On 20/02/14 14:19, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sun, 09 Feb 2014 08:35:03 +, "Paulo J. Matos" wrote:
On 09/02/14 00:03, Matthew Flatt wrote:
There should be many more flags passed to `gcc`, including some -I
flags and some -D flags.
Is something in your environment overriding the CFLAGS definit
That sounds much more sensible than including "COPYING.txt" and
"COPYING_LESSER.txt" everywhere. Unless someone tells me that it's a
bad idea, I'll switch packages to refer to LGPL by reference.
At Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:45:50 -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> For at least third-party packages (though yo
For at least third-party packages (though you might want something
trickier for core Racket)...
I'm not a lawyer, but I figured that, for most packages I author, I
probably don't *need* to include the full text of a well-known license
(e.g., LGPLv3). Instead, I give the copyright notice, stat
On Feb 21, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Since Asumu didn't mention it, the first paper about this is here:
> http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/oopsla12-tsdthf.pdf
Yeah, but don't read this. We will share a draft paper that looks more
practical if you want to try it out.
_
At Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:17:26 +0100, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> As I am testing upcoming 6.0 release build process, one thing that strikes me
> is the number of LICENCE.txt files, 166 of them. add the 3 for the copying
> COPYING-libscheme.txt, COPYING_LESSER.txt, COPYING.txt makes 169 in total.
>
>
On Feb 20, 2014 10:33 PM, "Neil Toronto" wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2014 02:52 PM, as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>>
>> asumu has updated `master' from 1f27fb7848 to 1c6c0855f7.
>>http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/1f27fb7848..1c6c0855f7
>>
>> =[ 103 Commits ]===
Hi,
As I am testing upcoming 6.0 release build process, one thing that strikes me
is the number of LICENCE.txt files, 166 of them. add the 3 for the copying
COPYING-libscheme.txt, COPYING_LESSER.txt, COPYING.txt makes 169 in total.
Is is really necessary to have the 166 copies of the same file
7 matches
Mail list logo
