Re: [racket-dev] bug czar wanted

Just in case you're wondering, there are no volunteers yet. On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > We are looking for a volunteer for the 'bug czar' position. The person's > responsibility is > > -- to read bug reports as they come in > -- to guess who is responsible f

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

Thanks! I've pushed a repair to JIT compilation of `unsafe-set-box*!' (and the test case that was supposed to check it but missed). At Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:34:03 +0200, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > I'm pretty sure that this is a bug in `unsafe-set-box*!'. The > following version of "que.ss" doesn't

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

I'm pretty sure that this is a bug in `unsafe-set-box*!'. The following version of "que.ss" doesn't have the problem, but adding the * results in the segfault. On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Hari Prashanth wrote: > Yes the problem goes away once I turn off the optimizer... I have attached > the

[racket-dev] bug czar wanted

We are looking for a volunteer for the 'bug czar' position. The person's responsibility is -- to read bug reports as they come in -- to guess who is responsible for the bug -- to close out 'email level' reports (non-bug reports), spam reports, etc -- and to assign the remaining ones to th

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

Yes the problem goes away once I turn off the optimizer... I have attached the code. #lang typed/racket (require "que.ss") (head (queue 1 2 3 4)) - Original Message - From: "Vincent St-Amour" To: "Matthew Flatt" Cc: "Hari Prashanth" , "dev" Sent: Friday, September 3, 2010 11:39:50 A

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

On Sep 3, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:27:08 -0400 (EDT), Hari Prashanth wrote: > > I am getting the following error... And this is the only message I get... > > > > SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0xfffc > > This often means 0xfffc isn't getting mar

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

At Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:34:10 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Thanks for sending the code. I see that it's using Typed Racket with > #:optimize. Maybe Vincent and Sam should take a look to make sure that > the optimizer isn't generating incorrect unsafe code? Yes, please send us the code. First thing

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

At Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:27:08 -0400 (EDT), Hari Prashanth wrote: > I am getting the following error... And this is the only message I get... > > SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0xfffc > This often means 0xfffc isn't getting marked, and was prematurely > freed > Aborte

Re: [racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

Yes can you send me the code? The smaller the better :) Kevin On 09/02/2010 09:27 PM, Hari Prashanth wrote: I am getting the following error... And this is the only message I get... SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0xfffc This often means 0xfffc isn't getting mark