On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>> > Why does he think "Performance sucks"?
>>
>> Because here's the list of things that are slow
>
> DrRacket is an operating system running on top of your other OS
> to make life for Racket developers simple. It was originally develope
I don't think those are the things being complained about. I read a
complaint about non-incremental GC, a complaint about DrRacket IO
(which is really quite slow because it uses an editor which is
overkill for a stream of text), possibly a complaint about the FFI
(but maybe there's more there?). An
Right, I don't think that any of Artyom's comments are about the issue
that Matthias was bringing up, but I do think that's it a real issue.
Sam
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I don't think those are the things being complained about. I read a
> complaint about non-increm
Sam:
> Could we
> - warn people when they use `time` in DrRacket?
> - provide a "performance" mode that runs programs out-of-process, or
> just in another place?
> - something else?
I like this. DrRacket has a performance mode already (disable
profiling and debugging) in the (hidded part) of t
On May 6, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> How about an extra button, a "Run Benchmark" button?
+ω
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> How about an extra button, a "Run Benchmark" button?
You can already get this with the "benchmark" package, from pkg.racket-lang.
>
> /Jens Axel
>
>
> 2014-05-06 19:43 GMT+02:00 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt :
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen
>> wrote:
>>>
> Why does he thin
2014-05-06 23:48 GMT+02:00 Stephen Chang :
>> How about an extra button, a "Run Benchmark" button?
>
> You can already get this with the "benchmark" package, from pkg.racket-lang.
A builtin button will hopefully make it obvious even for non-DrRacket
users, that Run is not intended for benchmarks.
7 matches
Mail list logo
