On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Yes, please do separate the stepper tests out into another file.
Got it, done.
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
I think Eli is saying that it would create a bad dependency where
badness isn't something that is easy to say precisely what it is,
but the rough idea is that there is a hierarchy of modules (ie a
grouping of modules into levels of a tree) and dependencies should go
one direction. Making drracket
Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
I think Eli is saying that it would create a bad dependency where
Yes, the redundant was a bad translation of something like a
dependency we don't really need.
badness isn't something that is easy to say precisely what it is,
but the rough idea is that
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
[*] As an example, rackunit might become dependent on drr in
On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Stephen Chang wrote:
I just observed something that gave me a bit of a start; it appears to me
that bindings in the teaching languages are still parsed as top-level
bindings, and not as module bindings. This is weird, because I'm pretty
confident that the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax taints, like syntax certificates before, are intended to
protect macro expansions from
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax taints, like syntax certificates before, are
A few seconds ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few seconds ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* If you write program-processing tools or languages that use
`syntax-recertify', you'll need to change them to use
`syntax-disarm' and possibly `syntax-rearm'.
Does this change (more generally than the part I've
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
Things you need to know:
* When writing a macro (without `syntax-rules', `define-syntax-rule',
or `syntax-id-rules'), apply `syntax-protect' to the macro's
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
Things you need to know:
* When writing a macro (without `syntax-rules',
12 matches
Mail list logo
