On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Stephen Chang wrote: >> I just observed something that gave me a bit of a start; it appears to me >> that bindings in the teaching languages are still parsed as top-level >> bindings, and not as module bindings. This is weird, because I'm pretty >> confident that the definitions get wrapped in a module before expansion. >> However, I'm seeing #f as the value for the 'identifier-binding' on >> variables in my beginner-language stepper test cases, and in fact in the >> real stepper as well.
Nix nix... I believe I was confusing the identifier-binding with the module-path. Mea culpa, ignore my question. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
