We have been publishing to the dev/ svn https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC5/ Maybe we missed something. Is there a better way to announce this? On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > I haven’t been voting on the RCs because I

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

I haven’t been voting on the RCs because I haven’t yet seen a “release candidate” — a signed artifact (tarball) and its checksums. It seems that while the code is in good shape, release packaging needs some work. I’ll weigh in on the latest RC vote thread. Julian > On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:33

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

Hi Julian, Thanks for your inputs. I will modify the report accordingly and send it out for review. Just an update on the release progress - Marc floated a vote for RC5 (yesterday evening CST) on the dev list, which has gotten more than 3 +1s so far. It appears that this release candidate

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

Hi Julian, I agree that 'this week' is optimistic. Though, we have been going through the voting process on @dev, it's likely that the current RC will not pass, meaning that we'll need to restart the whole process, as you said. Considering, 'this month' is probably a more realistic wording. On

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

In answer to the “How does the podling rate their maturity?”. The incubator report used to have categories "Ready to Graduate", “Some Community Growth", "No Release" and "Still Getting Started.” Out of these, I think “No release” fits best. You can add that the first release is well under way.

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

Hi Roman, Apologies for the delay. I am not sure how to address two of these questions, hence left them blank. Any inputs in that regard should be helpful. Can you please review the following report? * Your project name Apache (incubating) Quickstep * A brief description of your

We really need to get going with the podling report

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?