As part of the PortAudio library, I want to be able to call this code:
void bufferAdd(short *dst, short *src, int len) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
this racket bug was discovered when I was trying out geiser which
starts programs in a way that exposes this bug. The program starts
correctly but none of the buttons work (or only reserve screen space)
and it is hard to terminate the program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/11 09:33, John Clements wrote:
> [*] See earlier thread where the general consensus was that it was
> not possible to make a Racket version of this run less than (IIRC)
> 5x slower than C.
What is the subject of that thread?
Marijn
-BEGI
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/09/11 09:33, John Clements wrote:
>> [*] See earlier thread where the general consensus was that it was
>> not possible to make a Racket version of this run less than (IIRC)
>> 5x slower than
At Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:43:02 -0400,
Luke Vilnis wrote:
> Running this produces:
>
> eq? 0.0 #f
> eqv? 0.0 #t
> Float? #t
> Float-Or-Integer? #f
With the latest from git on Debian 32 bit, I get `#t' for all four.
What environment are you using?
> The part of TR that generates the compound contrac
Hmm, curiouser and curiouser. Using the latest nightly build from
http://pre.racket-lang.org/installers/, I get #f #t #t #f both on my home
machine and work machine, which run Windows 7 64-bit. Now I'm really curious
as to what's going on here!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Vincent St-Amour wro
Do you know about CPANTS? I just heard about it. The idea, as I
understand it, translated to our terms, is essentially this:
- every PLaneT package comes with a test suite
- when the package is downloaded, the test suite runs
- if the test suite fails, the user is informed right away (to perhaps
I would love to see something like that be a part of planet
(presumably 2.0). I had lots of similar ideas for 1.0, but never was
able to get going significantly on them. FWIW.
Robby
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> Do you know about CPANTS? I just heard about it.
Yes, we hate facebook. But our facebook page has a GENUINELY EMBARRASSING
number of "like"s (uh... 57?). Forwarded from an entirely unrelated list,
could we consider putting those facebook/twitter/linkedin "like" buttons on the
racket-lang.org page? Is this something we've already considered
Is there any correlation between number of likes and well.. anything?
On 09/09/2011 12:43 PM, John Clements wrote:
> Yes, we hate facebook. But our facebook page has a GENUINELY EMBARRASSING
> number of "like"s (uh... 57?). Forwarded from an entirely unrelated list,
> could we consider putting
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Is there any correlation between number of likes and well.. anything?
Everyone else is doing it. I know Matthias will go for that one.
In the "I read it on the internet" category, this page
http://www.social-networking-success.com/facebook-lik
On Sep 9, 2011, at 3:11 PM, John Clements wrote:
> I know Matthias will go for that one.
If you show me where to push the button. I like pushing buttons :-)
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
I'm not familiar with CPANTS, but automating real-world feedback
something like that sounds useful.
I think you should be conscientious about the tiny "phoning back to the
mothership with more info" privacy problem, and how best to manage that,
even if it's just real disclosure (not "privacy p
If you add Facebook buttons to "racket-lang.org", I recommend *not*
doing it in the usual way, which is referencing JS/CSS/images/etc. from
Facebook at page load time. That can actually silently track most
people's reading/viewing/posting/messaging behavior across most popular
Web pages these
On 09/09/2011 01:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> If you add Facebook buttons to "racket-lang.org", I recommend *not* doing it
> in the usual way, which is referencing JS/CSS/images/etc. from Facebook at
> page
> load time. That can actually silently track most people's
> reading/viewing/posting/m
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> I'm not familiar with CPANTS, but automating real-world feedback something
> like that sounds useful.
>
> I think you should be conscientious about the tiny "phoning back to the
> mothership with more info" privacy problem, and how best to ma
John Clements wrote at 09/09/2011 04:00 PM:
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
I'm not familiar with CPANTS, but automating real-world feedback something like
that sounds useful.
I think you should be conscientious about the tiny "phoning back to the mothership with more
inf
Thanks, Jay! Uh... whoever you are?
John
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Facebook"
> Date: September 9, 2011 1:33:15 PM PDT
> To: John Clements
> Subject: Jay Kominek likes PLT Racket.
> Reply-To: Facebook
>
> facebook
> Jay Kominek likes PLT Racket.
> Update PLT Racket
> See All Not
You're welcome?
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, John Clements wrote:
> Thanks, Jay! Uh... whoever you are?
>
> John
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *"Facebook"
> *Date: *September 9, 2011 1:33:15 PM PDT
> *To: *John Clements
> *Subject: **Jay Kominek likes PLT Racket.*
> *Reply-To: *Fac
Yes, thanks!
Robby
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jay Kominek wrote:
> You're welcome?
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, John Clements
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jay! Uh... whoever you are?
>>
>> John
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *"Facebook"
>> *Date: *September 9, 2011 1:33:15 P
Now when do we get our check for $179 (or whatever it was). Can I just send
my address to the internets?
Robby
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Yes, thanks!
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jay Kominek wrote:
>
>> You're welcome?
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at
If you will kindly fax your account information on a company letterhead I
will contact my lawyer to initiate transfer of the requisite funds
forthwithly.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Now when do we get our check for $179 (or whatever it was). Can I just send
> my addres
Why not make it a button? "A problem appears! [Click here] to
send details of this problem to the package developers."
6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> John Clements wrote at 09/09/2011 04:00 PM:
> > On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not familiar with CPANTS, but
23 matches
Mail list logo
