At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
mflatt:
- new case implementation (by Jon Zeppieri) (7ccf0efce9)
- for/vector improvements (8a26d83651)
- add #:break, #:final to for forms (fc52248446)
- add racket/format (b53e458e3f)
- add define-logger etc (d92b9cb404)
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
samth:
- type-contract fixes/changes (9e1cf579a4, 962f2472e1)
- add #:opaque and #:struct to require/typed (9054d0db7d)
Typed Racket now handles higher-order values provided to untyped
modules under the type `Any`
Was it wrong before? Suboptimal somehow?
On Oct 28, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
samth:
- type-contract fixes/changes (9e1cf579a4, 962f2472e1)
- add #:opaque and #:struct to
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Was it wrong before? Suboptimal somehow?
It was suboptimal in that more operations should be allowed now (such
as accessing elements of a mutable vector provided under the type
`Any`). However, some of the errors
Can you make succinct examples of operations that would have
gone wrong with the past interpretation of Any and can you
explain how the new interpretation will do better? Please
share here.
Thanks -- Matthias
On Oct 28, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Can you make succinct examples of operations that would have
gone wrong with the past interpretation of Any and can you
explain how the new interpretation will do better? Please
share here.
Here's a quick
At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
stamourv:
- scheme language deprecation notice (68260a6c86)
- compat: packages, mutable lists (800a328fe6)
- NaN included in all float types (a6d5a98b61)
* The `#lang scheme' language is deprecated. `#lang racket' should be
Is the first one is something new? Otherwise, I'm not sure that any of
these should be in the release announcement, unless maybe there's something
I'm missing about the changes?
Robby
On Sunday, October 28, 2012, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper
For the first one, the new part is the deprecation notice in the
docs. Probably not worth including.
The others items are not major changes. I don't mind if they're not
included.
Vincent
At Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:38:44 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Is the first one is something new? Otherwise,
At least in principle, if such code exists, its authors think that it can't
work and therefore won't run it (and get a result all of a sudden).
Is it possible that code blows up under the new operation that wouldn't have
blown up under the old one?
-- Matthias
On Oct 28, 2012, at 1:20 PM,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At least in principle, if such code exists, its authors think that it can't
work and therefore won't run it (and get a result all of a sudden).
Is it possible that code blows up under the new operation that
On second thought, I think we should include all of the bullets
Vincent lists (below) and remove this one Matthew lists:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* The `for' form now supports `#:break' and `#:final' clauses.
Robby
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:04
* DrRacket now runs Check Syntax continuously in the background
(by default; this was available in previous releases, but
disabled by default)
Robby
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
I believe this is the first release where online check syntax is enabled by
default. I'm not sure, but I also think that it hasn't been mentioned in
the release notes before.
Robby
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is
14 matches
Mail list logo