No, only Eli can do that (or the submitter).
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I close pull requests made to the plt/racket repo on GitHub? Am I
authorized to do that in the first place?
Neil ⊥
_
Racket Developers
I'm doing some micro-optimizations on my rb-tree implementation. One thing
I'm testing is inserting the entire contents of /usr/share/dict/words.
It's heavily dominated by structure-mutation code.
Under 5.3.1, I see the following times:
Timing construction of /usr/share/dict/words:
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on
OpenBSD (I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
On amd64 Racket installs this files:
/usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_168.png
/usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_169.png
I don't know if this is the reason, but I do know that Matthew made
the jit able to see thru some structure operations. Perhaps that
enables some other optimizations now that weren't in 5.3.1.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
I'm doing some
What are they?
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on OpenBSD
(I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
On amd64 Racket installs this files:
On 11/19/12 00:08, Robby Findler wrote:
What are they?
The most of the images say we claim the privilege. One is the US Congress.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1
How does compare to builtin mutable hashes?
2012/11/18, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org:
I'm doing some micro-optimizations on my rb-tree implementation. One thing
I'm testing is inserting the entire contents of /usr/share/dict/words.
It's heavily dominated by structure-mutation code.
I have it as well. Seems to be in the git repo. Google of the phrase is
interesting as well.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 11/19/12 00:08, Robby Findler wrote:
What are they?
The most of the images say we claim the
file:///usr/local/racket/doc/images/Spatial_Transformations.html?q=Compositing
It is being generated and used as part of the standard doc.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ray Racine ray.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
I have it as well. Seems to be in the git repo. Google of the phrase is
Yes, a program that is all structure creation, access, and mutation
should run around twice as fast compared to v5.3.1.
At Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:07:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
I don't know if this is the reason, but I do know that Matthew made
the jit able to see thru some structure
On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the Compositing docs.
Do you see errors in one installation and images in the other?
Yes. I see errors (red text in the web page) in both
Sounds like a bug to me, then.
Thanks!
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the
It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in
Typed Racket. The problem type is this:
(: flomap-transform
(case-
(flomap Flomap-Transform - flomap)
(flomap Flomap-Transform Integer Integer Integer Integer
- flomap)))
The contract system claims that
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in Typed
Racket. The problem type is this:
(: flomap-transform
(case-
(flomap Flomap-Transform - flomap)
(flomap Flomap-Transform Integer
I'm writing the documentation for math/array, and the examples all fail.
Here's a simple one:
@examples[#:eval untyped-eval
(array [0 1 2 3])]
The evaluator raises this error:
application: not a procedure;
expected a procedure that can be applied to arguments
(Perhaps this suggests a problem with making a macro depend on the shape of
parens around a sub-expression.)
On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
I'm writing the documentation for math/array, and the examples all fail.
Here's a simple one:
@examples[#:eval untyped-eval
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi olopie...@gmail.comwrote:
How does compare to builtin mutable hashes?
The following code represents a rough hashtable equivalent of what my rb
code would be enabling (quick search for word by position):
;; We might be curious as to
17 matches
Mail list logo
