Correct.
On Nov 7, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I don't think so.
>
> Neither of you appear to have commit c02797b12160651762a769414de06dcca8ba635e.
>
> That version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click
> on one of the examples.
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:08
I don't think so.
Neither of you appear to have commit c02797b12160651762a769414de06dcca8ba635e.
That version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click
on one of the examples.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> In the most recent version (I think), you
In the most recent version (I think), you can simulate Stephen's complaint like
this:
-- switch to BSL, make sure buffer is empty
-- cmd L
-- click on a #lang line
-- when the dialog comes up, say yes to adding the #lang line
Now you're in an inconsistent state. Just run the buffer.
O
I think you missed a revision to the dialog. The currently pushed
version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click on
one of the examples.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
> Clicking on #lang racket brings up a friendly dialog box saying "you're
> reall
Clicking on #lang racket brings up a friendly dialog box saying "you're really
supposed to edit the buffer directly... That said, would you like me to add
#lang racket to the definitions window?" Sounds good so far... but if I say
"yes" to accept this reasonable offer, it leaves me in an illeg
5 matches
Mail list logo
