I downloaded the pre-release built Thursday, July 26, 2012, 13:30 EDT,
which had the same filename as the previous version. I get exactly the
same crash on Windows XP 32-bit as before.
Doug
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Doug: Can you test your program again with the re
On Jul 26, 2012, at 2:48 PM, John Clements wrote:
> Right now, the stepper and the ordinary interactions window disagree in one
> minor detail (well, one that I know about…): In the stepper, test cases (e.g.
> (check-expect (+ 3 4) 7)) reduce to a boolean, and leave a printed boolean
> value
I am almost sure there are additional explanations of 3d syntax and its
problems between then and now.
When we (re)discovered 3d syntax at IU in 1984, we thought it was better than
sliced bread. So it is natural that many other people re-discover it and want
to use it in Racket.
On Jul 27
Thanks for the explanation. I think i understand now what i did wrong.
The 3D syntax was a good hint for further reading. I digged up a thread*
where you already had to explain it 10 years ago :)
Tobias
* http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/mailarch/plt-scheme-2002/msg00111.html
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:
Ryan Culpepper writes:
> * Mike Sperber
> - DMdA Tests
> - Stepper Tests
> - Signature Tests
Done.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
5 matches
Mail list logo
