On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> David Van Horn wrote at 04/23/2011 09:12 PM:
>>
>> was to define the language of client to server messages as a Redex
>> language and then use Redex's random term generation to stress test our
>> server.
>
> Would be interesting to see how th
David Van Horn wrote at 04/23/2011 09:12 PM:
was to define the language of client to server messages as a Redex
language and then use Redex's random term generation to stress test
our server.
Would be interesting to see how this work with Redex would be framed
within related work. There is a
Sam and I have been teaching a first year course on programming and our
final project is a distributed, multi-player game similar to this one:
http://www.gamedesign.jp/flash/dice/dice.html
Students had to write clients, servers, and AI players, and during our
final exam period, we're going
Checklist items for the v5.1.1 release
(using the v5.1.0.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes are
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Also: anyone else who has the energy to fiddle with the teaching
> languages a bit, doing some fiddling now would be helpful
I will be fiddling when I do my checks. I tend to wait these days to go as one
of the last ones.
___
Robby Findler writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Michael Sperber
> wrote:
>>
>> Ryan Culpepper writes:
>>
>>> * Mike Sperber
>>> - DMdA Tests
>>> - Stepper Tests
>>> - Signature Tests
>>
>> Pending the merge of 7f9bd528573ddbe5c3b4607e0b9d842e93662427 into the
>> release branch,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Michael Sperber
wrote:
>
> Ryan Culpepper writes:
>
>> * Mike Sperber
>> - DMdA Tests
>> - Stepper Tests
>> - Signature Tests
>
> Pending the merge of 7f9bd528573ddbe5c3b4607e0b9d842e93662427 into the
> release branch, done. (Thanks, Robby!)
I hate to be
Two days ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>
> > * Jon Rafkind
> > Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
> > - Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
> > compile fine
> > - Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in
> > both normal and unix-st
>
> * Greg Cooper
> - FrTime Tests
>
Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
hi Kevin:
Thanks for your help here. I'm trying to enable "place" first then I think
I can apply your patch. Is there still a way to reduce unused memory as in
your patch, but without the need of "place"?
Nevo
On 23 April 2011 21:16, Kevin Tew wrote:
> Here is another patch you can try to red
Here is another patch you can try to reduce caching of unused memory.
diff --git a/src/racket/gc2/alloc_cache.c b/src/racket/gc2/alloc_cache.c
index 44895af..d1f1c03 100644
--- a/src/racket/gc2/alloc_cache.c
+++ b/src/racket/gc2/alloc_cache.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*/
/* Controls how often freed pa
>
> I am curious which iPhone and which iPad?
>
> For the non-iPad owners here are a few (unofficial) specs, so you
> have a rough idea of how much memory the iDevices have:
>
> Internal RAM for:
> iPad 2512MB
> iPad 1256MB
>
> iPhone 4 512MB
> iPhone 3GS256M
Yeah, I've already found that in vm.c . I'll have to enable place, but right
now, as you may notice, I'm trying to run Racket engine on iOS, and I want
to start from the simple hygienic interpreter. Actually, I'm curious about
why even a "hello world" test requires more than 30MB memory. I've ever
Ryan Culpepper writes:
> * Mike Sperber
> - DMdA Tests
> - Stepper Tests
> - Signature Tests
Pending the merge of 7f9bd528573ddbe5c3b4607e0b9d842e93662427 into the
release branch, done. (Thanks, Robby!)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_
9 hours ago, Noel Welsh wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Is there some obvious reason for the huge difference in
> > improvement between the 32 and the 64 bits (Almost twice slower
> > and roughly the same resp.)?
>
> My guess is that this benchmark is dominated
2011/4/22 Nevo :
> hi
> My attempt on porting Racket interpreter to iOS has been for a while and
> I've been able to run interpreter on both iOS device as well iOS simulator.
Great news.
> Right now, it runs perfectly on iOS simulator, but lack of satisfaction on
> device. The reason is for tho
BLOCK_CACHE IS enabled by default in 5.1.1.3.
#define MZ_USE_PLACES (the default as of 5.1.1.3) enables block cache
(see top of gc2/vm.c file).
If you have a pre 5.1.1 version or have places disabled, then my block
cache patch won't be of any help.
Kevin
On 04/23/2011 01:09 AM, Nevo wrote
hi Kevin:
Your patch seems requiring "USE_BLOCK_CACHE" to be enabled. Sorry for my
lack of knowledge into Racket's memory management component, how can I
safely enable that because I cannot find its reference in configure or
Makefile.in? Thanks!
Nevo
On 23 April 2011 14:27, Nevo wrote:
> hi R
18 matches
Mail list logo
