Re: [racket-dev] contract-test.rktl

2011-05-11 Thread Robby Findler
Ha! :) Thanks, Robby On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> Someone somewhere along the way seems to have disabled >> contract-test.rktl (ie the main contract library test suite) in drdr. >> >> Anyone know who/why? (Eli is marked as last editi

Re: [racket-dev] contract-test.rktl

2011-05-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote: > Someone somewhere along the way seems to have disabled > contract-test.rktl (ie the main contract library test suite) in drdr. > > Anyone know who/why? (Eli is marked as last editing that line in the > props file, but that doesn't mean he changed it, I don't thi

[racket-dev] contract-test.rktl

2011-05-11 Thread Robby Findler
Someone somewhere along the way seems to have disabled contract-test.rktl (ie the main contract library test suite) in drdr. Anyone know who/why? (Eli is marked as last editing that line in the props file, but that doesn't mean he changed it, I don't think) Thanks, Robby _

Re: [racket-dev] memory consumption (bug?) on Debian/kFreeBSD-i386

2011-05-11 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 10 May 2011 23:58:07 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I don't claim to understand all the implications yet, but the following > patch seems to work, i.e. catching both SIGSEGV and SIGBUS with the same > handler. As a followup, I talked a bit more to the Debian/kFreeBSD developers and my cur